Geert is a practising lawyer and full professor at KU Leuven, and a visiting prof i.a. at Monash University, Melbourne. Mostly law. Just law. Blogs at www.gavclaw.com
Geert Van Calster is a Belgian lawyer and legal scholar, focusing on conflict of laws, international trade law, EU and international environmental law, EU economic law, and investment and commercial arbitration. He is full professor of Law at KU Leuven, was the head of its department of European and International Law for 11 years between 2009 and 2020, and is a senior fellow at KU Leuven's Centre for Global Governance Studies. He is a former director of the Centre for Advanced Legal Studies at KU Leuven and former program director for the Master of Energy and Environmental Law (2002-2012). He is also a visiting professor at Monash University (Melbourne), at King's College London, and a senior fellow at Melbourne University School of Law. He is adjunct professor at American University, a former visiting lecturer at the University of Oxford and a former visiting professor at the China-EU School of Law in Beijing and Erasmus University, Rotterdam. Between 1994 and 2015, he was affiliated as of counsel (practising) with international law firms, respectively SJ Berwin; Andersen Legal; Dibb, Lupton, Alsop; and DLA Piper. He now runs his own, independent legal practice. He was called to the bar in 1999. He hosts a blog posting mostly on international dispute resolution at www.gavclaw.com. .. more
Wrongful removal of cryptocurrencies held by Claimants
Whether UTXO or LIFO method
Smithers ea v Persons Unknown [2026] EWHC 207 (Comm)
www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWH...
Good arguable case threshold incl discussion on applicable law (assimilated) Rome I
Whether express choice of law result of framework agreement; implied choice of law; cascade of A4
Westbase v Vuzix [2026] EWHC 138 (Ch) www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWH...
Attempt fails: court holds case is not 'international' despite suggested ex-Dutch elements
Overijssel deeplink.rechtspraak.nl/uitspraak?id...
Defendant's fraud (with discussion of whether this was, as it should, also argued in NY), ordre public arguments fail
BG Atlantic v Hay Hill Investments [2026] EWHC 226 (KB)
www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWH...
Opinion Rantos AG in [Idziski]: A justifiable continued reigning in of Article 7(2) Brussels Ia jurisdiction: suggests eDate centre of interest approach must not apply to terrestrial broadcasting.
gavclaw.com/2026/02/06/o...
We have asked @ec.europa.eu and the SMEs Executive Agency (EISMEA):
- if they set rules on the use of AI by evaluators
- if evaluators are required to disclose AI use
Reposted by Steve Peers, Geert Van Calster, Emmanuel Mourlon‐Druol
We have asked @ec.europa.eu and the SMEs Executive Agency (EISMEA):
- if they set rules on the use of AI by evaluators
- if evaluators are required to disclose AI use
A7(2) Brussels Ia: jurisdiction for courts of MS of broadcast of TV series with allegedly libelous content
Builds on Bolagsupplysningen etc: determination of COMI and so on
infocuria.curia.europa.eu/tabs/documen...
CJEU OKs EU GMO regime with wide remit for ban on GMO cultivation in MSs
Sidebar on whether case was engineered and inadmissible
C‑364/24 C‑393/24 Fidenato v Italy infocuria.curia.europa.eu/tabs/documen...
Whether priority went to later arbitration agreement, reading EN jurisdiction clause as giving supervisory jurisdiction over NY arbitration
Tyson v GIC [2026] EWCA Civ 40
bailii.org/ew/cases/EWC...
Dicey Rule 193: lex incorporationis capacity to represent
s145 Arbitration Act question of law
Sprinkling of English ordre public applies, too.
India v CC Devas (Mauritius) Ltd (In Administration) & Ors [2026] EWHC 156 (Comm)
www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWH...
gavclaw.com/2026/01/30/s...