LightNews LightNews
alexiamaddox.bsky.social
@alexiamaddox.bsky.social
50 followers 31 following 2 posts
Sociologist of technology. Interested in digital frontiers (AI, immersive environments, web3 and internet futures). Research methods, community studies and sociotechnical transformations are her bedrock.
Posts Replies Media Videos
Reposted
joshtaylor.bsky.social
These are the various trials:
It is, of course, for the evaluation design phase to specify the exact approaches to testing, but from experience of undertaking testing elsewhere, it is anticipated that the following description of how the tests are likely to be deployed for each technology are as follows: a) Age verification methods - Ensure that users are accurately verified as being above or below a required age threshold using valid identity documents or other verification methods. This will involve document verification testing using a dataset of 4,000+ legitimate, fake, and altered identity documents (e.g., passports, driver's licenses) from various regions, nationally and internationally. The documents are presented to the UX gateway for participant age assurance providers evaluate whether the system correctly accepts valid documents and rejects fraudulent or tampered ones. There will also be tests with documents that are worn, slightly damaged or poorly scanned to assess how tolerant the system is to imperfect inputs. The Project Team will perform security testing to identify vulnerabilities that could allow users to bypass verification, including biometric comparisons and deep fake and video injection presentation attack. b) Age estimation methods - Test the system’s ability to estimate a user's age based on biological or behavioural features that vary with age. The Project Team’s existing test datasets will be augmented with additional images of users of varying ages, ethnicities and genders which reflect the full diversity of the Australian population (27.6% of whom were born overseas), including highquality and lower-quality images (e.g., different lighting conditions, angles and facial expressions). The images will be uploaded and the systems checked to see how accurately it estimates age, comparing the results with the actual ages and perform tests with both static photos and real-time camera feeds. The Project Team will also explore voice, hand geometry or typing speed analysis, tes… d) Parental Consent Technology – The Project will examine whether parental consent systems accurately verify a parent or guardian’s identity and relationship to the child before granting access to services. This includes simulating different parent-child relationships, testing various identity verification methods (e.g., credit card verification, email, document upload). The Project Team will also test for cases like foster parents, legal guardians, or step-parents to ensure the system accommodates complex family structures. This will include simulated requests for access from children of different ages and assess how the system handles multiple requests, including revoking Document Sensitivity: Public Page 42 of 52 D6.1 - Project Plan consent and there will be attempts to simulate potential fraudulent behaviour, such as children trying to impersonate parents, or bad-actors seeking to groom children through offers of fraudulent parental consent. Ensure the system is resistant to such efforts. e) Parental Control Technology – The Project Team will test how effectively parental control technologies can limit access to content or services based on a child’s age and how parents can monitor or restrict activity. This involves creating test user accounts for different age groups and test access to restricted services (e.g. age-restricted content or apps) and examine if content is appropriately filtered or blocked based on user profiles. The Team will test different levels of parental controls, from time restrictions to content categories and evaluate how easy it is for parents to configure these settings. The Team will examine how intuitive the parental control interface is for setting restrictions, monitoring activity and receiving notifications, ensuring parents can reasonably easily modify settings without the need for technical expertise. This includes simulated attempts by children to bypass parental controls (e.g. changing settings or creating fake accounts) to as…
January 15, 2025 at 4:28 AM
alexiamaddox.bsky.social
Just discussed Meta's content moderation changes on EastFM! While fact-checking changes may not hit Australia yet, the broader content shifts likely will. What I loved? We focused on what people can actually DO about these changes.

🎙️ Listen: eastsidefm.org/episodes/173... (1:02:00)
Drive - Friday - 10, January 2025
Listen to Drive - Friday
eastsidefm.org
January 12, 2025 at 9:46 PM
Reposted
caseynewton.bsky.social
NEW: Meta just killed its diversity, equity and inclusion program. Employees aren't buying the company's argument that it's the result of a 'shifting legal landscape.' What they're saying inside the company ➡️ www.platformer.news/meta-kills-d...
Another employee noted in an internal post how reactive the company had become, dramatically changing policies and positions based on one relatively close election. "It's a bit crazy, just thinking that if the election result was different — none of this would happen? Does it mean we were doing things that we did not believe in? Are we going to have such big changes every time power shifts?" Responded another employee: "Apparently the current direction of the wind is the way we 'lean in.'"
January 10, 2025 at 6:39 PM
Reposted
dwillner.bsky.social
Folks are mostly missing the forest for the trees re: the recent Meta announcement. Specifically, the focus on the move from fact checking to community notes. There two different changes that are a much bigger deal that have received less focus. 🧵 1/11
January 9, 2025 at 8:29 PM