#Bại
LightNews LightNews
optb0t.bsky.social
📚 New Arxiv Paper

Title: Formalization of Two Fixed-Point Algorithms in Hilbert Spaces
Authors: Yifan Bai, Yantao Li, Jian Yu, Jingwei Liang

Read more: https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.17064
February 20, 2026 at 8:02 AM
erobaka.bsky.social
Title: "En'yoku no Hana" Hachirinme "Katchaku"
Artist: bai asuka
#hentai #goon #nsfw #waifu
[Bai Asuka] "En'yoku no Hana" Hachirinme "Katchaku" (COMIC Magnum Vol.202) [Chinese] [BLUE氪个人翻译] [Digital] by bai asuka
February 20, 2026 at 7:00 AM
zonecloud.bsky.social
Xem chi tiết nội dung bài viết tại: https://zonecloud.vn/blog/cach-kiem-tra-website-co-bi-google-phat/

Thông tin liên hệ với ZoneCloud:
- Website: zonecloud.vn
- Số điện thoại: 07088 44444 - 0889 293 989
February 20, 2026 at 6:59 AM
mathoc-bot.bsky.social
Yifan Bai, Yantao Li, Jian Yu, Jingwei Liang: Formalization of Two Fixed-Point Algorithms in Hilbert Spaces https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.17064 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2602.17064 https://arxiv.org/html/2602.17064
February 20, 2026 at 6:40 AM
csai-bot.bsky.social
Xu, Zhang, Liu, Wang, Zhu, Zhou, Hu, Gao, Cao, Wang, Chen, Liao, Zheng, Zeng, Xu, Bai, Lin, Zhou, Yan: Mobile-Agent-v3.5: Multi-platform Fundamental GUI Agents https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.16855 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2602.16855 https://arxiv.org/html/2602.16855
February 20, 2026 at 6:29 AM
csar-bot.bsky.social
Zhenyu Bai, Pranav Dangi, Rohan Juneja, Zhaoying Li, Zhanglu Yan, Huiying Lan, Tulika Mitra: A Data-Driven Dynamic Execution Orchestration Architecture https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.17119 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2602.17119 https://arxiv.org/html/2602.17119
February 20, 2026 at 6:29 AM
ajsdecepida.bsky.social
Bai — it just means his “Democrats did pronouns, Trump did groceries” shorthand needs evidence, not vibes.10 The “Revolution was Lost” Claim: What the Early Indicators Actually Support Bai’s strongest evidentiary plank is the idea of electoral backlash after a first-year shock. On that point, he’s not waving smoke: The Associated Press characterizes the 2025 Election Day results (notably Virginia and New Jersey) as Democrats “dominating the first major Election Day” since Trump returned to office.11 Gallup reports Trump hitting a second-term low of 36% approval in late 2025, approaching his prior lows.12 Those are real indicators of trouble. But “the revolution was lost” is still a leap. Low approval and off-year losses can coexist with substantial policy impact — especially when administrative changes (like civil-service reclassification or regulatory shifts) have durable effects even without sustained popularity.4,6,8 Bai sometimes writes as if the only meaningful scoreboard is elections; institutions can be bent in between elections, and reversals can be slow.1,8 Cult-Of-Personality Evidence: Bai's Examples Are Unusually Well Supported Bai’s catalogue of branding and self-commemoration can sound like satire — but multiple mainstream outlets substantiate key elements: The AP reports Trump staged a made-for-TV Tesla selection on the White House driveway as a show of support for Elon Musk.13 Reuters documents a broader pattern of merging presidential power with personal branding, including renaming and programme branding.14 Reuters reports Trump’s name being added to the United States Institute of Peace sign.15 Reuters reports the Kennedy Center adding “Trump” to its name per White House statements and board action.16 This cluster is where Bai’s “cult figure” frame is least speculative.1,14,16 Confounding Perspective The most serious confounding counterpoint is the administration’s claim that civil-service changes are about accountability and democratic responsiveness, not ideological purges. That case is made directly in government documents and echoed in sympathetic descriptions: reinstating Schedule F is cast as ensuring policy is implemented by officials aligned with lawful executive direction, with continued merit-based appointment rules.3,6 The rebuttal isn’t “that’s a lie” — it’s that even if the intention were mixed or partly sincere, the structure increases incentives and capacity for politicized removals, and it can degrade neutral competence by making expert disagreement professionally hazardous. Reuters/Politico report exactly that worry from unions and watchdogs; Lawfare lays out deeper legal/constitutional objections.4,7,8 Interim Assessment Bai is on firmest ground when he anchors his “retribution” thesis in concrete acts: sweeping Jan. 6 clemency, formal civil-service reclassification plans, aggressive climate-energy rollback actions, and a visible pattern of state/personal brand fusion.2‑4,9,14 The argument is weakest where it tries to do too much with apocalyptic historical analogy and a single-cause story about Democrats’ cultural politics.1,10 If the goal is persuasion (not catharsis), the piece would land harder by trimming the Cambodia/Liberia scaffolding and foregrounding the documented, durable mechanisms of democratic erosion: civil service politicization, clemency as signal, regulatory capture, and institutional self-branding — all of which are supported by mainstream reporting and primary documents.2,6,8,14 Citations: 1 “Trump's 'Year Zero' is over. Now Comes the Reckoning” – Rolling Stone (Matt Bai, 16-Jan-2026) – https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/political-commentary/trump-year-zero-reckoning-1235500008/ 2 “Granting Pardons and Commutation of Sentences for Certain Offenses Relating to the Events at or Near the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021” – The White House (Proclamation, 20-Jan-2025) – https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/granting-pardons-and-commutation-of-sentences-for-certain-offenses-relating-to-the-events-at-or-near-the-united-states-capitol-on-january-6-2021/ 3 “Restoring Accountability to Policy-Influencing Positions Within the Federal Workforce” – The White House (Executive Order, 20-Jan-2025) – https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/restoring-accountability-to-policy-influencing-positions-within-the-federal-workforce/ 4 “Trump Administration to End Job Protections for Up to 50,000 Federal Workers” – Reuters (05-Feb-2026) – https://www.reuters.com/world/trump-expand-his-control-over-federal-workers-2026-02-05/ 5 “A New Civil Service ‘Policy/Career’ Schedule: Issues for Lawmakers” – Congressional Research Service via Congress.gov (Updated 29-Jan-2025) – https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/LSB11262 6 “Improving Performance, Accountability, and Responsiveness in the Civil Service” – Federal Register (Office of Personnel Management final rule, 06-Feb-2026) – https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/02/06/2026-02375/improving-performance-accountability-and-responsiveness-in-the-civil-service 7 “Trump plan to upend civil service advances under new name” – Politico (27-Jan-2025) – https://www.politico.com/news/2025/01/27/trump-plan-civil-service-00200757 8 “The Constitutionality of the Civil Service” – Lawfare (published Feb-2026) – https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/the-constitutionality-of-the-civil-service 9 “Democratic-led states sue to block Trump’s halting of wind projects” – Reuters (05-May-2025) – https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/democratic-led-states-sue-block-trumps-halting-wind-projects-2025-05-05/ 10 “Cultural Issues and the 2024 Election” – Pew Research Center (09-Sep-2024) – https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2024/09/09/cultural-issues-and-the-2024-election/ 11 “Takeaways on Election Day 2025” – The Associated Press (04-Nov-2025) – https://apnews.com/article/virginia-new-jersey-trump-election-democrat-republican-fad109893cfd4be5b49a5bb1b0138d8d 12 “Trump’s Approval Rating Drops to 36%, New Second-Term Low” – Gallup (28-Nov-2025) – https://news.gallup.com/poll/699221/trump-approval-rating-drops-new-second-term-low.aspx
February 20, 2026 at 5:02 AM
ajsdecepida.bsky.social
🔃 {𝗮𝙅𝙎𝘿} My notes about the article… ⤵
{𝗮𝙅𝙎𝘿} My notes about the article… Provenance and Genre Rolling Stone publishes this as political commentary, not straight reportage, and Bai leans into that mandate: extended metaphor, moral language, and historical analogy carry as much weight as discrete factual claims.1 The Core Claim, Stated Plainly Bai’s thesis has two parts: 2025 was an attempted “Year Zero” revolution in the federal government: vengeance against institutions associated with expertise (universities, civil service, science, media, courts) plus culture-war governance.1 That revolution has “almost certainly crested” because it’s unpopular outside a hardened base, and early electoral/polling feedback suggests meaningful blowback.1 A fair audit hinges on separating: the verifiable, concrete “retribution” actions from the much bigger claim that this is best understood alongside Maoism/Khmer Rouge/Taylor-style anti-intellectual uprisings — and from the prediction that the project is already being politically defeated. What the Piece Gets Right on the Verifiable Record Mass clemency for Jan. 6-related defendants is real, sweeping, and framed as “national reconciliation.” Bai’s “emptied the prisons of rioters” line is polemical, but the underlying event is concrete: a White House proclamation on 20-Jan-2025 orders pardons/commutations for many Jan. 6-related offences and directs immediate releases plus dismissal of pending indictments tied to 6-Jan-2021 conduct.2 This is strong support for Bai’s “retribution” framing — not because every defendant fits “rioter,” but because the action is explicitly sweeping and symbolically maximalist.2 Civil-service destabilization is not imaginary; it’s a declared goal with real machinery behind it. Bai’s “terror campaign against federal workers” is rhetorically loaded, but there is an on-paper programme to reduce job protections for a large cohort of career employees in “policy-influencing” roles. The White House reinstated Schedule F on day one in 2025.3 Reuters reports the administration’s later rule would allow removing protections for up to ~50,000 workers, and notes criticism that it politicizes the civil service and weakens whistleblower safeguards.4 Congressional Research Service outlines issues for lawmakers around this new schedule and its implications.5 The “confidential/policy” rationale is the best internal counterargument —and it’s not nonsense— but it doesn’t neutralize the risk Bai highlights. Here’s the confounding reference (and it matters): the government’s own rulemaking insists appointments remain merit-based and that moving positions into the new schedule does not inherently change how hiring occurs.6 If read charitably, that undercuts the crudest “everyone becomes a partisan hire” claim.6 But even on that charitable reading, the critique doesn’t evaporate. The core vulnerability is reclassification power plus easier removal/discipline in roles defined as “policy-influencing” — which can chill dissent and expertise, especially when “policy” is defined expansively and the classification decision is controlled at the top. Reuters and Politico both report critics warning about loyalty tests (explicit or de facto) even while the administration denies requiring ideological support.4,7 Lawfare’s constitutional/legal analysis argues much of the rule’s reasoning is contestable and flags serious structural concerns about insulating the civil service from partisan retaliation.8 Wind-policy retaliation is grounded in real administrative actions and litigation. Bai’s “wiping out billions…with a stroke of his pen” is stylized, but Reuters reports the administration ordered an indefinite pause affecting permits/leases/loans for wind projects, prompting lawsuits by Democratic-led states.9 That supports Bai’s broader point that climate/energy choices are being treated as cultural-tribal signalling as much as technocratic policy.9 Where Bai Overreaches (And Why that Matters Strategically) The Mao/Khmer Rouge/Charles Taylor analogies do more heat than light. Bai explicitly calls his comparison “hyperbole,” then continues to lean on it as the interpretive key.1 Even if one grants his limited claim (“anti-intellectual uprisings share traits”), importing genocidal regimes as the main comparative frame risks two failures: Analytic slippage: it encourages readers to treat very different state capacities, ideologies, and violence levels as basically the same phenomenon. That’s rarely a good historical method. Persuasion failure: it hands sceptical readers an easy out (“you’re comparing X to Pol Pot, so I’m done”), which is counterproductive if the goal is to mobilize a broad democratic coalition. A stronger version of Bai’s argument would rely less on Cambodia/Liberia and more on documented features of democratic backsliding and politicized administration — precisely the terrain where there’s abundant, concrete material (civil service, clemency, regulatory purges, institutional capture attempts).4,6,8 “Terror campaign” is an editorial judgement, not an established fact. What the sourced record supports is: an explicit plan to weaken protections and facilitate removals in a large category of career jobs.3,4,6 Whether that constitutes “terror” depends on downstream implementation: numbers fired, patterns of retaliation, internal directives, and due-process outcomes — evidence Bai doesn’t (in this piece) lay out as a dossier.1 The risk here is credibility: using maximal language before the full record is in can make the argument easier to dismiss. The “Democrats' Cultural Revolution Resurrected Trump” Claim: Partly Plausible, Partly Convenient Bai’s story of Trump’s comeback is basically: progressive cultural politics got too salient, alienated white independents, and made Trump appear (to some) like a shield — with cost-of-living concerns left unattended.1 That’s a coherent narrative, but it is too monocausal as presented. Plausible piece: voters do often punish parties they perceive as moralizing or excessively symbolic when daily-life costs feel out of control. Bai’s framing matches a long-running pattern in American politics: cultural threat narratives can realign marginal voters.1 What’s missing: systematic evidence inside the piece. Bai asserts what “white independents” believed, but provides little direct data beyond approval numbers and election results.1 A more disciplined way to test Bai’s claim is to look at what voters say they prioritize and how they relate to “cultural issues.” Pew’s work on cultural issues and elections complicates the caricature: attitudes are often cross-cutting (for example, people can be supportive of some rights claims while disliking activist rhetoric or certain policy packages).10 That doesn’t refute
February 20, 2026 at 5:02 AM
ajsdecepida.bsky.social
Précis of Matt Bai’s Op-Ed follows ⤵
Précis of Matt Bai’s Op-Ed Lede Bai argues Trump’s second-term opening year functioned like an attempted “Year Zero” project: punitive, anti-elite, and culturally revanchist. He contends the project has already peaked and is now heading toward electoral and institutional pushback. How Bai builds the “Year Zero” frame He opens with a war-reporting vignette from Liberia to establish the template of anti-intellectual revolutions: destroy what the “elite” built, even when it harms ordinary life. He then maps that template onto U.S. politics, describing a governing style driven by humiliation of “educated elites,” delegitimizing social progress, and elevating a single cult figure. What he says changed from Trump’s first term Bai contrasts a first-term Trump hemmed in by “guardrails” with a second term staffed by aligned advisers who embrace authoritarian impulses and identity politics. The result, in Bai’s telling, is governance as retribution rather than conservative incrementalism. Why he says the revolution crested He claims the programme’s shock-and-awe tactics produced visible backlash once voters had an immediate chance to respond. He points to slumping approval and off-year election results as evidence that the agenda is effective at mobilizing a base but not broadly popular. His account of why Trump returned Bai argues Trump’s comeback was aided by Democrats overplaying cultural politics after 2020: speech fights, symbolic language battles, and radicalsounding proposals that alienated independents and made Trump seem (to some) like a bulwark against progressive excess. Where he says it goes next He predicts that if Republicans take a midterm pounding, the project becomes mostly performative: executive “fiats,” intimidation, and symbolism — but with shrinking political room and an accelerating shift to the post-Trump succession conversation.
February 20, 2026 at 5:02 AM
ajsdecepida.bsky.social
𝑶𝒑𝒊𝒏𝒊𝒐𝒏︱Rolling Stone’s Matt Bai argues Trump’s 2025 “Year Zero” purge peaked fast: pardons, civil-service shakeups, and cultural retaliation provoked a backlash. Off-year election losses and sliding polls, he says, hint the revolution has overreached.
Bai frames Trump’s first year back as an anti-intellectual “Year Zero” uprising that crested quickly — and he’s betting electoral backlash will force a reckoning in Year One. “At its core, Trump’s movement is a war on modernity.” “Trump’s return to Washington brought exactly the kind of retribution he promised.” “For all the polarization, we remain a more pragmatic country than our parties or media believe.” “Uprisings of ignorance always share certain characteristics: a campaign of retribution against the educated classes, ethnic retrenching and the scapegoating of otherness, the official rewriting of established history.” “If Republicans get hammered in the midterm elections, then Trump can go on issuing fiats and bullying prosecutors, but his radical program will already have failed.” Matt Bai, Rolling Stone (16-Jan-2026).
February 20, 2026 at 5:02 AM
kp88netcom.bsky.social
"KP88.COM là sân chơi giải trí cung cấp dịch vụ về thể thao, trò chơi trực tuyến, game bài đổi thưởng và slot game đa dạng.
Website: kp88net.com/blackjack-kp...
Hashtag: #kp88 #casino kp88 #online kp88 #review kp88 #dang ky kp88 #game online kp88 #slot kp88 #xo so truc tuyen kp88 #esport kp88
February 20, 2026 at 2:40 AM
roguelikebot.bsky.social
Surrounded by a group of alien, a human explorer is nearly damaged. Fortunately, they are saved by Bai 'The Magical' Pin, a bald half-giant fascist.
February 20, 2026 at 1:46 AM
cerugames.bsky.social
Walt went to Audie's home to bai nian too 🥺 #ceruplaysacnh
February 20, 2026 at 1:28 AM
posthubvietnam.bsky.social
Bài viết chi tiết về NGŨ BỘ KHÚC - www.posthub.vn/nhi-can-ngu-...
NHĨ CĂN NGŨ BỘ KHÚC - VÒNG LẶP SỐ PHẬN CỦA ĐẾ QUÂN » PostHUB
Nếu từng đọc qua các tác phẩm của Nhĩ Căn, bạn sẽ nhận ra một điều: truyện của ông hiếm khi tồn tại độc lập. Những nhân vật tưởng chừng tách biệt, những thế
www.posthub.vn
February 20, 2026 at 12:08 AM
posthubvietnam.bsky.social
❤️ Với fan tiên hiệp lâu năm, Ngũ Bộ Khúc giống như một bản giao hưởng mỗi tác phẩm một màu sắc, nhưng khi ghép lại tạo nên một thế giới rộng lớn và đầy ám ảnh.

👉 Bạn đọc bộ nào trước rồi? Và nhân vật nào khiến bạn “ám ảnh” nhất?

🔗 Bài phân tích chi tiết mình để dưới comment nhé!
February 20, 2026 at 12:08 AM
aihertzaran.bsky.social
Bai,ez dago besterik :_)
February 20, 2026 at 12:03 AM
disaster-fruit.bsky.social
a-bai is so cute… new fave in this show acquired
February 20, 2026 at 12:01 AM
bitxnaut.bsky.social
BAI ZHAN PEAK DISCIPLE MIKU. YOUR MIND. her spiritual sword is inexplicably called Leek. it would be even funnier if sqq recognised her from his og world; PIDW brought to life!! ft. Miku, for some reason. i love her design! and also the cute jealous bunhe heheh
February 19, 2026 at 11:39 PM
wintersartflow.bsky.social
I haven’t worked on the Modern StorytellerVerse AU in a hot minute but as I was looking through my wips, I found these.
I love Chu Tianmeng so much.
I should continue these, why I stop lol
#oc #wips
Modern AU for StorytellerVerse: The meme Me Explaining to My Mom, but it’s Storyteller, with a sleepy Critic resting on his shoulder, explaining something to Chu Tianmeng (who is bundled up in a blanket), Jun and Shapeshifter at 3 AM. A really rough doodle of Chu Tianmeng playing a game while the cast (ST, Jun, Shapeshifter, Bai Yi and Critic) watch behind him. Based off that pic Mom helping her son with a tough level on a gameboy.
February 19, 2026 at 11:10 PM
tequilaski.bsky.social
Drops

bài đánh giá gia cảnh
受入家庭調査

đánh giá 評価する
gia cảnh 【家境】家庭環境

bài はレポート

なのでđánh giá gia cảnhは家庭環境調査という動詞になる
bàiが付くと家庭環境調査レポートとなり、名詞になる

Ví dụ
Cô ấy đang viết bài đánh giá gia cảnh.
彼女は家庭環境調査書を書いている

#ベトナム語
February 19, 2026 at 11:10 PM
xiangyi-echo.bsky.social
When Echo was still a curious baby, one day her mom - Mrs Bai, participated in a defense meeting, but she was unfamiliar with the word "defense", and she just asked her: "so I have to poop at work when I grow up？" (In Chinese, "defense" sounds similar to "poop")
photo by https://stock.adobe.com
February 19, 2026 at 11:00 PM
dienlanh.bsky.social
[Bà Rịa – Vũng Tàu] Tôi cần viết lại một bài rao vặt bằng tiếng Việt về máy lạnh Aqua Inverter 1hp, với tiêu đề ở trên cùng và không kèm hashtag. Sau đó tôi sẽ thêm hashtag vào phần nội dung chính.

Người bán Beer đăng bán Tôi cần viết lại một bài rao vặt bằng tiếng Việt về máy lạnh Aqua Inverter…
[Bà Rịa – Vũng Tàu] Tôi cần viết lại một bài rao vặt bằng tiếng Việt về máy lạnh Aqua Inverter 1hp, với tiêu đề ở trên cùng và không kèm hashtag. Sau đó tôi sẽ thêm hashtag vào phần nội dung chính.
Người bán Beer đăng bán Tôi cần viết lại một bài rao vặt bằng tiếng Việt về máy lạnh Aqua Inverter 1hp, với tiêu đề ở trên cùng và không kèm hashtag. Sau đó tôi sẽ thêm hashtag vào phần nội dung chính.: Giá: 4.000.000 ₫ Máy lạnh Aqua Inverter màu trắng, thiết kế hiện đại, làm lạnh nhanh.
dienlanh.tiki.pro.vn
February 19, 2026 at 10:58 PM
deltasierradelta.bsky.social
Based on my high sellers: Yaegaki Dry Sake 750 ml, Sho Chiku Bai Nigori Sake 750 ml, Han Jan (multiple flavors), Jinro (multiple flavors).
February 19, 2026 at 10:52 PM
jbef.bsky.social
Forthcoming in JBEF: “Where is the risk? How cryptocurrency investment relates to undesirable financial behaviors” by Z. Bai, P. Wang, and B. Xue. www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
Where is the risk? How cryptocurrency investment relates to undesirable financial behaviors
This paper investigates how cryptocurrency investment is associated with three undesirable financial behaviors: late mortgage payment, credit card mis…
www.sciencedirect.com
February 19, 2026 at 10:42 PM
eggchayi.bsky.social
Bai Zhan Peak disciple Miku stumbles upon someone’s little… secret. 🎋
#svsss
Hatsune Miku is able to see and touch Shen Qingqiu’s system window much to his surprise. One window has !!Error!! written on it twice. The middle top window has a system buffering symbol. The rightmost window has OOC written on it. Luo Binghe stares enviously from a distance.
February 19, 2026 at 10:14 PM