Thor Berger
thorberger.bsky.social
Thor Berger
@thorberger.bsky.social

Economic Historian. Pro Futura Scientia Fellow XVI at Swedish Collegium (Uppsala University), Associate Professor at Lund University, and Research Affiliate at the CEPR and IFN.

Economics 43%
Sociology 21%
That's like four economics awards in a row with a substantial economic-history component, right? That strikes me as a remarkable shift. www.nobelprize.org/prizes/lists...

Reposted by Thor Berger

NBER @nber.org · Feb 27
Examining the social construction of race during the US Reconstruction Era finds that people with the same skin tone were racialized based on their wealth, setting a path for racial stratification, from @aadukia.bsky.social, Hornbeck, Keniston, and Lualdi https://www.nber.org/papers/w33502

Awesome!
New working paper alert: "Financing Innovation: The Role of Patent Examination". @steve-bill-econ.bsky.social, Christopher Coyle and I have been working on this for quite a while now. We are excited to have a full draft for your enjoyment! www.quceh.org.uk/uploads/1/0/...
🚨 New Working Paper 🚨

w/ @pdavidboll.bsky.social and @jvoth.bsky.social

Do you run regressions on spatial data? Then keep reading!

We present a guide and Stata package for methods by Müller and Watson (2024 ECTA) to deal with Spatial Unit Roots in Regressions.

Link in 🧵 (1/n)

Thanks for the clarification @alexanderdonges.bsky.social!

I thought several German states had general incorporation laws already in the 1860s and that it became Reich law from 1871? I also think I recall talks about a "Gründerboom" in the early 1870s as a result of the legislative changes?

Why do firms in poor countries not adopt new technologies? One reason: they're too small. We show in a recent paper that the "invention" of the the modern corporate form historically enabled marginal firms to grow and adopt new technologies. Paper forthcoming in the JEH and @voxeu.org column here:
Institutional innovation and the adoption of new technologies
A key barrier to economic development is that while new technologies can offer substantial productivity gains, firms in poorer countries often do not adopt them. This column uses firm-level data to track the adoption of the key technology of the 19th century – the steam engine – during Sweden’s rapid industrial take-off. Much like in many developing countries today, Swedish firms were generally too small to profitably adopt the new technology. The authors document the central role of an institutional innovation – the modern corporation – and demonstrate that when firms were given the opportunity to incorporate, they expanded and adopted steam technology.
cepr.org

Reposted by Thor Berger

New Publication! 🎉 Congratulations to @erikprawitz.bsky.social and @thorberger.bsky.social for publishing their paper "Inventors among the 'Impoverished Sophisticate'" in the prestigious Journal of Economic History! 🤩
Inventors among the “Impoverished Sophisticate” | The Journal of Economic History | Cambridge Core
Inventors among the “Impoverished Sophisticate” - Volume 84 Issue 4
www.cambridge.org

Thanks for your interest, Alice - I'll send you a copy!

Maybe 19th-century technological change wasn't deskilling after all:

Reposted by Thor Berger

När klockan är 12 i Stockholm, hvad är den då på andra orter i Sverige? Nödvändig kunskap 1858 eller bara ett kuriosum? runeberg.org/svea/1858/02... Västra stambanan invigdes 1862. Enhetlig normaltid infördes 1879.

Reposted by Thor Berger

Today and tomorrow we will celebrate the life and work of the late Nick Crafts ❤️

Nick was a fantastic colleague, friend, and founding director of @cagewarwick.bsky.social

Today's Crafts Lecture will be given by the wonderful Leah Boustan.

Full program 👇

warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/econ...

Reposted by Thor Berger

Reposted by Thor Berger

Reposted by Thor Berger

Göran Greider har 660 följare (@gorangreider.bsky.social). Expressens kulturchef Victor Malm har dubbelt så många (@victormalm.bsky.social), men Projekt Runeberg (@runeberg-org.bsky.social) har ännu bara ett ensiffrigt antal. Hur ska vi ändra på det? Dela vidare!
I made a "starter pack" for economic and financial historians! Let me know if I need to add someone to the list!

go.bsky.app/FdNNFQD
For the people from Twitter following my advert for this place, here are the guideposts / ‘starter packs’:

Economic History Starter Packs (2)

bsky.app/starter-pack...

bsky.app/starter-pack...

Growth & Development Starter Pack

bsky.app/starter-pack...
Recently accepted by #QJE, “War Reparations, Structural Change, and Intergenerational Mobility,” by Matti Mitrunen: doi.org/10.1093/qje/...
War Reparations, Structural Change, and Intergenerational Mobility*
Abstract. From 1944 to 1952, largely agrarian Finland had to export, on average, 4% of its yearly GDP in industrial products to the Soviet Union as war rep
doi.org

Reposted by Thor Berger

Why do new technologies take so long to be adopted? This article from the Journal of Political Economy answers this question by analyzing the adoption of mechanized cotton spinning during the first French industrial revolution. Read it here: ow.ly/1AjG50TYrMw #EconSky

Finns det någon vettig data (utöver typ antalet hästar) på det för 1800-talet?

Reposted by Thor Berger

🎧 New VoxTalks Economics #Podcast
The economic effect of the Great Fire of London
Philipp Ager & Paul Sharp tell Tim Phillips about contemporary records they have uncovered, and what they reveal about #London’s #economy before and after the fire
cepr.org/multimedia/e...
📉📈 #EconSky

A graph style that should get more love is the Stevenson-Wolfers arrowplot:

Yep! But those debates largely took place in the JEH.

I guess one has to squint a bit to see it :-) What was even more interesting in the Abramitzky piece to me though was the U-shape over the past century:

I think it's safe to say that the public at large has no idea what EH is, even after WNF.