Children under fourteen face ban

Scholar power: 26.7%

Story's scientific field profile

Political science 32%, Law 26%, Communication & Media Studies 26%, Psychology 16%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Thom Brooks	21%	18	26.7%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

49.0%

19.4 h

1

26.7%

Ranking score

0.019

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Reposted by David Merrett

4%

Scholar power: 4.9%

Story's scientific field profile

Political science 32%, Law 26%, Communication & Media Studies 26%, Psychology 16%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 David Merrett	10%	24	4.9%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

48.0%

22.3 h

338

4.9%

Ranking score

0.016

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

The Guardian

@theguardian.com

‘It’s the most urgent public health issue’: Dr Rangan Chatterjee on screen time, mental health – and banning social media until 18

The hit podcaster, author and former GP says a failure to regulate big tech is ‘failing a generation of children’. He explains why he quit the NHS and why he wants a ban on screen-based homework

www.theguardian.com

February 16, 2026 at 7:39 AM

by David F. Labaree

12%

Scholar power: 12.9%

Story's scientific field profile

Political science 32%, Law 26%, Communication & Media Studies 26%, Psychology 16%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 David F. Labaree	8%	29	12.9%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

58.0%

15.9 h

0

12.9%

Ranking score

0.016

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

David Labaree

@dlabaree.bsky.social

Eli Stark-Elster — School Is Way Worse for Kids than Social Media

The post is an essay by Eli Stark-Elster from his Substack. Here's a link to the original. His argument is that -- although there's a lot of talk now about the damage that social media are doing to children and major efforts to ban…

Eli Stark-Elster — School Is Way Worse for Kids than Social Media

The post is an essay by Eli Stark-Elster from his Substack. Here's a link to the original. His argument is that -- although there's a lot of talk now about the damage that social media are doing to children and major efforts to ban social media use for anyone under 16 -- there's a bigger threat to the life and health of young people: attending school.

davidlabaree.com

February 16, 2026 at 2:02 PM

by Mark Priestley

18%

Scholar power: 18.4%

Story's scientific field profile

Political science 32%, Law 26%, Communication & Media Studies 26%, Psychology 16%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Mark Priestley	11%	31	18.4%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

50.0%

14.3 h

1

18.4%

Ranking score

0.015

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Prof Mark Priestley

@markrpriestley.bsky.social

Will this be the next U-turn?

Peter Stefanovic @peterstefanovic.bsky.social · 14h

BREAKING: Keir Starmer says he will 'move really fast' after a consultation into a social media ban for under-16s ends in the summer

The government has announced it will create new powers to make changes to the law around technology, meaning a ban could come in as soon as this year

February 16, 2026 at 3:42 PM

Reposted by Jack Stilgoe

3%

Scholar power: 3.9%

Story's scientific field profile

Political science 32%, Law 26%, Communication & Media Studies 26%, Psychology 16%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Jack Stilgoe	7%	31	3.9%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

60.0%

21.5 h

41

3.9%

Ranking score

0.014

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Kate Devlin

@drkatedevlin.bsky.social

"This is vibes-based policy making, not evidence-based policy making" — me talking on BBC Radio Scotland Breakfast just now about the MPs pushing for a social media ban for under 16s.

February 16, 2026 at 8:26 AM

Reposted by Mark Priestley

6%

Scholar power: 6.1%

Story's scientific field profile

Political science 32%, Law 26%, Communication & Media Studies 26%, Psychology 16%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Mark Priestley	11%	31	6.1%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

52.0%

14.4 h

0

6.1%

Ranking score

0.006

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Peter Stefanovic

@peterstefanovic.bsky.social

BREAKING: Keir Starmer says he will 'move really fast' after a consultation into a social media ban for under-16s ends in the summer

The government has announced it will create new powers to make changes to the law around technology, meaning a ban could come in as soon as this year

February 16, 2026 at 3:36 PM

Reposted by Thom Brooks

8%

Scholar power: 8.9%

Story's scientific field profile

Political science 32%, Law 26%, Communication & Media Studies 26%, Psychology 16%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Thom Brooks	21%	18	8.9%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

48.0%

22.3 h

1

8.9%

Ranking score

0.004

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Reposted by Lesley A. Hall

4%

Scholar power: 4.0%

Story's scientific field profile

Political science 32%, Law 26%, Communication & Media Studies 26%, Psychology 16%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Lesley A. Hall	9%	20	4.0%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

45.0%

23.3 h

14

4.0%

Ranking score

0.003

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Heather Burns

@heatherburnstech.bsky.social

I’ve picked up on an interesting vibe lately that pro-OSA and child safety groups are sussing that spending five years trying to rewrite the global internet (≠ platforms), whilst labelling anyone who criticised them pro-child abuse shills for Big Tech, achieved nothing.
www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...