Looks like David Wallace-Wells may have cribbed from this, but I for one am glad he did.
Looks like David Wallace-Wells may have cribbed from this, but I for one am glad he did.
www.reuters.com/legal/litiga...
www.reuters.com/legal/litiga...
Speaking of impactful semantic distinctions: When does an observer become a witness, and what follows?
Speaking of impactful semantic distinctions: When does an observer become a witness, and what follows?
Like equating political protest with “rebellion.” Conspiring equivocations that normalize the exception.
Like equating political protest with “rebellion.” Conspiring equivocations that normalize the exception.
much to appreciate.
much to appreciate.