#houseoversight010793
LightNews LightNews
epsteinweb.bsky.social
Part 2/3 — HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010793.jpg
#epsteinweb #houseoversight010793
pleading, it doesn't pass even 22 same Don Lemon CNN interview what possible motive 22 the minimal giggle test. And I'm embarrassed for 23 the attorneys, Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell, could 23 Professor Cassell that he would have signed his name 24 have had to have identified you in the pleading that 24 toa pleading that alleges that Prince Andrew would 25 was filed in the Crime Victim's Rights Act case, 25 pressure the United States attorney for the Southern 218 220 z Do you remember that? 1 District of Florida into giving Jeffrey Epstein a 2 A. That's right, yes. 2 good deal. 3 Q. And your response was, quote — 3 MR. SCAROLA: Move to strike the 4 MR. SCOTT: Here's your transcript if you 4 unresponsive portions of the answer. And 5 need to refer to it. 5 obviously the break didn’t do any good. 6 BY MR. SCAROLA: 6 MR. SCOTT: Let's proceed. 7 Q. —"They want to be able to challenge the t MR. SCAROLA: We're going to. 8 plea agreement and I was one of the lawyers who 8 BY MR. SCAROLA: 9 organized the plea agreement. I got the very good 9 Q. You stated, quote: "If they," referring 10 deal for Jeffrey Epstein." 10 to Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell, "could find a a1 Did you make that response? 11 lawyer who helped draft the agreement" — 12 A. Yes. 12 A. Right. 13 Q. So, you recognized as of January 5, 2015, is Q. ~"who also was a criminal having sex, 14 that the reason why the statements were filed in the 14 wow, that could help them blow up the agreement." as Crime Victim's Rights Act case was because the Crime 15 Did you make that statement on -~ 16 Victim's Rights Act case had, as an objective, 16 A. Yes. 1 just repeated it now, yes, under 17 setting aside the plea agreement that you had 17 oath, yes. 18 negotiated for Jeffrey Epstein, correct? 18 Q. Did you state the following in that same 19 MR. SCOTT: Objection, form. Go ahead if 19 interview: "So they," referring to Bradley Edwards, 20 you can answer it. 20 Paul Cassell and Virginia Roberts, "sat down bee A.
February 6, 2026 at 11:37 AM
epsteinweb.bsky.social
Part 1/3 — HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010793.jpg
#epsteinweb #houseoversight010793
217 219 1 demonstrably false, but you could have easily 1 she has a history of lying, knowing that she is 2 discovered that the implication you were drawing was 2 easily suggestible, and they basically pressured 3 demonstrably false by simply taking one second and 3 her, according to my sources, into including me when 4 —— Googling her name as my wife did. 4 she didn't want to include me, because by including 5 BY MR. SCAROLA: s mie, they could make a claim, false as it was, could 6 Q. And so at 25 years old, she wasn't a young 6 make a false claim that a person who negotiated the o woman? 4 NPA was also criminally involved with her. 8 A. She was not the kind of woman that I was 8 They also lied -- lied unethically and 9 describing as underage. She was a mature, serious, 9 unprofessionally by saying that I negotiated that 10 I think I said in my public statements a model. 1 10 provision of the NPA, which gave me, myself, any 11 wasn't aware at the time that see was working for 11 kind of immunity from prosecution had I had improper 12 Victoria's Secrets, but Google demonstrates that. 12 sex with Virginia Roberts, which, of course, I did 13 And I described her exactly, in exactly the right 13 not. And that was one of the bases on which I was 14 terms, a serious person. 14 certain that they had engaged in unprofessional, 28 Talways saw her dressed when I saw her -- 15 disbarrable and unethical conduct by including that 16 I saw her maybe on two or three occasions, dressed 16 provision, as well as including a provision that 17 appropriately. She was a serious adult worker and I 17 Prince Andrew was included because he, Prince 18 think you insult and demean her when you suggest 18 Andrew, pressured a United States attomey to try to 19 that anything other than that she was a serious 19 get a good deal for Jeffrey Epstein. 20 adult when she flew on that airplane. 20 That is so laughable. How any lawyer 22 Q. You were asked on the occasion of that 21 could put that in a
February 6, 2026 at 11:37 AM
epsteinweb.bsky.social
Part 3/3 — HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010793.jpg
#epsteinweb #houseoversight010793
There were multiple motives. One of the 25 together, the three of them, these two sleazy, 22 motives was crassly financial. They were trying to 22 unprofessional disbarrable lawyers" -- 23 line their pockets with money. But as I also said, 23 A. Uh-huh, uh-huh. 24 and I said this over and over again, they profiled 24 Q. -- "they said" -- 25 me. They sat down with their client, knowing that 25 MR. SCOTT: Let him ask the question. 11 (Pages 217 to 220) www. phippsreporting.com (888) 811-3408 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010793
February 6, 2026 at 11:38 AM