#houseoversight011398
LightNews LightNews
epsteinweb.bsky.social
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011398.jpg
#epsteinweb #houseoversight011398
95 H3vlgiu2 1 its entirety. Accordingly it should be summarily denied as 2 moot. 3 This motion should also be denied because it advances 4 the exact same arguments defendant advanced in her summary 5 judgment motion. She is seeking rehearing on her summary 6 judgment motion, dressed up as a motion in limine. Many courts 7 in this district have summarily denied motions in limine that 8 seek to relitigate arguments from summary judgment, and I have 9 listed six such cases on pages 7 and 8 of our response in 10 opposition. You ordered nine defendant's motions for summary ide judgment. This Court rejects the argument that she should have 12 partial summary judgment on the January 4th statement. The 13 last sentence of that order states, "Because of the existence 14 of triable issues of material fact rather than opinion and 5 because the prelitigation privilege is inapplicable, the motion 16 for summary judgment is denied." Defendant's reiteration of a her defamatory press release confirming it two days later is 18 something that this Court did not rule that that is not 18 actionable. So she's seeking rehearing. 20 Also importantly, your Honor, Ms. Giuffre opposed Pal summary judgment on defendant's defamation in its entirety. 22 She opposed the motion for summary judgment in its entirety, 23 and this statement, as part and parcel of defendant's 24 defamation and part and parcel of defendant's motion for 25 summary judgment. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011398
February 7, 2026 at 1:15 AM