Maya Sen
banner
mayasen.bsky.social
Maya Sen
@mayasen.bsky.social

Professor, Harvard Kennedy School | Speaking in a personal capacity | https://msen.scholars.harvard.edu/

Economics 33%
Law 32%

Reposted by Dani Rodrik, Maya Sen

In Opinion | The first step toward building a good jobs agenda requires officials thinking about economic development “to get over their manufacturing fetishism,” Dani Rodrik writes.
Opinion | What Even Is a ‘Good’ Job?
It starts with abandoning the fetish over manufacturing.
nyti.ms

@stevevladeck.bsky.social has a piece on this

Eviscerating Congressional established agencies? No problem

Moving $40 billion from account A to account B? Whoa there, hold your horses

An administration that for months claimed unilateral & absolute authority to shutter entire executive agencies suddenly finds without any agency to move money from one internal pot of money to another

As always, spot on in your analysis, Joey

Reposted by Maya Sen

But basically this agreement reads to me like one where the administration recognizes they are losing and are desperate to sign any deal to notch a win.

Many of the most dangerous elements from the Columbia and Brown deals (and the proposed deals with Harvard and UCLA) are missing from this one.

Enduring 3-4 years in an inhospitable ideological climate is apparently a huge ask in exchange for decades of political power

Yeah when demand for highly talented conservatives > supply, then you get pretty unqualified people in key roles

There’s never been a better time to be a young well-educated conservative

demand for them across every area of expertise (legal, economic, scientific) vastly outstrips supply

Maybe cool it a bit with the victim mentality?

Reposted by Brendan Nyhan

Why would they give up?

Republicans control 28 state legislatures, both chambers of Congress, and the White House

They have a 6-3 supermajority on the Supreme Court and a R appointments outnumber D appointments to other fed courts

www.politico.com/news/2025/11...
Amy Coney Barrett and Brett Kavanaugh to conservative law students: Don’t give up
The Trump appointees’ remarks came at a Federalist Society event in Washington.
www.politico.com

Reposted by David Darmofal

Excellent & clear explainer on the oral arguments in the tariffs case

Supreme Court Seems Skeptical of Trump’s Tariffs www.nytimes.com/2025/11/06/p...
Supreme Court Seems Skeptical of Trump’s Tariffs
www.nytimes.com

Also if you're an economist who thinks this is all insane, you've got to be feeling pretty relieved following that oral argument

Shout out to Neal Katyal's repeated pleas to common sense in this morning's oral arguments, because really it does feel like gaslighting sometimes
Economists, thinking rationally: “There is clearly no national emergency. He’s obviously just making shit up.”

Lawyers, thinking like lawyers: “But the foreign policy exception to the major questions doctrine…”
a man in a blue shirt and tie is pointing at a bulletin board with a lot of papers on it .
ALT: a man in a blue shirt and tie is pointing at a bulletin board with a lot of papers on it .
media.tenor.com
Not every justice has yet spoken, but Roberts and Barrett have and they are clearly against Trump's tariffs. That's five votes.

And funny

Humor in a political candidate is completely underrated

He’s part of your brand now, guys

You can ignore this issue and let Fox News and Trump turn him into a bogeyman

Or you can take control the narrative and make him a communicator on economic populism and working class issues

My hot take is that Mamdani is a very effective communicator and campaigner

And he’s funny too

Democrats should not just learn from him, but they should use him strategically - send him to Fox News etc, & let him make his policy pitches

No more of this weird “let’s ignore him” nonsense
Mamdani’s victory is a rebuke to the failed strategies of the Democratic party | Moira Donegan
Mamdani’s victory is a rebuke to the failed strategies of the Democratic party | Moira Donegan
The Democratic party appears listless and unprincipled, unwilling to fight because they do not believe in anything. Zohran Mamdani is the opposite of this
www.theguardian.com

Loooool

“Alex, I’ll take ‘Supreme Court claims that have aged poorly’ for $200”

Wouldn’t be an issue if we had a working national legislature!

Reposted by Maya Sen

Setti Warren, the former mayor of Newton and first Black man elected to lead a city in Massachusetts, has died.
Setti Warren, former Newton mayor and leading political voice, dies at 55 - The Boston Globe
No cause of death was disclosed Sunday by Harvard University, where Warren was the director of the Kennedy School's Institute of Politics.
trib.al

Basically all everyone is doing now is using whatever models you have (legal, partisan, ideological, personal) to guess the four swings - JR, ACB, and maybe NG and BK - depending on the issue and to see if you can pick off 2

Yeah there’s a well trodden foreign policy deference to the govt and upholding Trump’s ability on tarrifs would fit with that, and Kavanaugh has basically telegraphed this

So you’d need 2 of ACB, NG, and JR

law is endogenous to politics obvs, but this isn’t clear cut predictively

I think lawyers see this case as less clear cut than do others

The joke will be on the economists, though, as the only math needed here will be the ability to count to 5

Lmao 100%

They look at me like I’m crazy when I predict 5-4 in favor of upholding

Economists, thinking rationally: “There is clearly no national emergency. He’s obviously just making shit up.”

Lawyers, thinking like lawyers: “But the foreign policy exception to the major questions doctrine…”
a man in a blue shirt and tie is pointing at a bulletin board with a lot of papers on it .
ALT: a man in a blue shirt and tie is pointing at a bulletin board with a lot of papers on it .
media.tenor.com

As a purely anecdotal matter, most economists I’ve talked to think SCOTUS will limit POTUS’s ability to unilaterally impose tariffs - b/c they’re simply not an emergency

Disconnect between economists and lawyers on this prediction is significant

www.nytimes.com/2025/11/03/u...
Supreme Court Confronts Trump and His Tariffs in Test of Presidential Power
www.nytimes.com