Beau Baumann 🍎
banner
beaubaumann.bsky.social
Beau Baumann 🍎
@beaubaumann.bsky.social
Yale Law PhD candidate. Admin law/legislation/separation of powers/immigration. Article I extremist.

. . . Also, vintage menswear enthusiast . . .
Pinned
Getting our walk on
?!?!?!?
February 13, 2026 at 8:32 PM
Hagiography leads to a natural question of “hey if this guy was so important, and I look outside and everything is shit, was he really so great?”
The Scalia Revolution
Antonin Scalia's legacy ten years after his death.
reason.com
February 13, 2026 at 8:26 PM
Seems like a day to remind everyone that I made my bones as an academic by being Noemi Rao’s biggest hater. Truly a worst case scenario is her on SCOTUS. I.e., stupidest flavor of evil among likely nominees. I think there’s a section of her wiki page dedicated to me calling her a punk ass.
February 13, 2026 at 5:55 PM
Anyone but Rao. Jfc.
Either Mascott or Rao seem plausible to me. Rao's history on the bench is certainly more Trumpy than most of his first-term appointments.
February 13, 2026 at 5:47 PM
Just kill me
February 13, 2026 at 12:04 AM
“Violence has always been the core of law’s unspoken grammar. What has changed is not the weapon, but where it is aimed. Techniques once reserved primarily for those presumed to sit outside of racial, citizenship, and property boundaries now travel inward[.]” 😮‍💨
February 12, 2026 at 3:01 PM
Me, alone in the library, pondering the big questions: “how does one ~own~ pajama day?”
February 12, 2026 at 12:37 PM
I am willing to admit that presidentialism is the greater short-term threat. But, god help me, I find juristocracy to be just a risible affront to the the project of self rule. Why do we care what these morons in robes think? It’s just a glaring indictment of our belief in our own capacities.
February 11, 2026 at 11:06 PM
I track when I’m cited by administrators and legislators. That to me is worth a million scotus citations.
Am I the only one who thinks it’s a cause of doubt, not certainty, when judges enter the scholarly fray and support an argument?
February 11, 2026 at 1:50 PM
Am I the only one who thinks it’s a cause of doubt, not certainty, when judges enter the scholarly fray and support an argument?
February 11, 2026 at 1:39 PM
Reposted by Beau Baumann 🍎
My article, "The Unitary Executive and Politics," is officially published in the Ohio Northern University Law Review. I thank the editors at ONU for their assistance and hard work!

Read it and cite it!

papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
papers.ssrn.com
February 11, 2026 at 1:34 AM
Reposted by Beau Baumann 🍎
apples
/ \
/ \
/ \
/ \
/ \
like dem don't like dem
February 10, 2026 at 5:59 AM
Reposted by Beau Baumann 🍎
This article is sure to become a must-cite in unitary executive debates!
1/x Really delighted to say that my coauthored piece with @jedshug.bsky.social, “Quasi-Judicial: A History and Tradition” just landed with the Columbia Law Review. We really appreciate the editors’ hard work! This is a piece that retells the story of American admin law and Humphrey’s Executor.
February 10, 2026 at 12:17 AM
Woot! Woot! 🤘
I'm proud to announce that I have defended my finance dissertation and that this summer I will become an Assistant Professor of Law at the University of Texas at Austin! Most of all, I would like to thank Roberta Romano, whose JD-PhD program in finance changed my career.
February 9, 2026 at 9:45 PM
Reposted by Beau Baumann 🍎
Congratulations to @uofoklahomalaw.bsky.social Prof. Michael Smith @msmith750.bsky.social for having his article, “In Praise of Generative AI,” accepted for publication by the Iowa Law Review!

Check out the draft here: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
February 9, 2026 at 5:43 PM
Today’s a Ralph ruck w/ a Ralph shirt
February 9, 2026 at 5:25 PM
Reposted by Beau Baumann 🍎
1/x Really delighted to say that my coauthored piece with @jedshug.bsky.social, “Quasi-Judicial: A History and Tradition” just landed with the Columbia Law Review. We really appreciate the editors’ hard work! This is a piece that retells the story of American admin law and Humphrey’s Executor.
February 9, 2026 at 2:54 PM
This paper has placed with Columbia. Its little sibling article is still up for grabs for the enterprising law journal! They are deeply intertwined and recast the history of American admin law.
February 9, 2026 at 5:09 PM
Reposted by Beau Baumann 🍎
Great pick up by the Columbia Law Review — and bravo to @beaubaumann.bsky.social and @jedshug.bsky.social! It’s a great and important piece. And another reminder that the federal government has simply never been the hierarchically-structured pyramid the Roberts Court and Trump claim it is.
1/x Really delighted to say that my coauthored piece with @jedshug.bsky.social, “Quasi-Judicial: A History and Tradition” just landed with the Columbia Law Review. We really appreciate the editors’ hard work! This is a piece that retells the story of American admin law and Humphrey’s Executor.
February 9, 2026 at 3:48 PM
I was extra influenced by @emilysbremer.bsky.social , who is in my opinion the dean of the quasi-judicial category. She has a new piece out with my the chair of my PhD Committee, ~Wild~ Bill Eskridge , that would be well worth your time.
February 9, 2026 at 3:15 PM
1/x Really delighted to say that my coauthored piece with @jedshug.bsky.social, “Quasi-Judicial: A History and Tradition” just landed with the Columbia Law Review. We really appreciate the editors’ hard work! This is a piece that retells the story of American admin law and Humphrey’s Executor.
February 9, 2026 at 2:54 PM
“But the children 😖”

Harv:
February 9, 2026 at 12:59 PM
Subzero church fit
February 8, 2026 at 5:23 PM
Ready for -15 degrees
February 7, 2026 at 3:18 PM
David French need to read more people like Vermeule on the “maximalist” unitary executive. A vision of a state that is the manifestation of presidential will has been there since the beginning.
Blaming the Judiciary
Podcast Episode · Advisory Opinions · 02/03/2026 · 1h 4m
podcasts.apple.com
February 6, 2026 at 9:16 PM