Nerita Vitiensis
nvitiensis.bsky.social
Nerita Vitiensis
@nvitiensis.bsky.social
Signal processing researcher and research integrity sleuth.

Commenting on PubPeer as "Nerita Vitiensis".
Reposted by Nerita Vitiensis
Reverse Image Forensics Challenge: Try to find a unique area in Figure 9 of this recent Scientific Reports paper: 10.1038/s41598-025-17456-6 [Aug 2025] - Annotated by ImageTwin.ai
November 11, 2025 at 1:49 AM
Reposted by Nerita Vitiensis
I invite @acm.org to review their articles with Tortured Phrases dbrech.irit.fr/pls/apex/f?p... (not the first time I'm doing so, here and on LinkedIn www.linkedin.com/posts/guilla...)
October 2, 2025 at 9:33 AM
Reposted by Nerita Vitiensis
Today, our article "The entities enabling scientific fraud at scale are large, resilient, and growing rapidly" is finally published in PNAS. I hope that it proves to be a wake-up-call for the whole scientific community.

reeserichardson.blog/2025/08/04/a...
A do-or-die moment for the scientific enterprise
Reflecting on our paper “The entities enabling scientific fraud at scale are large, resilient, and growing rapidly”
reeserichardson.blog
August 4, 2025 at 8:47 PM
Reposted by Nerita Vitiensis
Anyone can do post-publication peer review.
Anyone can be a steward of the scientific literature.
Anyone can do forensic metascience.
Anyone can sleuth.

That's why we are launching COSIG: the Collection of Open Science Integrity Guides, an open source resource for all of the above.

cosig.net
June 4, 2025 at 1:32 PM
This was a tricky one. Not surprised the reviewers hadn't noticed. #ImageForensics
May 7, 2025 at 1:57 PM
It's actually kinda creative, in a terrible, fraud kind of way...
April 28, 2025 at 7:15 AM
Honestly, I've been worried about this for a while. There's so much pollution in the literature, it's only a matter of time before people start picking up nonsense like "profound learning" and "irregular woodland" because they *think* it's an accepted term. It's probably happening already...
Thanks for clarifying. So these authors could be the first and unscrupulous users of the software or the PhD students who read an article with these tortured phrases and decided to use the same terms, because 'published authors know best" ...
April 23, 2025 at 8:02 AM
Tortured phrase of the day:

"221B Pastry specialist Road in London"
April 1, 2025 at 11:12 AM
I knew the ICCCNT 2024 conference proceedings were full of papermill nonsense, but seeing the actual number in the PPS still shocked me.

346 (!!) papers with tortured phrases!

Does #IEEE really have zero quality checks?

Brief proceedings-level report here: pubpeer.com/publications...
March 11, 2025 at 2:53 PM
February 24, 2025 at 2:09 PM
Hey #IEEE, can you explain where your "Diversity, Equity & Inclusion at IEEE" page went?!

Last week, it was still linked on the front page.

Now: It's gone, and the old link goes to "We are sorry, the page you are looking for has been moved or removed."

www.ieee.org/about/divers...
February 24, 2025 at 11:27 AM
I think this is one of the worst cases of machine-"paraphrased" nonsense I've seen yet. This goes beyond #TorturedPhrases and straight into incomprehensible gibberish.
(Springer conference paper; not posted to PubPeer yet since the site's having some issues)
February 21, 2025 at 9:11 AM
Sadly, this one doesn't even stand out from the rest. IEEE publishes some of the top conferences of several fields (CVPR, anyone?), but they are drowned out by a sea of papermill nonsense. Infuriating.

In related news, IEEE still hasn't done anything about this:
pubpeer.com/publications...
February 13, 2025 at 8:47 AM
I see the reviewers have been reading this article very carefully...
pubpeer.com/publications...
November 25, 2024 at 2:38 PM
For now, let's start with some of my favorite tortured phrases. These were found in "scientific" articles on machine learning, signal processing, and medicine. Can anyone decipher them without context?
November 18, 2024 at 2:38 PM
Oh! Hi everyone! 😲
I guess I should start actually posting here, huh?😊
November 18, 2024 at 2:36 PM