For these freaks, "gender empowerment" means "toxic gender roles are awesome actually and you'll grow into them", unless when they need to appeal to femboy-loving anime nazis and TERFs, then they're "protecting femboys and tomboys from mutilation and stuff"

What I think what's happening is that the architects of Project2025 want to use payment processors to curb pornography through debanking, and globally if possible.

Unfortunately, they'll just bring up cases when creators were "bad", to signal how much "they deserve it", and will see things being pushed underground as a "great gatekeeping opportunity" (if they're not just pretending to be fans, to drive the wedge into the community)

"The Trump campaign created two decoy ops to drown out the information from my OpDeathEaters campaign: first Pizzagate, then Qanon." #3E

Also the Trump admin turned the previous anti-monopolistic efforts against Visa and Mastercard into a "slap on the wrist" suspiciously after the new wave of censorship.

Where are the furry hackers when we need more evindence for this?

Rondo has some fun times, too.

Evergreen.

I think Rev was just part of the "we need more conservative geeks to avoid censorship of geek media" push, that was popular in the early 2010's.

Are the chud gamers already seething over that?

Pixiv is better for art reasons (even if it's getting in a stranglehold by paypros), and it's also technically not allowed on Twitter, it's just barely moderated.

I have a conspiracy theory that most conspiracy theories are made to discredit the people pointing out real conspiracies.

If I remember, rev liked to frame all furries as zoos.

That's because all the "nazi lolicon pedophiles", who used loli to argue for lowering the age of consent (I had to clean up after them 🤮), and also people wanted to take the moral high ground after the Shadman-Keemstar drama...

Can we use the same exact logic on adult-adult CNC kinks?