#houseoversight011392
LightNews LightNews
epsteinweb.bsky.social
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011392.jpg
#epsteinweb #houseoversight011392
89 H3VOGIU1 1 name of it, but it was the plaintiff's motion, sort of omnibus 2 related to different acts either under 404(b) or 415. a The plaintiff wanted until 15 days before trial to 4 make whatever showing they wanted. It would make sense -- 5 well, in defendant's 404(b) motion, there are some of those 6 issues, as well. We certainly could argue part of that. The 7 Court may want to defer that to the entirety of when we have 8 whatever the supplement is to that motion yesterday. 9 Then we also, I believe, dealt with yesterday the 10 issue related to the Jane Doe 102 complaint. We have a ide competing motion on that. That's 663. It seems to me that was 12 argued yesterday, and we don't need to repeat those arguments, 13 which is the same argument we had yesterday. 14 So in my view, your Honor, that leaves the bifurcated 15 trial motion, which has been fully briefed, the Kellen and 16 Marcinkova issue, and the police report issue. So by my count, a we have those three. 18 I also have on my calendar that our motion to 18 preclude -- or the plaintiff's motion to preclude calling 20 attorneys as witnesses, which is 685 and 772, and by my Pal calendaring the reply was due yesterday. I think Ms. McCawley 22 has a different version of that, and so frankly, I don't care 23 whether we hear that today or some other time. 24 So that's my accounting of what we have ripe for 29 argument today, or shouldn't have argument today, as the case SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011392
February 7, 2026 at 1:13 AM