Also, will they be teaching this legal definition in schools so people don't accidentally maintain non-standard appearances and behaviours that might result in unlawful exclusion?

Unsurprisingly, mine voted on the wrong side. I wish I could be disappointed by it but honestly he's one of the worst pieces of shit I've ever come across so it's hard to have a lower opinion of him than I already did. Fuck the people that voted for him.

Once again proving that the Labour party is more concerned about its public appearance than it is with standing up for what's right. To the surprise of probably no-one. So glad I can finally dare to consider feeling vaguely hopeful for a sensible and safe future.

They do. The difficulty is differentiating between performative "I accept you because it's easy and I don't have to do anything" and active ones that will fight for our rights. The latter exist but are unfortunately much harder to find. Which sucks because we need their voices more now than ever.

Does the old testament also define what clothes are coded for men and women respectively? Are trousers with pockets coded differently from those without? Is there a definition for the amount and configuration of material within a shirt that dictates which side of the line it belongs? Lazy writing!

Age verification:

C:\> park

I can't tell the difference between news and satire anymore...