Zworykin
@zwory85.bsky.social
Card collector. Cat owner. Giant nerd. Securities attorney. Not your attorney.
Producers / tech crew - love it. No notes. Let's keep doing it like this every single day.
January 6, 2026 at 5:33 AM
Producers / tech crew - love it. No notes. Let's keep doing it like this every single day.
Just gotta get used to adding "but I voted for Kamala" every time you answer the question.
January 5, 2026 at 7:50 PM
Just gotta get used to adding "but I voted for Kamala" every time you answer the question.
That's a given, for this interviewee.
January 5, 2026 at 3:11 AM
That's a given, for this interviewee.
I don't even think he's intentionally lying here. I think he's just so deep into his dementia that he actually believes this shit is true. It would be fucking sad if it weren't so fucking terrifying.
January 5, 2026 at 2:31 AM
I don't even think he's intentionally lying here. I think he's just so deep into his dementia that he actually believes this shit is true. It would be fucking sad if it weren't so fucking terrifying.
No, why would you listen to your doctors when you're much smarter than they are? After all, your uncle was an MIT professor and you went to Wharton.
January 2, 2026 at 9:32 PM
No, why would you listen to your doctors when you're much smarter than they are? After all, your uncle was an MIT professor and you went to Wharton.
Unfortunately, given his inability to read, he isn't likely to handle much paper. Alas!
January 2, 2026 at 4:58 AM
Unfortunately, given his inability to read, he isn't likely to handle much paper. Alas!
He'd only be the second most surprising one of that group to see in Heaven, though.
January 1, 2026 at 1:47 PM
He'd only be the second most surprising one of that group to see in Heaven, though.
The final question/answer on that excerpt, frankly, is even better. "Lawyering 101, dumbass."
December 31, 2025 at 10:11 PM
The final question/answer on that excerpt, frankly, is even better. "Lawyering 101, dumbass."
Respectfully, "please answer again the same question you've answered probably a hundred times before, which answers are already easily accessible to anyone with internet access" was not actually a serious question. Nor is "why haven't you summarized those answers for us so we don't have to work?"
December 31, 2025 at 6:53 PM
Respectfully, "please answer again the same question you've answered probably a hundred times before, which answers are already easily accessible to anyone with internet access" was not actually a serious question. Nor is "why haven't you summarized those answers for us so we don't have to work?"
Though shipping them all off to CECOT would be a start.
December 30, 2025 at 9:21 PM
Though shipping them all off to CECOT would be a start.
Does the law still matter too? Because that's not how the law works. Fun as it is to imagine...
December 21, 2025 at 12:34 AM
Does the law still matter too? Because that's not how the law works. Fun as it is to imagine...
You're wasting your time. You can't fix stupid. He was failed by his parents and teachers way too long ago and way too consistently for a stranger on the internet to have any hope.
December 20, 2025 at 4:23 PM
You're wasting your time. You can't fix stupid. He was failed by his parents and teachers way too long ago and way too consistently for a stranger on the internet to have any hope.
So in other words, Lutnick is also as numerically/mathematically illiterate as his gibbering gibbon of a boss. Got it.
December 19, 2025 at 1:03 AM
So in other words, Lutnick is also as numerically/mathematically illiterate as his gibbering gibbon of a boss. Got it.
The sheer amount of money that's going to have to be spent scrubbing his stain from the building - just the physical remnant, not the spiritual / reputational stains, which are likely permanent - is just ridiculous.
December 17, 2025 at 8:25 PM
The sheer amount of money that's going to have to be spent scrubbing his stain from the building - just the physical remnant, not the spiritual / reputational stains, which are likely permanent - is just ridiculous.
Since that would be illegal, yes, it's probably what he's going to do.
December 17, 2025 at 3:48 PM
Since that would be illegal, yes, it's probably what he's going to do.
WE DON'T HAVE "a" LANGUAGE, you fucking clown!
December 17, 2025 at 12:46 AM
WE DON'T HAVE "a" LANGUAGE, you fucking clown!
"It just was not to be" says the person who literally decides what is or isn't to be (in this context)? FFS.
December 17, 2025 at 12:07 AM
"It just was not to be" says the person who literally decides what is or isn't to be (in this context)? FFS.
Over the course of almost a year worth of repeated interviews? On the other hand, she's a Trump Administration official, so, yeah, she actually could be that stupid.
December 16, 2025 at 10:07 PM
Over the course of almost a year worth of repeated interviews? On the other hand, she's a Trump Administration official, so, yeah, she actually could be that stupid.
They couldn't find less competent people to work in this administration if they tried. And I'm pretty sure they did.
December 16, 2025 at 2:03 PM
They couldn't find less competent people to work in this administration if they tried. And I'm pretty sure they did.
He talks about the Butler one all the fucking time, actually. "That beautiful chart" etc.
December 16, 2025 at 5:09 AM
He talks about the Butler one all the fucking time, actually. "That beautiful chart" etc.
The orange-nosing remains unbelievable.
December 15, 2025 at 6:09 PM
The orange-nosing remains unbelievable.