Possible, I was referring in the main to the Abrahamic religions.

He already did the honorable thing.

https://bsky.app/profile/kenwhite.bsky.social/post/3k4xq4qpqfb2c

(I admit to opening bsky davka to monitor the popehat situation)

The counter-argument would be that unless (1) is expressly revoked, it trumps (6), and that moreover (7) is merely pointing that out.

The expectation would (should?) be that as an ex-President, he knew that a SCIF needs security.

Me too!
And love your ranking. But I’d put Hound of the Baskervilles at #2, close behind Valley of Fear.

Ultimately just every faith is (in its pure form) intolerant toward other faiths tho

Deleted 🤦🏼‍♂️

I keep waiting for DOJ to ask for a conflict review. They have not yet.

It is my considered opinion that while creating the world, the Lord took a leftover pot, then dumped a bunch of roads, off-ramps, weird U-turns and inscrutable road signs, all into said pot, stirred it several times over, and named the result New Jersey.

It seems that allowing the org’s lawyer to advise the client in such a case involves an obvious and unacceptable conflict of interest.
cc @kenwhite.bsky.social @gregdoucette.bsky.social

Question - in a normal situation (i.e. a normal judge), should the judge - or *anyone* - remind a defendant that chaining himself to counsel that acts for additional parties may run counter to his personal interest?

*urbanizes jesus*
*fixes your boulevard of dreams*

This sounds like a much better ending than the similarly-ending Twitter story

Hadn’t seen this when I posted this

You must have heard the one where they broke into the synagogue safe, and made off with $1.6M in pledges

https://bsky.app/profile/zuchmir.bsky.social/post/3k36aghjaxi2h

cout << clit

Or, if you will,

cin >> clit

(Trying to gauge how niche a joke this is)