#houseoversight011390
LightNews LightNews
epsteinweb.bsky.social
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011390.jpg
#epsteinweb #houseoversight011390
87 H3VOGIU1 1 extremely patient. Let me just take two more minutes to cover 2 point 19. This is Judge Marra's ruling. a They say we want to put it in that she lost. Well, in 4 our view, actually, that was a victory. Our goal was to try to 5 get her into the case, and Judge Marra ruled that she could 6 participate by being a witness. 7 Now, are we really going to try the implications of 8 Judge Marra's ruling in a pro bono Crime Victims Rights Act 9 organization ruling? He ruled on this, but allowed this other 10 thing. It's highly, first, irrelevant, and obviously, highly ide prejudicial in the sense that it's going to divert the jury's 12 attention away from the facts at hand here. 13 And again, Judge Marra only ruled on the first of nine 14 reasons that we offered for putting those allegations in. He LS said point 1 doesn't work, the others we'll see how things play 16 out. a The litigation is moving forward. I can tell you the 18 government will be responding to our summary judgment motion, I 18 believe on May 15th. We'll be replying on July 15th, so the 20 litigation continues. Pal The last point that I'll make is Boylan. This is item 22 20. Remember, Dershowitz is going to say that Boylan says that 23 Ms. Giuffre said certain things. And we were told that, well, 24 maybe she will be a witness. 25 It's my understanding that Boylan is not on the final SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011390
February 7, 2026 at 1:13 AM