Text SIGN PSBFXZ to 50409 — Despite you lot giving ICE a larger budget than one of the top 3 largest militaries in the world, ICE stopped paying for detainee medical treatment in October. Nearly doubling (reported, not disappeared) detainees from 2025, ICE has experienced a rash of inmate deaths. 35 that they feel comfortable sharing, but the true numbers may not come to light for years because this administration has intentionally obfuscated records of arrests, transfers, and deportations. ICE allows abuse, medical neglect, inhumane conditions, starvation, and solitary confinement in their facilities, which is how concentration camps in Germany also started out. Death by negligence and inhumanity came a full decade before the ovens and gas chambers. Considering you all signed off on the Big Beautiful Bill, they should be more than able to cover things like medical care, food, clothing, and medical staff. They should be staffed enough to allow detainees due process and attorney privileges, but these constitutional rights have been taken from all of these people, too. Do not ever again speak about constitutional rights again if you are unwilling to stand up and protect them from clear evil. Unless you want your legacy to be forever tied to America’s deadly concentration camps in history books, halt all ICE operations and investigations and funding immediately.

Text SIGN PGBRKX to 50409 to send this to your officials.

Text SIGN PGJEEK to 50409 — Recent reporting has revealed that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) issued a secret internal memo dated May 12, 2025, authorizing agents to forcibly enter private homes without a judicial warrant, relying instead on administrative warrants issued within the executive branch. This policy violates the Fourth Amendment. For more than four decades, Supreme Court precedent has drawn a “firm line at the entrance to the house.” In Payton v. New York, the Court held that law enforcement may not enter a home to make an arrest without a warrant issued by a neutral and detached judicial officer, absent narrow, case-specific exceptions such as consent or true exigent circumstances. Administrative convenience, internal authorization, or asserted probable cause by officers in the field are not sufficient. ICE’s reported guidance attempts to erase that constitutional line by substituting executive-branch paperwork for judicial authorization. Administrative warrants—signed by immigration officers who are employees of the enforcing agency—are not judicial warrants. They do not satisfy the Fourth Amendment requirement that a judge independently assess probable cause before the government crosses the threshold of a home. The memo itself reportedly acknowledges that the Department of Homeland Security “has not historically relied on administrative warrants alone” to enter residences. Nevertheless, it asserts that DHS lawyers now believe the Constitution does not prohibit such entries. That claim directly contradicts controlling Supreme Court law, including Payton and Steagald v. United States, which makes clear that even a valid arrest warrant does not grant law enforcement a general license to enter homes without judicial authorization. Equally troubling is how this policy was handled. According to whistleblower disclosures, the memo was not formally distributed, was conveyed largely through verbal briefings, and agents were instructed to read and return the document. This extraordinary secrecy raises serious concerns about whether ICE leadership understood the guidance would not withstand judicial or congressional scrutiny. Exceptions to the warrant requirement—such as consent or exigent circumstances—are narrow, fact-specific doctrines. They cannot be transformed into a standing policy authorizing forced home entry as a routine enforcement practice. An emergency cannot be declared by memo, and necessity cannot be institutionalized to bypass constitutional limits. If allowed to stand, this policy would normalize warrantless home entry by federal agents and undermine one of the Constitution’s most fundamental protections. Once the Fourth Amendment’s protections at the home’s threshold are weakened, the damage will not be confined to immigration enforcement. Congress has both the authority and the obligation to act. We urge you to: 1. Publicly repudiate ICE’s reliance on administrative warrants for home entry as inconsistent with the Fourth Amendment. 2. Conduct immediate oversight and investigation into the drafting, legal review, approval, dissemination, and implementation of the May 12, 2025 memo, including holding responsible officials accountable through removal from leadership roles, disciplinary action, and referral for appropriate consequences where warranted. 3. Enact statutory safeguards explicitly prohibiting ICE and DHS from entering homes without a judicial warrant. 4. Use Congress’s power of the purse to condition funding on full compliance with Fourth Amendment requirements. 5. Replace and reform ICE to ensure constitutional limits are respected, enforced, and institutionalized. The Fourth Amendment is not optional. It cannot be rewritten by internal memoranda or displaced by administrative forms. Congress must act now to stop an unconstitutional practice before it becomes entrenched as standard operating procedure.

Text SIGN PZGRYQ to 50409 to send this to your officials.

Text SIGN POMNSN to 50409 — President Donald J. Trump has escalated from inflammatory rhetoric to explicit threats against a NATO ally and its autonomous territory, Greenland. These threats now include economic coercion, alliance pressure, and refusal to rule out the use of force. Congress must intervene immediately. Multiple outlets, including Bloomberg, PBS NewsHour, the BBC, and The Atlantic, have confirmed the authenticity of a message distributed by the U.S. National Security Council to European governments, originally sent by President Trump to Norway’s prime minister. In that message, the President asserted that the United States must have “complete and total control of Greenland,” rejected Denmark’s sovereignty over the territory, and explicitly linked his foreign-policy posture to resentment over not receiving the Nobel Peace Prize. These claims are demonstrably false and profoundly dangerous. Greenland is a self-governing territory within the Kingdom of Denmark, a founding member of NATO. Danish sovereignty over Greenland is well established in international law and has been formally recognized by the United States for decades, including through bilateral defense agreements. The President has justified his threats by claiming Greenland must be seized to prevent Russian or Chinese aggression. This argument is fundamentally incoherent. Greenland is already protected by NATO. The entire purpose of the alliance is collective defense: any attack on Denmark or Greenland would trigger a unified response. By threatening a NATO ally, the President is not strengthening deterrence—he is destroying it. If the United States attacks or coerces its own allies, the alliance ceases to function, and the very risks the President claims to fear become more likely, not less. The President has also confirmed his intent to impose tariffs on allied nations and to use NATO obligations as leverage for territorial demands. European leaders and industry groups have warned that these actions risk a trade war and permanent damage to transatlantic security cooperation. Denmark has now begun reinforcing its military presence in Greenland in response to U.S. threats—an extraordinary and alarming development between allies. Congress cannot dismiss this as bluster. The Constitution assigns Congress authority over war, trade, and appropriations precisely to prevent reckless or personal decision-making from dragging the nation into conflict. Allowing a president to threaten a NATO ally with force or economic punishment based on personal grievance places the United States on a path toward isolation, instability, and long-term loss of credibility. We therefore urge Congress to act immediately by: 1. Publicly repudiating any attempt to seize or coerce control over Greenland. 2. Passing legislation or a War Powers resolution prohibiting the use of U.S. forces against Denmark or Greenland without explicit congressional authorization. 3. Blocking funding for any military, intelligence, or economic action intended to pressure Denmark or Greenland. 4. Holding immediate oversight hearings on the President’s conduct, decision-making, and fitness with respect to foreign policy and national security. 5. Reaffirming U.S. commitments to NATO and the post–World War II rules-based international order. Silence now would constitute acquiescence. History shows that unchecked executive power in foreign affairs leads not to strength, but to catastrophe. Congress is the last constitutional guardrail. It must act.

Text SIGN PJNONG to 50409 to send this to your officials.

Text SIGN POMNSN to 50409 — President Donald J. Trump has escalated from inflammatory rhetoric to explicit threats against a NATO ally and its autonomous territory, Greenland. These threats now include economic coercion, alliance pressure, and refusal to rule out the use of force. Congress must intervene immediately. Multiple outlets, including Bloomberg, PBS NewsHour, the BBC, and The Atlantic, have confirmed the authenticity of a message distributed by the U.S. National Security Council to European governments, originally sent by President Trump to Norway’s prime minister. In that message, the President asserted that the United States must have “complete and total control of Greenland,” rejected Denmark’s sovereignty over the territory, and explicitly linked his foreign-policy posture to resentment over not receiving the Nobel Peace Prize. These claims are demonstrably false and profoundly dangerous. Greenland is a self-governing territory within the Kingdom of Denmark, a founding member of NATO. Danish sovereignty over Greenland is well established in international law and has been formally recognized by the United States for decades, including through bilateral defense agreements. The President has justified his threats by claiming Greenland must be seized to prevent Russian or Chinese aggression. This argument is fundamentally incoherent. Greenland is already protected by NATO. The entire purpose of the alliance is collective defense: any attack on Denmark or Greenland would trigger a unified response. By threatening a NATO ally, the President is not strengthening deterrence—he is destroying it. If the United States attacks or coerces its own allies, the alliance ceases to function, and the very risks the President claims to fear become more likely, not less. The President has also confirmed his intent to impose tariffs on allied nations and to use NATO obligations as leverage for territorial demands. European leaders and industry groups have warned that these actions risk a trade war and permanent damage to transatlantic security cooperation. Denmark has now begun reinforcing its military presence in Greenland in response to U.S. threats—an extraordinary and alarming development between allies. Congress cannot dismiss this as bluster. The Constitution assigns Congress authority over war, trade, and appropriations precisely to prevent reckless or personal decision-making from dragging the nation into conflict. Allowing a president to threaten a NATO ally with force or economic punishment based on personal grievance places the United States on a path toward isolation, instability, and long-term loss of credibility. We therefore urge Congress to act immediately by: 1. Publicly repudiating any attempt to seize or coerce control over Greenland. 2. Passing legislation or a War Powers resolution prohibiting the use of U.S. forces against Denmark or Greenland without explicit congressional authorization. 3. Blocking funding for any military, intelligence, or economic action intended to pressure Denmark or Greenland. 4. Holding immediate oversight hearings on the President’s conduct, decision-making, and fitness with respect to foreign policy and national security. 5. Reaffirming U.S. commitments to NATO and the post–World War II rules-based international order. Silence now would constitute acquiescence. History shows that unchecked executive power in foreign affairs leads not to strength, but to catastrophe. Congress is the last constitutional guardrail. It must act.

Text SIGN PQPGDI to 50409 — The President of the United States is once again threatening to deploy our troops against American citizens. Trump has publicly warned that he is considering invoking the Insurrection Act to stop protests against state violence in Minnesota. Unlike the ICE and CBP agents Trump has sent in, who have already killed a legal observer and brutalized their targets and protesters alike, the folks exercising their First Amendment rights have been overwhelmingly peaceful. These are people who believe in our Constitution, and simply want our government to be held to it, too. What Trump is threatening is the stuff of tinpot dictatorships. One of the crucial protections that has kept America free and democratic has been our insistence that the military never be used as a political weapon against our own. That safeguard is being destroyed. It’s an affront to our most sacred values, and it’s dangerous as hell. If the President chooses to pull the trigger, you need to treat it as the dire emergency for our nation that it is. Have a strategy ready and be prepared to use whatever legislative or political tools you have available to take concrete and meaningful action. Strongly-worded letters and angry videos on social media won’t cut it. If you accept this as business as usual, that’s what it will become.

Text SIGN PKQJIW to 50409 — I am writing to urge you to initiate impeachment proceedings against President Donald Trump, Vice President JD Vance, and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth for their roles in the unauthorized military strikes in Venezuela that resulted in the capture of President Nicolás Maduro. While I oppose Maduro's authoritarian regime, the weekend military operation in Caracas represents a clear violation of constitutional limits on executive power. The President does not have unilateral authority to conduct offensive military operations against a sovereign nation without congressional authorization. Trump's characterization of the strikes as "amazing" and "brilliant tactically" at the House GOP retreat demonstrates a cavalier attitude toward the constitutional requirement for congressional approval of military action. The operation has created a dangerous precedent for executive overreach. Trump has already announced plans to exploit Venezuelan oil resources, telling reporters "we got a lot of oil to drill" and teasing a meeting with oil executives. He has named Marco Rubio, Pete Hegseth, Stephen Miller, and JD Vance as the team overseeing US involvement in Venezuela, effectively establishing an occupation government without congressional input. Climate experts warn this could produce an additional 550 million tons of CO2 annually if Venezuelan oil production reaches 1.5 million barrels per day, equivalent to the annual emissions of the UK or Brazil. Trump's dismissal of Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado, who is widely believed to have won the 2024 election, in favor of working with interim president Delcy Rodríguez further demonstrates that this operation serves Trump's interests rather than democratic principles. His statement that there will be no Venezuelan election within 30 days because "we have to fix the country first" reveals imperial ambitions. I urge you to hold these officials accountable through impeachment proceedings. The Constitution requires congressional authorization for military action, and this administration has flagrantly violated that requirement.

Text SIGN PHREQU to 50409 to send this to your officials.

Text SIGN PHWMJX to 50409 — With near incredulity, I take pen in hand to urge you to oppose any funding for the proposed Trump-class battleship program announced by Trump. This program represents a strategic mistake that would waste billions of taxpayer dollars on obsolete technology while undermining our actual naval capabilities. Defense experts across the political spectrum have dismissed this proposal as fundamentally flawed and it’s obviously incapable of being built. The cost alone should disqualify this program. By estimates, a single battleship of any design for the size proposed, could cost upward of $8 billion, plus additional crew and maintenance expenses. In the real world of naval construction, The Navy's Zumwalt-class destroyers were reduced from 32 ships to just three due to spiraling costs, and the Constellation-class frigate was recently canceled entirely due to budget overruns. Our military needs modern capabilities, not wasteful prestige projects. Send the message: Reject this project and instead support investments in proven technologies that enhance our actual naval readiness. Thank you.