hl23.bsky.social
hl23.bsky.social
@hl23.bsky.social
Braindead hack.
October 30, 2025 at 10:09 PM
Love it, every song is a banger.
October 3, 2025 at 12:05 PM
Can you explain to a non-law person how he might think this *isn’t* encouraging them to do this again? I don’t see it.
May 21, 2025 at 7:49 PM
Nah, democracy is crumbling before our eyes and the press is focused on the former President from the party with no power at all. Such a waste of god damn time.
May 18, 2025 at 11:49 PM
Yeah, no. We’ll pass.
April 16, 2025 at 10:15 AM
Can you make your settings so we can share by any chance?
April 15, 2025 at 10:14 AM
Yeah, no thank you.
April 10, 2025 at 8:03 PM
Reposted by hl23.bsky.social
I’m not doomscrolling I’m just crashing my emotional stock market
April 7, 2025 at 10:42 AM
You keep voting for all of them, Jeanne.
April 2, 2025 at 3:01 AM
Not another Dem vote for any Trump nominee, Amy. Hope you guys have found your backbone.
April 2, 2025 at 1:58 AM
How are you reporting on this so casually? "Taking over"?? Is that how you're going to frame it when they try to annex my country too? You gotta do better than this.
April 2, 2025 at 1:34 AM
@cnn.com hasn't mentioned him all morning.
April 1, 2025 at 2:28 PM
Amy, remember when you voted to confirm Ratcliffe, Rubio, Burgrum, Collins, Duffy etc?
April 1, 2025 at 12:50 PM
Holy fuck you’re stupid
February 23, 2025 at 10:42 PM
You literally just said they were platforming someone rooting for us to be 51st state.

Yes and I am free to criticize them for their choices in using my tax dollars on Bluesky.
February 23, 2025 at 10:41 PM
People are allowed any viewpoint they want, it just doesn’t have to be sanewashed by our national broadcaster.
February 23, 2025 at 10:38 PM
The question is framed in a way that suggests a viewpoint that Canada loses its sovereignty is valid/has merit. On Canada’s national broadcaster. It is a dangerous viewpoint to normalize.
February 23, 2025 at 10:37 PM
wtf x 2. Freedom of expression means that Bob who wants to be annexed can say that without consequences, it doesn’t mean CBC has to platform someone cheering for the end of Canada’s sovereignty.
February 23, 2025 at 10:34 PM
wtf? That means we should have a conversation about fixing Canada’s healthcare system, not a conversation about letting our neighbour annex us by economic force!?
February 23, 2025 at 10:32 PM
Doesn’t answer my question really. Canada’s sovereignty is not a conversation for Americans at all. It is dangerous to normalize the opposing viewpoint (anything less than Canada’s complete autonomy) in this scenario.
February 23, 2025 at 10:28 PM
Yes it’s directed at you. What is the “opposing view” in this instance? Why would Canadians and Americans have a joint discussion on Canada’s sovereignty?
February 23, 2025 at 10:20 PM
I really disagree here. The question of Canada’s sovereignty is not really a discussion to be had between Canadians and Americans any more than Ukrainians and Russians should have a joint radio call in show about Ukraine’s sovereignty.
February 23, 2025 at 10:19 PM
Can you explain what you mean by difference of opinion in this situation? Do you mean that people who think we should be annexed should have that opinion platformed by CBC?
February 23, 2025 at 10:05 PM
Seems you’re not listening at all actually!
February 23, 2025 at 2:08 PM
Mexico this year instead. I’ll probably stay out of the US for a long time now.
February 5, 2025 at 11:09 AM