#Radfem
Yeah. Like wanting a form of masculinity in sepf or others as tainted or poisonous. I think reflection on why is important which is where u agree with radfem tjought - you should do some navel gazing just with everything tbh. But I don’t think liking men or bwing a guy or guy aligned is evil
November 16, 2025 at 5:51 PM
Politics but I find radfem/lesbian ‘magically the most marginalised’ stuff annoying as someone who was sexually and psychologically abused as a minor by a lesbian. And has had friends exposed to this type of abuse. im open to learning but I have found nothing that demystifies abusive lesbianism.
November 16, 2025 at 5:00 PM
fair but also consider - forensics and overall investigation are much harder in those cases!
You can't, contra some radfem demands, just assume one partner is telling the truth. It is a genuinely complicated procedural matter!
The reason that modern societies have so much trouble dealing with "private" forms of abuse is that the idea that you, as an individual, have a right to state protection against your spouse or father or family or community is relatively new, and depends on an impersonal system of justice.
November 16, 2025 at 8:50 AM
I checked the citation and saw it was a 1970s radfem book, so I was expecting worse but it does seem like an attempt at a romeo and juliet law. The paraphrasing in Instead of Prisons is either insane or insidious, not sure which.
November 16, 2025 at 6:32 AM
eu interagi com conteúdo do corrida das blogueiras UMA vez e agora meu cuiter tá cheio de radfem vai se fode
November 15, 2025 at 7:28 PM
Tip for using AI in research (if you are adopting it).

With Gemini, instruct it to use Google Scholar sources only. Or, direct it to parts of the internet, databases, etc, where the good info on your topic lies.

Unless it's feminism, get connected to RadFem Archive.
@radfem | Linktree
Linktree. Make your link do more.
linktr.ee
November 15, 2025 at 3:02 PM
Tip for using AI in research (if you are adopting it).

With Gemini, instruct it to use Google Scholar sources only. Or, direct it to parts of the internet, databases, etc, where the good info on your topic lies.

Unless it's feminism, get connected to RadFem Archive.
@radfem | Linktree
Linktree. Make your link do more.
linktr.ee
November 15, 2025 at 2:37 PM
Essa afirmação é justamente o contrario de reduzir mulher a um útero, mas eu entendo q radfem e coerência na mesma frase não se encaixam
me derrete um neurônio toda vez que penso que as pessoas não entendem que "pessoas com útero" não é reduzir uma mulher a um útero porque NEM TODA mulher tem útero e nem todo mundo com útero É MULHER
November 15, 2025 at 2:35 PM
_welcome to one of the most notorious fascist cesspools on the internet. our directory of Black, brown, and trans radfem theory can be found right there beside the section dedicated to bullying trans women off the internet_
November 15, 2025 at 9:40 AM
quem é esse estrume? fico mto preocupade em como essas pseudociencias das radfem tem se disseminado cada vez mais entre lgbts
November 15, 2025 at 12:34 AM
I also have a wider issue with "top" being used to mean either penetrating or domming or both, but explaining it would necessitate the phrase "cishet patriarchal expectations" and I'm not in the mood to have people call me a radfem today over that
November 14, 2025 at 11:13 PM
#RadFem #CC0
用免費素材拼了個激女LOGO 可商用 媎妹們隨意
(♀️據說起源是維納斯的鏡子😅大家斟酌一下,看是要以傳播度為主還是再做新的視覺)
November 14, 2025 at 6:07 PM
The downfall of sinfest should be studied because how did a pro-sex/kink webcomic from the 2000s turn into a radfem/terf comic in the 2010s to an altright nuthouse in the 2020s
November 14, 2025 at 5:19 PM
Im not a radfem so, I guess, but I would welcome some introspection on the matter from queer/gay men.
November 14, 2025 at 1:05 PM
Feminazi (radfem) parte do princípio de que é válido questionar a existência de pessoas trans tal qual uma teoria, como se a pessoa não existisse MATERIALMENTE.

Se as pessoas trans são o novo espantalho da extrema-direita, essas minas são as cavaleiras do neofascismo.
November 13, 2025 at 10:34 PM
Pessoal fala de analfabetismo funcional, mas pior q isso é a pessoa NEM LER y já formar opinião comentando. Y isso n é exclusividade de bolsonarista y afins viu? Qdo a Boitempo lançou o livro do Mieli, as radfem vieram em peso cagar sem ter lido (o mesmo com Quem tem medo do Gênero da Butler rs)
November 13, 2025 at 10:24 PM
they published a few other radfem books after hers. they thought it was the very progressive thing to do at the time. kinda stopped around the nineties and they've just never spoke about it since.
November 13, 2025 at 6:32 PM
Some transfeminists from the Author cluster have taken the radfem larp too seriously and are now circling back to "always believe accusations against transfems[1] based on flimsy evidence[2]"

[1] even though the recent drama started with a cis man
[2] sharing a blog post
November 13, 2025 at 2:49 PM
The flaws (imo) I could pick out are the way it tries to read itself as a sorta feminist-leaning book, confining men to this specific sort of evil or socialization that they could Not redeem themselves from, because ngl it borders on being a bit too radfem but idk
November 13, 2025 at 12:14 PM