Constitutional Commentary, U of MN Law School
@concomm.bsky.social
Constitutional Commentary was founded in 1984 and is one of the few faculty-edited law journals in the country. It enjoys a wide following among legal scholars, historians, political scientists, and others interested in constitutional law and history.
Now online: David S. Schwartz discusses the impact of Creative 303 and related cases in his article Making Sense of 303 Creative: A Free Speech Solution in Search of a Problem. constitutionalcommentary.lib.umn.edu/wp-content/u...
@ConstComm @UofMNLawSchool
@ConstComm @UofMNLawSchool
constitutionalcommentary.lib.umn.edu
April 24, 2025 at 7:26 PM
Now online: David S. Schwartz discusses the impact of Creative 303 and related cases in his article Making Sense of 303 Creative: A Free Speech Solution in Search of a Problem. constitutionalcommentary.lib.umn.edu/wp-content/u...
@ConstComm @UofMNLawSchool
@ConstComm @UofMNLawSchool
Ready for a First Look: David Driesen’s article, Does a Removal Power Exist? Joseph Story and Selective Living Originalism, analyzing Story’s concept of removing executive officers found in his Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States
constitutionalcommentary.lib.umn.edu/wp-content/u...
constitutionalcommentary.lib.umn.edu/wp-content/u...
constitutionalcommentary.lib.umn.edu
April 24, 2025 at 7:22 PM
Ready for a First Look: David Driesen’s article, Does a Removal Power Exist? Joseph Story and Selective Living Originalism, analyzing Story’s concept of removing executive officers found in his Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States
constitutionalcommentary.lib.umn.edu/wp-content/u...
constitutionalcommentary.lib.umn.edu/wp-content/u...
Missed the student law review submission cycle? Constitutional Commentary is now reading submissions of short(ish) con law articles that fit our “shorter and less ponderous” format. Click here for details. constitutionalcommentary.lib.umn.edu/submissions/
Submissions – Constitutional Commentary
constitutionalcommentary.lib.umn.edu
March 26, 2025 at 3:53 AM
Missed the student law review submission cycle? Constitutional Commentary is now reading submissions of short(ish) con law articles that fit our “shorter and less ponderous” format. Click here for details. constitutionalcommentary.lib.umn.edu/submissions/
Reposted by Constitutional Commentary, U of MN Law School
This was a really great conversation. Many thanks for LMVMN for having me! www.youtube.com/watch?v=gpFI...
February 26, 2025 at 1:59 PM
This was a really great conversation. Many thanks for LMVMN for having me! www.youtube.com/watch?v=gpFI...
Reposted by Constitutional Commentary, U of MN Law School
Am looking forward to a virtual discussion at 7 PM CT on Tuesday with the League of Women Voters of Minnesota on "Can the President Do That? Understanding Executive Power and State Protections." You can register below. www.lwvmn.org/events
February 23, 2025 at 11:24 PM
Am looking forward to a virtual discussion at 7 PM CT on Tuesday with the League of Women Voters of Minnesota on "Can the President Do That? Understanding Executive Power and State Protections." You can register below. www.lwvmn.org/events
Read Conor Casey’s review of Constitutional Essentials, a work that distills the framework developed by political and legal philosopher John Rawls to offer “guidance for the project of liberal constitutional democracy.”
constitutionalcommentary.lib.umn.edu/article/poli...
constitutionalcommentary.lib.umn.edu/article/poli...
January 24, 2025 at 4:43 AM
Read Conor Casey’s review of Constitutional Essentials, a work that distills the framework developed by political and legal philosopher John Rawls to offer “guidance for the project of liberal constitutional democracy.”
constitutionalcommentary.lib.umn.edu/article/poli...
constitutionalcommentary.lib.umn.edu/article/poli...
New from Constitutional Commentary: Samuel Moyn and Rephael Stern take a deep look at how James Bradley Thayer (1831–1902) sought to save democracy through judicial self-restraint—and how his efforts ultimately failed.
constitutionalcommentary.lib.umn.edu/article/4810/
constitutionalcommentary.lib.umn.edu/article/4810/
January 24, 2025 at 4:32 AM
New from Constitutional Commentary: Samuel Moyn and Rephael Stern take a deep look at how James Bradley Thayer (1831–1902) sought to save democracy through judicial self-restraint—and how his efforts ultimately failed.
constitutionalcommentary.lib.umn.edu/article/4810/
constitutionalcommentary.lib.umn.edu/article/4810/
Check out our new and forthcoming publications with First Look.
constitutionalcommentary.lib.umn.edu/first-look/
constitutionalcommentary.lib.umn.edu/first-look/
December 27, 2024 at 7:01 AM
Check out our new and forthcoming publications with First Look.
constitutionalcommentary.lib.umn.edu/first-look/
constitutionalcommentary.lib.umn.edu/first-look/
The latest from Constitutional Commentary – read it here before the print edition is available:
constitutionalcommentary.lib.umn.edu
constitutionalcommentary.lib.umn.edu
December 27, 2024 at 6:59 AM
The latest from Constitutional Commentary – read it here before the print edition is available:
constitutionalcommentary.lib.umn.edu
constitutionalcommentary.lib.umn.edu