TheRealSparky💙🐸🇺🇸
@funkynassau.bsky.social
💙Proud Democrat 💙 #Resistance 💙#GoBills #BillsMafia #Sabres #California 💙 #Ukraine #Canada 🇨🇦 #Senior 💙 Springsteen lover #ImmigrantsWelcomeHere
DM=🚫 🦬🌊🌊🌊🏈🏒✌🏼🕊️
🚫NO PORN, NO CRYPTO 🚫
DM=🚫 🦬🌊🌊🌊🏈🏒✌🏼🕊️
🚫NO PORN, NO CRYPTO 🚫
Pinned
Reposted by TheRealSparky💙🐸🇺🇸
For me, it was the day he made fun of a disabled person.
November 12, 2025 at 9:10 PM
For me, it was the day he made fun of a disabled person.
Reposted by TheRealSparky💙🐸🇺🇸
Trump's constant pattern is to try to neutralize attacks against him by accusing his adversaries of the exact thing he is guilty of, in hopes of turning it into a "both sides say."
Will always be puzzled as to why Republicans hammered so hard on the Epstein stuff given that it was obvious that it would be a huge risk for their own guy
Trump and Epstein were buddies throughout the height of his trafficking -- what did they think would happen?
www.nytimes.com/2025/11/12/u...
Trump and Epstein were buddies throughout the height of his trafficking -- what did they think would happen?
www.nytimes.com/2025/11/12/u...
Epstein Alleged in Emails That Trump Knew of His Conduct
www.nytimes.com
November 12, 2025 at 5:54 PM
Trump's constant pattern is to try to neutralize attacks against him by accusing his adversaries of the exact thing he is guilty of, in hopes of turning it into a "both sides say."
Reposted by TheRealSparky💙🐸🇺🇸
Had the same reaction. Did I miss something where everyone rich and famous sends emails that are incomprehensible gibberish?
Seen a few of the epstein emails now, all with different people and it's not the main issue here but is everyone illiterate
November 12, 2025 at 6:43 PM
Had the same reaction. Did I miss something where everyone rich and famous sends emails that are incomprehensible gibberish?
Reposted by TheRealSparky💙🐸🇺🇸
Follow up question: How do you explain to your son that you are paid to make excuses for pedophiles?
JIANG: Did the president ever spend hours at Epstein's house with a victim?
LEAVITT: These emails prove absolutely nothing, other than the fact that President Trump did nothing wrong
LEAVITT: These emails prove absolutely nothing, other than the fact that President Trump did nothing wrong
November 12, 2025 at 6:48 PM
Follow up question: How do you explain to your son that you are paid to make excuses for pedophiles?
Reposted by TheRealSparky💙🐸🇺🇸
So, what is the MAGA *base* telling themselves about why Trump is so desperate to keep this information hidden? Is there even a story, or is it just pure cognitive dissonance and change the subject? www.nytimes.com/2025/11/12/u...
Trump Ramps Up Pressure on G.O.P. to Thwart Epstein Vote
www.nytimes.com
November 12, 2025 at 8:01 PM
So, what is the MAGA *base* telling themselves about why Trump is so desperate to keep this information hidden? Is there even a story, or is it just pure cognitive dissonance and change the subject? www.nytimes.com/2025/11/12/u...
Reposted by TheRealSparky💙🐸🇺🇸
Against my own instincts I am turning into a pretty unashamed credentialist. We've become so enamored of the Hollywood narrative where the scrappy outsider proves all the established experts wrong that we lose sight of how rare it is in reality, and how HUGELY damaging it is to treat as probable.
I'm kinda not a fan of credentialism
"Non-scientists" can have insight
And actual scientists can be grifters
So the substance is what matters
But how can you judge substance unless you're an expert lol
But also people just cherry pick their fave experts all the time too
No good solution really
"Non-scientists" can have insight
And actual scientists can be grifters
So the substance is what matters
But how can you judge substance unless you're an expert lol
But also people just cherry pick their fave experts all the time too
No good solution really
If you are also a scientist, sure. If you aren't, like these guys, you should probably shut the fuck up and let the people whose opinions matter talk.
November 12, 2025 at 8:09 PM
Against my own instincts I am turning into a pretty unashamed credentialist. We've become so enamored of the Hollywood narrative where the scrappy outsider proves all the established experts wrong that we lose sight of how rare it is in reality, and how HUGELY damaging it is to treat as probable.
Reposted by TheRealSparky💙🐸🇺🇸
Also, very funny how the Dems keep trying to do this “release the Epstein files!” thing as a naked base pander in mimicry of the other side’s conspiratorial muckraking, and then the files actually do get released, and it’s like “oh wait Trump really is all over these things, he really did it huh”
November 12, 2025 at 8:35 PM
Also, very funny how the Dems keep trying to do this “release the Epstein files!” thing as a naked base pander in mimicry of the other side’s conspiratorial muckraking, and then the files actually do get released, and it’s like “oh wait Trump really is all over these things, he really did it huh”
Reposted by TheRealSparky💙🐸🇺🇸
If you are also a scientist, sure. If you aren't, like these guys, you should probably shut the fuck up and let the people whose opinions matter talk.
JD Vance: "Science as practiced in its best form is that if you disagree with it, then you ought to criticize it and you ought to argue against it."
November 12, 2025 at 5:46 PM
If you are also a scientist, sure. If you aren't, like these guys, you should probably shut the fuck up and let the people whose opinions matter talk.
Reposted by TheRealSparky💙🐸🇺🇸
JD Vance: "I'm a little fatter than I should be"
November 12, 2025 at 5:50 PM
JD Vance: "I'm a little fatter than I should be"
Reposted by TheRealSparky💙🐸🇺🇸
JD Vance: "I don't know if you saw this media circulating on social media, but the president met the president of Syria, al-Sharaa, in the Oval Office a couple of days ago, and he asked him, 'How many wives do you have?' Heh heh heh heh heh! Haaaaaa! Amazing comedic timing."
November 12, 2025 at 5:52 PM
JD Vance: "I don't know if you saw this media circulating on social media, but the president met the president of Syria, al-Sharaa, in the Oval Office a couple of days ago, and he asked him, 'How many wives do you have?' Heh heh heh heh heh! Haaaaaa! Amazing comedic timing."
Reposted by TheRealSparky💙🐸🇺🇸
I lost brain cells listening to this
JD Vance: "Science as practiced in its best form is that if you disagree with it, then you ought to criticize it and you ought to argue against it."
November 12, 2025 at 5:51 PM
I lost brain cells listening to this
Reposted by TheRealSparky💙🐸🇺🇸
This sounds reasonable but is 100% wrong. Whether you or agree or disagree with a study is completely immaterial. What matters is whether the study was conducted properly and generates valid results. And it's impolitic to say but it's true: you have to have some level of expertise to judge that.
JD Vance: "Science as practiced in its best form is that if you disagree with it, then you ought to criticize it and you ought to argue against it."
November 12, 2025 at 5:57 PM
This sounds reasonable but is 100% wrong. Whether you or agree or disagree with a study is completely immaterial. What matters is whether the study was conducted properly and generates valid results. And it's impolitic to say but it's true: you have to have some level of expertise to judge that.
Reposted by TheRealSparky💙🐸🇺🇸
JD Vance: "Science as practiced in its best form is that if you disagree with it, then you ought to criticize it and you ought to argue against it."
November 12, 2025 at 5:36 PM
JD Vance: "Science as practiced in its best form is that if you disagree with it, then you ought to criticize it and you ought to argue against it."
Reposted by TheRealSparky💙🐸🇺🇸
November 12, 2025 at 5:40 PM
Reposted by TheRealSparky💙🐸🇺🇸
HUD Secretary Scott Turner: "There's a lot of research and study that has to be done, not just one the 50 year mortgage, but on all the ideas that are coming forward through the leadership of this administration."
November 12, 2025 at 6:03 PM
HUD Secretary Scott Turner: "There's a lot of research and study that has to be done, not just one the 50 year mortgage, but on all the ideas that are coming forward through the leadership of this administration."
Reposted by TheRealSparky💙🐸🇺🇸
this should be obvious but the reason Trump is working desperately against Epstein transparency is because he's guilty
November 12, 2025 at 6:06 PM
this should be obvious but the reason Trump is working desperately against Epstein transparency is because he's guilty
Reposted by TheRealSparky💙🐸🇺🇸
"Your expertise is no better than my ignorance."
JD Vance: "Science as practiced in its best form is that if you disagree with it, then you ought to criticize it and you ought to argue against it."
November 12, 2025 at 6:08 PM
"Your expertise is no better than my ignorance."
Reposted by TheRealSparky💙🐸🇺🇸
Isn’t Kash Patel Norwegian though? He has a beard and he’s gonna see Charlie Kirk in Valhalla
Hegseth: "We don't need to be a military of beardos anymore. Do you know how many troops claim to be Nordic Pagan? No, suddenly it's become this real fake religious affiliation inside the Pentagon where troops came to be Nordic Pagan so they can grow a beard and nobody challenges them on it."
November 12, 2025 at 6:11 PM
Isn’t Kash Patel Norwegian though? He has a beard and he’s gonna see Charlie Kirk in Valhalla
Reposted by TheRealSparky💙🐸🇺🇸
the man makes meatball rob look like james brown
JD Vance: "I don't know if you saw this media circulating on social media, but the president met the president of Syria, al-Sharaa, in the Oval Office a couple of days ago, and he asked him, 'How many wives do you have?' Heh heh heh heh heh! Haaaaaa! Amazing comedic timing."
November 12, 2025 at 6:32 PM
the man makes meatball rob look like james brown
Reposted by TheRealSparky💙🐸🇺🇸
Q: Is the president prepared to bankrupt the BBC?
LEAVITT: This is a leftist propaganda machine that unfortunately is subsidized by British taxpayers, and he thinks that's extremely unfortunate for the great people of the UK
LEAVITT: This is a leftist propaganda machine that unfortunately is subsidized by British taxpayers, and he thinks that's extremely unfortunate for the great people of the UK
November 12, 2025 at 6:42 PM
Q: Is the president prepared to bankrupt the BBC?
LEAVITT: This is a leftist propaganda machine that unfortunately is subsidized by British taxpayers, and he thinks that's extremely unfortunate for the great people of the UK
LEAVITT: This is a leftist propaganda machine that unfortunately is subsidized by British taxpayers, and he thinks that's extremely unfortunate for the great people of the UK
Reposted by TheRealSparky💙🐸🇺🇸
JIANG: Did the president ever spend hours at Epstein's house with a victim?
LEAVITT: These emails prove absolutely nothing, other than the fact that President Trump did nothing wrong
LEAVITT: These emails prove absolutely nothing, other than the fact that President Trump did nothing wrong
November 12, 2025 at 6:42 PM
JIANG: Did the president ever spend hours at Epstein's house with a victim?
LEAVITT: These emails prove absolutely nothing, other than the fact that President Trump did nothing wrong
LEAVITT: These emails prove absolutely nothing, other than the fact that President Trump did nothing wrong
Reposted by TheRealSparky💙🐸🇺🇸
Q: In the interests of transparency, why not just go ahead and release the full Epstein files?
LEAVITT: This administration has done more with respect to Epstein transparency than any administration ever
LEAVITT: This administration has done more with respect to Epstein transparency than any administration ever
November 12, 2025 at 6:43 PM
Q: In the interests of transparency, why not just go ahead and release the full Epstein files?
LEAVITT: This administration has done more with respect to Epstein transparency than any administration ever
LEAVITT: This administration has done more with respect to Epstein transparency than any administration ever
Reposted by TheRealSparky💙🐸🇺🇸
Leavitt on Epstein: "This is truly a manufactured hoax by the Democrat Party"
November 12, 2025 at 6:44 PM
Leavitt on Epstein: "This is truly a manufactured hoax by the Democrat Party"
Reposted by TheRealSparky💙🐸🇺🇸
Q: Given you answers about transparency, why are WH officials meeting with Boebert in an effort to get her to not sign the Epstein files petition?
LEAVITT: Doesn't it show transparency that members of the Trump administration are willing to brief members of Congress?
LEAVITT: Doesn't it show transparency that members of the Trump administration are willing to brief members of Congress?
November 12, 2025 at 6:45 PM
Q: Given you answers about transparency, why are WH officials meeting with Boebert in an effort to get her to not sign the Epstein files petition?
LEAVITT: Doesn't it show transparency that members of the Trump administration are willing to brief members of Congress?
LEAVITT: Doesn't it show transparency that members of the Trump administration are willing to brief members of Congress?
Reposted by TheRealSparky💙🐸🇺🇸
Q: You said one of the costs of the shutdown was people missing their SNAP benefits. Can you explain then why the administration went to court to fight the funding of SNAP?
LEAVITT: Recipients missed their SNAP benefits because Democrats shut the government down. Then you had an unhinged judge ...
LEAVITT: Recipients missed their SNAP benefits because Democrats shut the government down. Then you had an unhinged judge ...
November 12, 2025 at 6:49 PM
Q: You said one of the costs of the shutdown was people missing their SNAP benefits. Can you explain then why the administration went to court to fight the funding of SNAP?
LEAVITT: Recipients missed their SNAP benefits because Democrats shut the government down. Then you had an unhinged judge ...
LEAVITT: Recipients missed their SNAP benefits because Democrats shut the government down. Then you had an unhinged judge ...