1/5
1/5
training -> performance -> Olympian
And we have
Training <- other stuff -> Olympian
So if we condition on Olympian, we open a back door between Olympian and training
training -> performance -> Olympian
And we have
Training <- other stuff -> Olympian
So if we condition on Olympian, we open a back door between Olympian and training
1/5
1/5
Final version: sportrxiv.org/index.php/se...
Recommendation: healthmovsci.peercommunityin.org/articles/rec...
Final version: sportrxiv.org/index.php/se...
Recommendation: healthmovsci.peercommunityin.org/articles/rec...
So deserving... I genuinely feel fortunate to have been able to experience it.
So deserving... I genuinely feel fortunate to have been able to experience it.
The great Julius Csotonyi spent 5 months painting over 60 illustrations for the site, no ai used
> neal.fun/size-of-life/
The great Julius Csotonyi spent 5 months painting over 60 illustrations for the site, no ai used
> neal.fun/size-of-life/
I will record lectures & all will be found at this link: github.com/rmcelreath/s...
I will record lectures & all will be found at this link: github.com/rmcelreath/s...
🧵1/7
🧵1/7
1. Constructive peer review
2. Adversarial peer review
I'm looking at this mostly from a psychology/methodology perspective (but wonder what other fields experience)
🧵 1/
1. Constructive peer review
2. Adversarial peer review
I'm looking at this mostly from a psychology/methodology perspective (but wonder what other fields experience)
🧵 1/
Probably the most constructive and useful set of reviews I have ever had... and having them before starting the study makes them even better!
11/10 would recommend!
Probably the most constructive and useful set of reviews I have ever had... and having them before starting the study makes them even better!
11/10 would recommend!
For some reason I vaguely recall it being @scientificdiscovery.dev but I can't find it on your feed.
Does anyone remember this?
For some reason I vaguely recall it being @scientificdiscovery.dev but I can't find it on your feed.
Does anyone remember this?
uni-wh.softgarden.io/job/61280592...
uni-wh.softgarden.io/job/61280592...
In short
- 2239 effect sizes
- extreme between-study heterogeneity
- extensive publication bias
- some subgroup/exercise-specific effects
More below (doi.org/10.31234/osf...)
In short
- 2239 effect sizes
- extreme between-study heterogeneity
- extensive publication bias
- some subgroup/exercise-specific effects
More below (doi.org/10.31234/osf...)
In this brief comment (all four pages are here ⬇️), @iaiversen.bsky.social and I cover the benefits and challenges of living systematic reviews, along with two ways to increase their uptake
🧵 1/8
In this brief comment (all four pages are here ⬇️), @iaiversen.bsky.social and I cover the benefits and challenges of living systematic reviews, along with two ways to increase their uptake
🧵 1/8
😏
😏