November 10, 2025 at 12:27 PM
boolean logic & search query operators has been hard depreciated for 10+ years. despite some 'official' sources stating otherwise. even in advanced search
November 11, 2025 at 5:38 AM
boolean logic & search query operators has been hard depreciated for 10+ years. despite some 'official' sources stating otherwise. even in advanced search
These days I feel like Google's search just completely ignores boolean operators & just displays whatever the fuck it wants. Specifically when trying to exclude terms from search results.
November 11, 2025 at 12:02 AM
These days I feel like Google's search just completely ignores boolean operators & just displays whatever the fuck it wants. Specifically when trying to exclude terms from search results.
In this video we have a quick look at solving a boolean hole for subdivision ready topology.
#Blender #B3D #Blender3D
#Blender #B3D #Blender3D
November 7, 2025 at 4:50 PM
In this video we have a quick look at solving a boolean hole for subdivision ready topology.
#Blender #B3D #Blender3D
#Blender #B3D #Blender3D
Gonna help you out; pass it on. When you're looking at results,
Search Tools > switch "All Results" to "Verbatim"
I've never bothered to test if it covers ALL boolean logic, but this does revert operation to a much more accurate keyword search, like you'd expect. ✌🏼
Search Tools > switch "All Results" to "Verbatim"
I've never bothered to test if it covers ALL boolean logic, but this does revert operation to a much more accurate keyword search, like you'd expect. ✌🏼
November 11, 2025 at 5:00 AM
Gonna help you out; pass it on. When you're looking at results,
Search Tools > switch "All Results" to "Verbatim"
I've never bothered to test if it covers ALL boolean logic, but this does revert operation to a much more accurate keyword search, like you'd expect. ✌🏼
Search Tools > switch "All Results" to "Verbatim"
I've never bothered to test if it covers ALL boolean logic, but this does revert operation to a much more accurate keyword search, like you'd expect. ✌🏼
🐍 Python Term of the Day: False (Python Keywords)
A built-in constant that represents the Boolean value for false.
realpython.com/ref/keywords...
A built-in constant that represents the Boolean value for false.
realpython.com/ref/keywords...
False | Python Keywords – Real Python
A built-in constant that represents the Boolean value for false.
realpython.com
November 8, 2025 at 3:41 PM
🐍 Python Term of the Day: False (Python Keywords)
A built-in constant that represents the Boolean value for false.
realpython.com/ref/keywords...
A built-in constant that represents the Boolean value for false.
realpython.com/ref/keywords...
This is a little easier to parse than most legal headlines but I appreciate the explanation anyway. I don't like doing Boolean Algebra to figure out whether or not we still have healthcare
November 8, 2025 at 11:43 PM
This is a little easier to parse than most legal headlines but I appreciate the explanation anyway. I don't like doing Boolean Algebra to figure out whether or not we still have healthcare
👀 React Suspense for CPU-intensive tasks
We've heard about it a long time ago, and the API has recently been refined as a simple "defer" boolean prop.
🚧 Not ready for prime time, but it should be in the next experimental channel release
github.com/facebook/rea...
We've heard about it a long time ago, and the API has recently been refined as a simple "defer" boolean prop.
🚧 Not ready for prime time, but it should be in the next experimental channel release
github.com/facebook/rea...
November 7, 2025 at 9:27 AM
👀 React Suspense for CPU-intensive tasks
We've heard about it a long time ago, and the API has recently been refined as a simple "defer" boolean prop.
🚧 Not ready for prime time, but it should be in the next experimental channel release
github.com/facebook/rea...
We've heard about it a long time ago, and the API has recently been refined as a simple "defer" boolean prop.
🚧 Not ready for prime time, but it should be in the next experimental channel release
github.com/facebook/rea...
AI or smart search engines are demonstrably worse because they suck at parsing terms and don't use Boolean operations. Having to reword a search term 16 times is worse, not better.
November 12, 2025 at 4:13 AM
AI or smart search engines are demonstrably worse because they suck at parsing terms and don't use Boolean operations. Having to reword a search term 16 times is worse, not better.
Basically, each parameter can have a basic "type" corresponding to a specific user interface input (boolean, range, option).
This means I can list everything in one place and not have to worry about input errors when retrieving or defining values :)
(Nothing revolutionary, but it works for me :) )
This means I can list everything in one place and not have to worry about input errors when retrieving or defining values :)
(Nothing revolutionary, but it works for me :) )
November 7, 2025 at 1:50 PM
Basically, each parameter can have a basic "type" corresponding to a specific user interface input (boolean, range, option).
This means I can list everything in one place and not have to worry about input errors when retrieving or defining values :)
(Nothing revolutionary, but it works for me :) )
This means I can list everything in one place and not have to worry about input errors when retrieving or defining values :)
(Nothing revolutionary, but it works for me :) )
wait... wait... but do you have *3* boolean states, like Typescript?
November 6, 2025 at 11:12 PM
wait... wait... but do you have *3* boolean states, like Typescript?
Still trying to leak sensitive data?!
Instead of a 'safelist' for WHAT TO INCLUDE, you need a 'blocklist' for what to exclude!
Meet Omit. It's the perfect utility type for when you want to return ALMOST everything from an object, but need to guarantee you hide sensitive fields:
Instead of a 'safelist' for WHAT TO INCLUDE, you need a 'blocklist' for what to exclude!
Meet Omit. It's the perfect utility type for when you want to return ALMOST everything from an object, but need to guarantee you hide sensitive fields:
November 12, 2025 at 5:15 PM
Still trying to leak sensitive data?!
Instead of a 'safelist' for WHAT TO INCLUDE, you need a 'blocklist' for what to exclude!
Meet Omit. It's the perfect utility type for when you want to return ALMOST everything from an object, but need to guarantee you hide sensitive fields:
Instead of a 'safelist' for WHAT TO INCLUDE, you need a 'blocklist' for what to exclude!
Meet Omit. It's the perfect utility type for when you want to return ALMOST everything from an object, but need to guarantee you hide sensitive fields:
Post the link to the meta study or at the very minimum the title and the authors and which journal article we can find it at, if you dont have the link. We can do a Boolean search, if needed. If you know what the actual fuck that is lmao
November 6, 2025 at 11:53 PM
Post the link to the meta study or at the very minimum the title and the authors and which journal article we can find it at, if you dont have the link. We can do a Boolean search, if needed. If you know what the actual fuck that is lmao
I found a problem: `toBoolean` returns the inverted original value, but it should return it in the boolean type.
November 7, 2025 at 4:08 PM
I found a problem: `toBoolean` returns the inverted original value, but it should return it in the boolean type.
Are you kidding? Now I’ve got my own hat on! The number of programmers who don’t understand the +UX of a boolean AND (or the impact of a poorly-placed OR 😩) never fails to mystify me. I can’t shop online effectively at two major retailers because I swim in search results if I use even two words. 🤦🏼♂️😂
November 10, 2025 at 7:03 PM
Are you kidding? Now I’ve got my own hat on! The number of programmers who don’t understand the +UX of a boolean AND (or the impact of a poorly-placed OR 😩) never fails to mystify me. I can’t shop online effectively at two major retailers because I swim in search results if I use even two words. 🤦🏼♂️😂
Ich such ein Tool, besser gesagt einen Weg, mit dem ich Suchbegriffen, auch mit Boolean Operators ggf, schnell (zusammengefasst) suchen kann in diversen journalistischen Onlinemedien. Etwas was ist wie ein APA Service aber doch nicht. Ich kenn das Observer Tool. Aber hat wer andere Tools/ Prozesse?
November 6, 2025 at 5:56 PM
Ich such ein Tool, besser gesagt einen Weg, mit dem ich Suchbegriffen, auch mit Boolean Operators ggf, schnell (zusammengefasst) suchen kann in diversen journalistischen Onlinemedien. Etwas was ist wie ein APA Service aber doch nicht. Ich kenn das Observer Tool. Aber hat wer andere Tools/ Prozesse?
With everything that happened lately I forgot to post the comparison as I promised.
The 'broken' left shoulder-brush on the 2023 model is due to the boolean differences I did back then so the mirror would fit there once printed.
I like to think I've improved at least a little in 2.5 years😅
The 'broken' left shoulder-brush on the 2023 model is due to the boolean differences I did back then so the mirror would fit there once printed.
I like to think I've improved at least a little in 2.5 years😅
November 6, 2025 at 4:57 PM
With everything that happened lately I forgot to post the comparison as I promised.
The 'broken' left shoulder-brush on the 2023 model is due to the boolean differences I did back then so the mirror would fit there once printed.
I like to think I've improved at least a little in 2.5 years😅
The 'broken' left shoulder-brush on the 2023 model is due to the boolean differences I did back then so the mirror would fit there once printed.
I like to think I've improved at least a little in 2.5 years😅
simplifying my boolean expressions for no not november
November 1, 2025 at 9:47 PM
simplifying my boolean expressions for no not november
The string of - I have to add at the end of my Google searches is ridiculous.
-ai, -tiktok, -facebook
It’s like a boolean spell every time.
-ai, -tiktok, -facebook
It’s like a boolean spell every time.
November 6, 2025 at 6:46 PM
The string of - I have to add at the end of my Google searches is ridiculous.
-ai, -tiktok, -facebook
It’s like a boolean spell every time.
-ai, -tiktok, -facebook
It’s like a boolean spell every time.
Love when baseball announcers get bored enough to spout random facts. “This is just like when Washington Boolean hit a two run double into a swamp in 1918.”
November 2, 2025 at 3:28 AM
Love when baseball announcers get bored enough to spout random facts. “This is just like when Washington Boolean hit a two run double into a swamp in 1918.”
Laws of thought: George Boole, influential mathematician, born #OTD 1815; Boolean logic laid foundation for computers & Information Age.
University College Cork
University College Cork
November 2, 2025 at 6:00 AM
Laws of thought: George Boole, influential mathematician, born #OTD 1815; Boolean logic laid foundation for computers & Information Age.
University College Cork
University College Cork
Halloween logical operators, putting the 'Boo!' in 'boolean'.
November 1, 2025 at 2:03 AM
Halloween logical operators, putting the 'Boo!' in 'boolean'.
building a resumé with Typst is so nice
I can use boolean flags (loaded from a TOML file!) to conditionally adapt or hide sections
incredibly convenient :D
I can use boolean flags (loaded from a TOML file!) to conditionally adapt or hide sections
incredibly convenient :D
November 5, 2025 at 1:48 AM
building a resumé with Typst is so nice
I can use boolean flags (loaded from a TOML file!) to conditionally adapt or hide sections
incredibly convenient :D
I can use boolean flags (loaded from a TOML file!) to conditionally adapt or hide sections
incredibly convenient :D