Mike Yeomans
@mikeyeomans.bsky.social
Decision-making in conversation, Natural Language Processing
Assistant Professor @imperialcollege @ImperialBiz
Assistant Professor @imperialcollege @ImperialBiz
Great write-up of our recent management science paper on workplace development. Bottom line - focus on the future, not the past, to give and receive more helpful advice!
www.linkedin.com/posts/mgt-sc...
www.linkedin.com/posts/mgt-sc...
#workplaceculture #professionaldevelopment #leadership #organizationalbehavior #managementscience | Management Science
💬 𝐖𝐡𝐲 𝐀𝐬𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐟𝐨𝐫 "𝐀𝐝𝐯𝐢𝐜𝐞" 𝐈𝐬 𝐁𝐞𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐓𝐡𝐚𝐧 𝐀𝐬𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐟𝐨𝐫 "𝐅𝐞𝐞𝐝𝐛𝐚𝐜𝐤"
Countless hours are spent on workplace "feedback," from performance reviews to check-ins. But much of it is vague and unhelpful.
What...
www.linkedin.com
October 8, 2025 at 6:55 AM
Great write-up of our recent management science paper on workplace development. Bottom line - focus on the future, not the past, to give and receive more helpful advice!
www.linkedin.com/posts/mgt-sc...
www.linkedin.com/posts/mgt-sc...
Reposted by Mike Yeomans
If you're at @aomconnect.bsky.social #AOM2025, come check out our panel on NLP in organizations, featuring @dholtz.bsky.social, Sameer Srivastava, @williambrady.bsky.social, @mikeyeomans.bsky.social & me! We'll explore topics including hiring, cooperation, agency, and moral outrage -- don't miss it!
July 26, 2025 at 4:23 PM
If you're at @aomconnect.bsky.social #AOM2025, come check out our panel on NLP in organizations, featuring @dholtz.bsky.social, Sameer Srivastava, @williambrady.bsky.social, @mikeyeomans.bsky.social & me! We'll explore topics including hiring, cooperation, agency, and moral outrage -- don't miss it!
Reposted by Mike Yeomans
October 14, 2024 at 11:37 PM
Reposted by Mike Yeomans
Here’s my vision statement from my application for Editor in Chief of Psychological Science. I wrote it before getting the position, my plans & goals are evolving now that I’m getting started. Look out for an opening editorial!
https://sometimesimwrong.typepad.com/wrong/2023/10/my-next-chapter.html
https://sometimesimwrong.typepad.com/wrong/2023/10/my-next-chapter.html
my next chapter
i've been selected as the incoming editor in chief of Psychological Science. i am thrilled, humbled, and excited for this next chapter, and very grateful for all the people who invited, accompanied, a...
sometimesimwrong.typepad.com
October 9, 2023 at 4:48 PM
Here’s my vision statement from my application for Editor in Chief of Psychological Science. I wrote it before getting the position, my plans & goals are evolving now that I’m getting started. Look out for an opening editorial!
https://sometimesimwrong.typepad.com/wrong/2023/10/my-next-chapter.html
https://sometimesimwrong.typepad.com/wrong/2023/10/my-next-chapter.html
Reposted by Mike Yeomans
On further reflection, the selection of @simine.com as Editor-in-Chief of Psychological Science is one of the most important milestones for the reform movement in psychology.
There will be impact on the journal, sure. But more, selecting a committed, visible reformer illustrates its normalization.
There will be impact on the journal, sure. But more, selecting a committed, visible reformer illustrates its normalization.
October 6, 2023 at 12:55 PM
On further reflection, the selection of @simine.com as Editor-in-Chief of Psychological Science is one of the most important milestones for the reform movement in psychology.
There will be impact on the journal, sure. But more, selecting a committed, visible reformer illustrates its normalization.
There will be impact on the journal, sure. But more, selecting a committed, visible reformer illustrates its normalization.
Reposted by Mike Yeomans
THE NEW EIC OF PSYCH SCIENCE IS @simine.com WAAAAHHHHHHHHH!!!!
www.psychologicalscience.org/publications...
www.psychologicalscience.org/publications...
<em>Psychological Science</em> Names Incoming Editor-in-Chief
APS is pleased to announce that Simine Vazire has been selected as the next Editor-in-Chief of Psychological Science. Vazire is a Professor of Psychology at the University of Melbourne, where she serv...
www.psychologicalscience.org
October 4, 2023 at 5:00 PM
THE NEW EIC OF PSYCH SCIENCE IS @simine.com WAAAAHHHHHHHHH!!!!
www.psychologicalscience.org/publications...
www.psychologicalscience.org/publications...
Reposted by Mike Yeomans
Open data sharing is a good thing; Protecting participant privacy is a good thing. Sometimes these two good things are in conflict.
Our new preprint introduces a decision-making framework and open source tools to help share as openly as possible and as closed as necessary.
osf.io/preprints/me...
Our new preprint introduces a decision-making framework and open source tools to help share as openly as possible and as closed as necessary.
osf.io/preprints/me...
October 4, 2023 at 2:46 PM
Open data sharing is a good thing; Protecting participant privacy is a good thing. Sometimes these two good things are in conflict.
Our new preprint introduces a decision-making framework and open source tools to help share as openly as possible and as closed as necessary.
osf.io/preprints/me...
Our new preprint introduces a decision-making framework and open source tools to help share as openly as possible and as closed as necessary.
osf.io/preprints/me...
Reposted by Mike Yeomans
Fraud cases may capture attention, but they remain the exception.
The quieter attitudes and actions of the many are incrementally moving science toward greater integrity and rigor.
The visibility of fraud and other antagonism-to-open may contribute to underestimating the support for open science.
The quieter attitudes and actions of the many are incrementally moving science toward greater integrity and rigor.
The visibility of fraud and other antagonism-to-open may contribute to underestimating the support for open science.
October 2, 2023 at 10:48 AM
Fraud cases may capture attention, but they remain the exception.
The quieter attitudes and actions of the many are incrementally moving science toward greater integrity and rigor.
The visibility of fraud and other antagonism-to-open may contribute to underestimating the support for open science.
The quieter attitudes and actions of the many are incrementally moving science toward greater integrity and rigor.
The visibility of fraud and other antagonism-to-open may contribute to underestimating the support for open science.
IMO, reproducibility is an objective and uncontroversial benefit for everyone... and yes,
Journals should require and confirm it. But authors must also invest more time making reproduction EASY for others (ie not just possible). We can't push all this work onto overworked journals.
Journals should require and confirm it. But authors must also invest more time making reproduction EASY for others (ie not just possible). We can't push all this work onto overworked journals.
A plea from Steve Lindsay to psychology professional societies that publish journals: Assess computational reproducibility open.lnu.se/index.php/me...
October 1, 2023 at 1:48 PM
IMO, reproducibility is an objective and uncontroversial benefit for everyone... and yes,
Journals should require and confirm it. But authors must also invest more time making reproduction EASY for others (ie not just possible). We can't push all this work onto overworked journals.
Journals should require and confirm it. But authors must also invest more time making reproduction EASY for others (ie not just possible). We can't push all this work onto overworked journals.
Reposted by Mike Yeomans
A plea from Steve Lindsay to psychology professional societies that publish journals: Assess computational reproducibility open.lnu.se/index.php/me...
October 1, 2023 at 7:00 AM
A plea from Steve Lindsay to psychology professional societies that publish journals: Assess computational reproducibility open.lnu.se/index.php/me...
Hi folks, feels like we're making the move.... #HelloFromTheOtherSide #psychtwitter #econtwitter #NLPtwitter
September 24, 2023 at 8:42 PM
Hi folks, feels like we're making the move.... #HelloFromTheOtherSide #psychtwitter #econtwitter #NLPtwitter