adn 👣
@adnrv.bsky.social
adin meets the blue sky 👁️🤖💻📚
Prof. at IFI UiO DSB
#CV and #ML (mostly)
Prof. at IFI UiO DSB
#CV and #ML (mostly)
Pinned
adn 👣
@adnrv.bsky.social
· Nov 28
"Read papers with the mindset: Why are these lying bastards lying to me?" -- David Forsyth
www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Y7N...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Y7N...
Reposted by adn 👣
(4/4) I must say I was quite frustrated by this situation.
And I still feel the system is not fair. There are surely many researchers experiencing the same situation today.
Finally, I was invited to become an AE for JMLR in 2020 and for TMLR in 2022. And for the latter, I am grateful to you!
And I still feel the system is not fair. There are surely many researchers experiencing the same situation today.
Finally, I was invited to become an AE for JMLR in 2020 and for TMLR in 2022. And for the latter, I am grateful to you!
January 20, 2026 at 2:46 AM
(4/4) I must say I was quite frustrated by this situation.
And I still feel the system is not fair. There are surely many researchers experiencing the same situation today.
Finally, I was invited to become an AE for JMLR in 2020 and for TMLR in 2022. And for the latter, I am grateful to you!
And I still feel the system is not fair. There are surely many researchers experiencing the same situation today.
Finally, I was invited to become an AE for JMLR in 2020 and for TMLR in 2022. And for the latter, I am grateful to you!
Reposted by adn 👣
(3/4) I reviewed up to 35 journal papers a year.
Yet, none of these editors bothered asking me to join the editorial board or the journals.
Rather, many of them invited their own PhD students, younger than me, less experienced, to join the board as Associate Editors.
Yet, none of these editors bothered asking me to join the editorial board or the journals.
Rather, many of them invited their own PhD students, younger than me, less experienced, to join the board as Associate Editors.
January 20, 2026 at 2:45 AM
(3/4) I reviewed up to 35 journal papers a year.
Yet, none of these editors bothered asking me to join the editorial board or the journals.
Rather, many of them invited their own PhD students, younger than me, less experienced, to join the board as Associate Editors.
Yet, none of these editors bothered asking me to join the editorial board or the journals.
Rather, many of them invited their own PhD students, younger than me, less experienced, to join the board as Associate Editors.
Reposted by adn 👣
We didn't submit to CVPR this year, but as an AC I am happy that the rebuttal is a 1 page pdf. Let the burden be on the authors to compress and find what is important, and not on the reviewers+AC to read tons of material.
(My opinion always was the same when being an author)
(My opinion always was the same when being an author)
January 20, 2026 at 7:58 AM
We didn't submit to CVPR this year, but as an AC I am happy that the rebuttal is a 1 page pdf. Let the burden be on the authors to compress and find what is important, and not on the reviewers+AC to read tons of material.
(My opinion always was the same when being an author)
(My opinion always was the same when being an author)
Reposted by adn 👣
As an AC, I try to prevent this pre-rebuttal and remind reviewers that rebuttal space is limited. But some people are irritatingly stubborn.
January 20, 2026 at 8:24 AM
As an AC, I try to prevent this pre-rebuttal and remind reviewers that rebuttal space is limited. But some people are irritatingly stubborn.
Reposted by adn 👣
Agreed, but.
The reviewer: Here is an assortment of 20 things I do not like about the paper, in random order, things big and small. Suggestions for the rebuttal: See weaknesses. Post rebuttal: The authors addressed items 1-19 but not item 20. Reject.
The reviewer: Here is an assortment of 20 things I do not like about the paper, in random order, things big and small. Suggestions for the rebuttal: See weaknesses. Post rebuttal: The authors addressed items 1-19 but not item 20. Reject.
January 20, 2026 at 8:24 AM
Agreed, but.
The reviewer: Here is an assortment of 20 things I do not like about the paper, in random order, things big and small. Suggestions for the rebuttal: See weaknesses. Post rebuttal: The authors addressed items 1-19 but not item 20. Reject.
The reviewer: Here is an assortment of 20 things I do not like about the paper, in random order, things big and small. Suggestions for the rebuttal: See weaknesses. Post rebuttal: The authors addressed items 1-19 but not item 20. Reject.
Reposted by adn 👣
👋 Meet the ELLIS Board!
This episode features @lawrennd.bsky.social, DeepMind Professor of ML at @cam.ac.uk 🇬🇧.
He shares perspectives on AGI timelines, data vs. algorithms, and why progress in AI should be judged by its impact on people and society.
Watch the video 👉 youtu.be/uxtVA5fMQZQ
This episode features @lawrennd.bsky.social, DeepMind Professor of ML at @cam.ac.uk 🇬🇧.
He shares perspectives on AGI timelines, data vs. algorithms, and why progress in AI should be judged by its impact on people and society.
Watch the video 👉 youtu.be/uxtVA5fMQZQ
Meet the Board: Neil Lawrence (ELLIS Board Member | DeepMind Professor, University of Cambridge)
YouTube video by ELLIS
youtu.be
January 20, 2026 at 8:59 AM
👋 Meet the ELLIS Board!
This episode features @lawrennd.bsky.social, DeepMind Professor of ML at @cam.ac.uk 🇬🇧.
He shares perspectives on AGI timelines, data vs. algorithms, and why progress in AI should be judged by its impact on people and society.
Watch the video 👉 youtu.be/uxtVA5fMQZQ
This episode features @lawrennd.bsky.social, DeepMind Professor of ML at @cam.ac.uk 🇬🇧.
He shares perspectives on AGI timelines, data vs. algorithms, and why progress in AI should be judged by its impact on people and society.
Watch the video 👉 youtu.be/uxtVA5fMQZQ
Reposted by adn 👣
The Nobel peace prize episode is going to be looked upon by historians as among peak idiocy of the 21st century.
Change my mind.
Change my mind.
January 17, 2026 at 10:02 AM
The Nobel peace prize episode is going to be looked upon by historians as among peak idiocy of the 21st century.
Change my mind.
Change my mind.
Reposted by adn 👣
Get feedback on your #ICML2026 submission from Google's Gemini-based paper assistant tool, an advanced LLM tool specialized to assist with ICML submissions. Live now!
More details in the following blog post: blog.icml.cc/2026/01/14/i...
More details in the following blog post: blog.icml.cc/2026/01/14/i...
January 14, 2026 at 4:57 PM
Get feedback on your #ICML2026 submission from Google's Gemini-based paper assistant tool, an advanced LLM tool specialized to assist with ICML submissions. Live now!
More details in the following blog post: blog.icml.cc/2026/01/14/i...
More details in the following blog post: blog.icml.cc/2026/01/14/i...
Reposted by adn 👣
Announcing the #ICML2026 policy for self-ranking in reviews!
1. Authors rank their submissions
2. Reviews are submitted
3. The "Isotonic Mechanism" is run on rankings and review scores
4. Large discrepancies are flagged to ACs and SAC
CC @wjsu.bsky.social
Post: blog.icml.cc/2026/01/12/i...
1. Authors rank their submissions
2. Reviews are submitted
3. The "Isotonic Mechanism" is run on rankings and review scores
4. Large discrepancies are flagged to ACs and SAC
CC @wjsu.bsky.social
Post: blog.icml.cc/2026/01/12/i...
January 12, 2026 at 3:06 PM
Announcing the #ICML2026 policy for self-ranking in reviews!
1. Authors rank their submissions
2. Reviews are submitted
3. The "Isotonic Mechanism" is run on rankings and review scores
4. Large discrepancies are flagged to ACs and SAC
CC @wjsu.bsky.social
Post: blog.icml.cc/2026/01/12/i...
1. Authors rank their submissions
2. Reviews are submitted
3. The "Isotonic Mechanism" is run on rankings and review scores
4. Large discrepancies are flagged to ACs and SAC
CC @wjsu.bsky.social
Post: blog.icml.cc/2026/01/12/i...
Reposted by adn 👣
We all know Clarke's "sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic"
Well we have corollary:
Well we have corollary:
December 12, 2025 at 2:25 AM
We all know Clarke's "sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic"
Well we have corollary:
Well we have corollary:
This should be move up in the selection criteria.
I will be planning my year around EurIPS, it seems 🍻
I will be planning my year around EurIPS, it seems 🍻
December 12, 2025 at 2:07 PM
This should be move up in the selection criteria.
I will be planning my year around EurIPS, it seems 🍻
I will be planning my year around EurIPS, it seems 🍻
Reposted by adn 👣
Coming off the #EurIPS high — let’s keep the momentum going!
👀 We’re looking for a host team + venue for EurIPS 2026 that can support a unified budget, big workshop participation & smooth logistics.
❗Deadline: Jan 15th
🔎Details: https://bit.ly/4q4OrXO
👀 We’re looking for a host team + venue for EurIPS 2026 that can support a unified budget, big workshop participation & smooth logistics.
❗Deadline: Jan 15th
🔎Details: https://bit.ly/4q4OrXO
December 12, 2025 at 1:37 PM
Coming off the #EurIPS high — let’s keep the momentum going!
👀 We’re looking for a host team + venue for EurIPS 2026 that can support a unified budget, big workshop participation & smooth logistics.
❗Deadline: Jan 15th
🔎Details: https://bit.ly/4q4OrXO
👀 We’re looking for a host team + venue for EurIPS 2026 that can support a unified budget, big workshop participation & smooth logistics.
❗Deadline: Jan 15th
🔎Details: https://bit.ly/4q4OrXO
Reposted by adn 👣
Funny paradox: if an LLM can do peer review, then by definition of "peer", AGI has been achieved and there's no need to pursue research in that direction. Ergo, LLMs don't need to review.
Ok, I have a strong opinion on this, perhaps you can convince me otherwise: if you need an LLM to understand a paper for reviewing, perhaps you should not be a reviewer.
And your argument is saved time, then perhaps you planned to not read all the details. Then again, you should not be a reviewer.
And your argument is saved time, then perhaps you planned to not read all the details. Then again, you should not be a reviewer.
December 12, 2025 at 11:07 AM
Funny paradox: if an LLM can do peer review, then by definition of "peer", AGI has been achieved and there's no need to pursue research in that direction. Ergo, LLMs don't need to review.
Reposted by adn 👣
ICML 2026 is piloting a new policy on LLMs for reviewing. Both authors and reviewers choose whether limited or no LLM use is allowed in reviews, and are matched accordingly.
But: authors who say no LLMs must also review with no LLMs.
Chairs made a super thoughtful blog post!
But: authors who say no LLMs must also review with no LLMs.
Chairs made a super thoughtful blog post!
Announcing the ICML 2026 policy for LLMs in reviewing! Reviewers and authors both pick either conservative or permissive LLM use, and will be matched accordingly. Importantly: authors on papers who choose conservative must obey the conservative policy as reviewers.
December 11, 2025 at 4:03 PM
ICML 2026 is piloting a new policy on LLMs for reviewing. Both authors and reviewers choose whether limited or no LLM use is allowed in reviews, and are matched accordingly.
But: authors who say no LLMs must also review with no LLMs.
Chairs made a super thoughtful blog post!
But: authors who say no LLMs must also review with no LLMs.
Chairs made a super thoughtful blog post!
Reposted by adn 👣
UPDATE: I'm going to serve as Technical Chair of #ECCV2026 @eccv.bsky.social
a sign that says " new challenger approaching " with an exclamation point
ALT: a sign that says " new challenger approaching " with an exclamation point
media.tenor.com
December 11, 2025 at 7:50 AM
UPDATE: I'm going to serve as Technical Chair of #ECCV2026 @eccv.bsky.social
Reposted by adn 👣
The final day of NeurIPS 2025 is here! Workshops and competitions are in full swing as researchers tackle focused challenges and explore specialized topics. Finishing strong in San Diego! #NeurIPS2025 #NeurIPSanDiego
December 7, 2025 at 5:45 PM
The final day of NeurIPS 2025 is here! Workshops and competitions are in full swing as researchers tackle focused challenges and explore specialized topics. Finishing strong in San Diego! #NeurIPS2025 #NeurIPSanDiego
Reposted by adn 👣
It’s the last day of #EurIPS, and we are ending it all with another 9 amazing workshops organized by our fantastic community members.
Similar to yesterday, the workshops will be at Bella Centeret, the ITU campus, and the UCPH south campus, so double check the program
Similar to yesterday, the workshops will be at Bella Centeret, the ITU campus, and the UCPH south campus, so double check the program
December 7, 2025 at 6:45 AM
It’s the last day of #EurIPS, and we are ending it all with another 9 amazing workshops organized by our fantastic community members.
Similar to yesterday, the workshops will be at Bella Centeret, the ITU campus, and the UCPH south campus, so double check the program
Similar to yesterday, the workshops will be at Bella Centeret, the ITU campus, and the UCPH south campus, so double check the program
Reposted by adn 👣
In 2026, all three of the major ML conferences will be in incredible locations:
- #ICLR2026 in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- #ICML2026 in Seoul, South Korea
- #NeurIPS2026 in Sydney, Australia
Which one do you want to go to the most?
- #ICLR2026 in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- #ICML2026 in Seoul, South Korea
- #NeurIPS2026 in Sydney, Australia
Which one do you want to go to the most?
#NeurIPS2026 will be held in Sydney, Australia!
#ICML2017 was also in Sydney and was an absolute blast
#ICML2017 was also in Sydney and was an absolute blast
December 6, 2025 at 4:31 PM
In 2026, all three of the major ML conferences will be in incredible locations:
- #ICLR2026 in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- #ICML2026 in Seoul, South Korea
- #NeurIPS2026 in Sydney, Australia
Which one do you want to go to the most?
- #ICLR2026 in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- #ICML2026 in Seoul, South Korea
- #NeurIPS2026 in Sydney, Australia
Which one do you want to go to the most?
Reposted by adn 👣
#NeurIPS2026 will be held in Sydney, Australia!
#ICML2017 was also in Sydney and was an absolute blast
#ICML2017 was also in Sydney and was an absolute blast
December 6, 2025 at 3:41 AM
#NeurIPS2026 will be held in Sydney, Australia!
#ICML2017 was also in Sydney and was an absolute blast
#ICML2017 was also in Sydney and was an absolute blast
Reposted by adn 👣
We are off to a great start with our first set of 9 #EurIPS workshops! the lecture rooms are buzzing and conversations are flowing at our three different workshop locations!
December 6, 2025 at 9:49 AM
We are off to a great start with our first set of 9 #EurIPS workshops! the lecture rooms are buzzing and conversations are flowing at our three different workshop locations!
Reposted by adn 👣
You pay after the paper is accepted, that's a big difference. Here, you pay to put a coin in the machine. I can see public accountants saying this is not ok.
December 5, 2025 at 6:42 AM
You pay after the paper is accepted, that's a big difference. Here, you pay to put a coin in the machine. I can see public accountants saying this is not ok.
Now, we are cooking. Listen to this man 👇
Maybe charge over a certain number of papers per author?
December 5, 2025 at 8:06 PM
Now, we are cooking. Listen to this man 👇