www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026...
www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026...
Also, pretty obvs that 'staffer' was the orange shitgibbon himself.
Also, pretty obvs that 'staffer' was the orange shitgibbon himself.
How does redacting this email sender comply with the Epstein Files Transparency Act?
Is the sender supposed to be a 'victim' here... because "the littlest girl was a little naughty" to him?
This isn't transparency. This isn't legal compliance. This isn't going away.
How does redacting this email sender comply with the Epstein Files Transparency Act?
Is the sender supposed to be a 'victim' here... because "the littlest girl was a little naughty" to him?
This isn't transparency. This isn't legal compliance. This isn't going away.
Variety:
"A Cheeseball Infomercial of Staggering Inertia"
2) Trump v United States, 603 U.S. 593 (2024)
2) Trump v United States, 603 U.S. 593 (2024)