Google has launched a detailed investigation into a weeks-long security breach after discovering that a contractor with legitimate system privileges had been quietly collecting internal screenshots and confidential files tied to the Play Store ecosystem. The company uncovered the activity only after it had continued for several weeks, giving the individual enough time to gather sensitive technical data before being detected. According to verified cybersecurity reports, the contractor managed to access information that explained the internal functioning of the Play Store, Google’s global marketplace serving billions of Android users. The files reportedly included documentation describing the structure of Play Store infrastructure, the technical guardrails that screen malicious apps, and the compliance systems designed to meet international data protection laws. The exposure of such material presents serious risks, as it could help malicious actors identify weaknesses in Google’s defense systems or replicate its internal processes to deceive automated security checks. Upon discovery of the breach, Google initiated a forensic review to determine how much information was accessed and whether it was shared externally. The company has also reported the matter to law enforcement and begun a complete reassessment of its third-party access procedures. Internal sources indicate that Google is now tightening security for all contractor accounts by expanding multi-factor authentication requirements, deploying AI-based systems to detect suspicious activities such as repeated screenshot captures, and enforcing stricter segregation of roles and privileges. Additional measures include enhanced background checks for third-party employees who handle sensitive systems, as part of a larger overhaul of Google’s contractor risk management framework. Experts note that the incident arrives during a period of heightened regulatory attention on Google’s data protection and antitrust practices. The breach not only exposes potential security weaknesses but also raises broader concerns about insider threats, one of the most persistent and challenging issues in cybersecurity. Even companies that invest heavily in digital defenses remain vulnerable when authorized users intentionally misuse their access for personal gain or external collaboration. The incident has also revived discussion about earlier insider threat cases at Google. In one of the most significant examples, a former software engineer was charged with stealing confidential files related to Google’s artificial intelligence systems between 2022 and 2023. Investigators revealed that he had transferred hundreds of internal documents to personal cloud accounts and even worked with external companies while still employed at Google. That case, which resulted in multiple charges of trade secret theft and economic espionage, underlined how intellectual property theft by insiders can evolve into major national security concerns. For Google, the latest breach serves as another reminder that internal misuse, whether by employees or contractors remains a critical weak point. As the investigation continues, the company is expected to strengthen oversight across its global operations. Cybersecurity analysts emphasize that organizations managing large user platforms must combine strong technical barriers with vigilant monitoring of human behavior to prevent insider-led compromises before they escalate into large-scale risks.

Multi-Agent Systems guide based on X insights. Explore tech, uses, team, risks & AI's collaborative future!

In this Q&A, Microsoft’s Fabian Williams explains how Model Context Protocol brings structure, reliability and governance to prompt-based AI systems.

TikTok and EU regulation: Legal challenges and cross-jurisdictional insights

 Organizations are deploying AI at breakneck speed—so rapidly, in fact, that foundational safeguards like governance and access controls are being sidelined. The 2025 IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report, based on data from 600 breached companies, finds that 13% of organizations have suffered breaches involving AI systems, with 97% of those lacking basic AI access controls. IBM refers to this trend as “do‑it‑now AI adoption,” where businesses prioritize quick implementation over security.  The consequences are stark: systems deployed without oversight are more likely to be breached—and when breaches occur, they’re more costly. One emerging danger is “shadow AI”—the widespread use of AI tools by staff without IT approval. The report reveals that organizations facing breaches linked to shadow AI incurred about $670,000 more in costs than those without such unauthorized use.  Furthermore, 20% of surveyed organizations reported such breaches, yet only 37% had policies to manage or detect shadow AI. Despite these risks, companies that integrate AI and automation into their security operations are finding significant benefits. On average, such firms reduced breach costs by around $1.9 million and shortened incident response timelines by 80 days.  IBM’s Vice President of Data Security, Suja Viswesan, emphasized that this mismatch between rapid AI deployment and weak security infrastructure is creating critical vulnerabilities—essentially turning AI into a high-value target for attackers. Cybercriminals are increasingly weaponizing AI as well. A notable 16% of breaches now involve attackers using AI—frequently in phishing or deepfake impersonation campaigns—illustrating that AI is both a risk and a defensive asset.  On the cost front, global average data breach expenses have decreased slightly, falling to $4.44 million, partly due to faster containment via AI-enhanced response tools. However, U.S. breach costs soared to a record $10.22 million—underscoring how inconsistent security practices can dramatically affect financial outcomes.  IBM calls for organizations to build governance, compliance, and security into every step of AI adoption—not after deployment. Without policies, oversight, and access controls embedded from the start, the rapid embrace of AI could compromise trust, safety, and financial stability in the long run.

Each week, I share fresh, grounded reflections on what it really takes to shift from reliable executor to respected leader. Think frameworks—not fluff. Strategy—not spin. Identity-first leadership you can actually apply.

Building Trust in #AISystems: Key Principles for Ethical and Reliable AI Which of the five ethical AI principles involves making AI systems understandable and transparent to users and stakeholders? 1....

IBM has launched a new software stack aimed squarely at enterprise IT teams tasked with managing the complex governance and security challenges posed by autonomous AI systems.

Harnessing AI for a safer digital world was a lead panel at day two of London Tech Week 2025.

Artificial intelligence needs no introduction, driving new innovation and transforming the way people work.

Today, the Commission has launched a public consultation to gather input on implementing the AI Act's rules on high-risk AI systems.

 At the latest Google I/O developers conference, the tech giant introduced an unexpected innovation in online shopping: an AI-powered virtual try-on tool. This new feature lets users upload a photo of themselves and see how clothing items would appear on their body. By merging the image of the user with that of the garment, Google’s custom-built image generation model creates a realistic simulation of the outfit on the individual.  While the concept seems simple, the underlying AI technology is advanced. In a live demonstration, the tool appeared to function seamlessly. The feature is now available in the United States and is part of Google’s broader efforts to enhance the online shopping experience through AI integration. It’s particularly useful for people who often struggle to visualize how clothing will look on their body compared to how it appears on models.   However, the rollout of this tool raised valid questions about user privacy. AI systems that involve personal images often come with concerns over data usage. Addressing these worries, a Google representative clarified that uploaded photos are used exclusively for the try-on experience. The images are not stored for AI training, are not shared with other services or third parties, and users can delete or update their photos at any time. This level of privacy protection is notable in an industry where user data is typically leveraged to improve algorithms.  Given Google’s ongoing development of AI-driven tools, some expected the company to utilize this photo data for model training. Instead, the commitment to user privacy in this case suggests a more responsible approach. Virtual fitting technology isn’t entirely new. Retail and tech companies have been exploring similar ideas for years. Amazon, for instance, has experimented with AI tools in its fashion division. Google, however, claims its new tool offers a more in-depth understanding of diverse body types.  During the presentation, Vidhya Srinivasan, Google’s VP of ads and commerce, emphasized the system’s goal of accommodating different shapes and sizes more effectively. Past AI image tools have faced criticism for lacking diversity and realism. It’s unclear whether Google’s new tool will be more reliable across the board. Nevertheless, their assurance that user images won’t be used to train models helps build trust.  Although the virtual preview may not always perfectly reflect real-life appearances, this development points to a promising direction for AI in retail. If successful, it could improve customer satisfaction, reduce returns, and make online shopping a more personalized experience.

 Klarna Group Plc, the Sweden-based fintech company, is reassessing its heavy reliance on artificial intelligence (AI) in customer service after admitting the approach led to a decline in service quality. CEO and co-founder Sebastian Siemiatkowski acknowledged that cost-cutting took precedence over customer experience during a company-wide AI push that replaced hundreds of human agents.  Speaking at Klarna’s Stockholm headquarters, Siemiatkowski conceded, “As cost unfortunately seems to have been a too predominant evaluation factor when organizing this, what you end up having is lower quality.” The company had frozen hiring for over a year to scale its AI capabilities but now plans to recalibrate its customer service model.  In a strategic shift, Klarna is restarting recruitment for customer support roles — a rare move that reflects the company’s need to restore the quality of human interaction. A new pilot program is underway that allows remote workers — including students and individuals in rural areas — to provide customer service on-demand in an “Uber-like setup.” Currently, two agents are part of the trial. “We also know there are tons of Klarna users that are very passionate about our company and would enjoy working for us,” Siemiatkowski said.  He stressed the importance of giving customers the option to speak to a human, citing both brand and operational needs. Despite dialing back on AI-led customer support, Klarna is not walking away from AI altogether. The company is continuing to rebuild its tech stack with AI at the core, aiming to improve operational efficiency. It is also developing a digital financial assistant designed to help users secure better interest rates and insurance options.  Klarna maintains a close relationship with OpenAI, a collaboration that began in 2023. “We wanted to be [OpenAI’s] favorite guinea pig,” Siemiatkowski noted, reinforcing the company’s long-term commitment to leveraging AI. Klarna’s course correction follows a turbulent financial period. After peaking at a $45.6 billion valuation in 2021, the company saw its value drop to $6.7 billion in 2022. It has since rebounded and aims to raise $1 billion via an IPO, targeting a valuation exceeding $15 billion — though IPO plans have been paused due to market volatility.  The company’s 2024 announcement that AI was handling the workload of 700 human agents disrupted the call center industry, leading to a sharp drop in shares of Teleperformance SE, a major outsourcing firm. While Klarna is resuming hiring, its overall workforce is expected to shrink. “In a year’s time, we’ll probably be down to about 2,500 people from 3,000,” Siemiatkowski said, noting that attrition and further AI improvements will likely drive continued headcount reductions.