zhihuachen.bsky.social
@zhihuachen.bsky.social
September 8, 2025 at 6:00 PM
www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
Here is another one. Couldn’t be sure if it’s a bs article until I saw the map: HK (Hong Kong?) in Taiwan, WH (Wuhan?) in Hunan, CD (Chengdu?) in Qinghai. 😇😇😇
Here is another one. Couldn’t be sure if it’s a bs article until I saw the map: HK (Hong Kong?) in Taiwan, WH (Wuhan?) in Hunan, CD (Chengdu?) in Qinghai. 😇😇😇
September 3, 2025 at 2:18 PM
www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
Here is another one. Couldn’t be sure if it’s a bs article until I saw the map: HK (Hong Kong?) in Taiwan, WH (Wuhan?) in Hunan, CD (Chengdu?) in Qinghai. 😇😇😇
Here is another one. Couldn’t be sure if it’s a bs article until I saw the map: HK (Hong Kong?) in Taiwan, WH (Wuhan?) in Hunan, CD (Chengdu?) in Qinghai. 😇😇😇
Yeah that figure was definitely generated with AI without any proofread.
Something new. The paper just assigns the corresponding author’s email to the dept-less NNU author.
Something new. The paper just assigns the corresponding author’s email to the dept-less NNU author.
September 2, 2025 at 1:04 PM
Yeah that figure was definitely generated with AI without any proofread.
Something new. The paper just assigns the corresponding author’s email to the dept-less NNU author.
Something new. The paper just assigns the corresponding author’s email to the dept-less NNU author.
The first two authors of the earlier Deusen article have another problematic paper.
www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
Figure 1 looks incomplete. And they might have dropped/forgotten the promised table 1.
www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
Figure 1 looks incomplete. And they might have dropped/forgotten the promised table 1.
September 1, 2025 at 10:06 PM
The first two authors of the earlier Deusen article have another problematic paper.
www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
Figure 1 looks incomplete. And they might have dropped/forgotten the promised table 1.
www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
Figure 1 looks incomplete. And they might have dropped/forgotten the promised table 1.
I wonder if David Deusen is real. Showing up dept-less Beijing Normal U in 2024, and dept-less Nanjing U in 2025.
Kong and Gao are real.
Kong and Gao are real.
September 1, 2025 at 8:37 PM
I wonder if David Deusen is real. Showing up dept-less Beijing Normal U in 2024, and dept-less Nanjing U in 2025.
Kong and Gao are real.
Kong and Gao are real.
They say it’s figure upload error.
September 1, 2025 at 8:23 PM
They say it’s figure upload error.
Yeah. AI figure 1. That’s not southwest chjna.
September 1, 2025 at 8:14 PM
Yeah. AI figure 1. That’s not southwest chjna.
Affiliations and emails just changed!
September 1, 2025 at 1:01 PM
Affiliations and emails just changed!
Found my qi12@gmail.com. 😅
August 30, 2025 at 9:45 PM
Found my qi12@gmail.com. 😅
co12@gmail.com
August 29, 2025 at 8:06 PM
co12@gmail.com
August 29, 2025 at 7:48 PM
Another one in Ecological Indicators.
Gibberish annotations in fig 1.
www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
Gibberish annotations in fig 1.
www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
August 28, 2025 at 5:24 PM
Another one in Ecological Indicators.
Gibberish annotations in fig 1.
www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
Gibberish annotations in fig 1.
www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
Here is another one!
Title says Yangtze River basin. But text is all Mekong. And figure 5 is in between: caption says Mekong but annotation in the figure has Dongting lake and Eastern Anhui. 😇
Nanjing Normal U w/o specifying department seems a signature.
www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
Title says Yangtze River basin. But text is all Mekong. And figure 5 is in between: caption says Mekong but annotation in the figure has Dongting lake and Eastern Anhui. 😇
Nanjing Normal U w/o specifying department seems a signature.
www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
August 28, 2025 at 3:33 PM
Here is another one!
Title says Yangtze River basin. But text is all Mekong. And figure 5 is in between: caption says Mekong but annotation in the figure has Dongting lake and Eastern Anhui. 😇
Nanjing Normal U w/o specifying department seems a signature.
www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
Title says Yangtze River basin. But text is all Mekong. And figure 5 is in between: caption says Mekong but annotation in the figure has Dongting lake and Eastern Anhui. 😇
Nanjing Normal U w/o specifying department seems a signature.
www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
Correcting two cells (frame shifting deletion 😂). No change to the sum columns though.
June 25, 2025 at 8:28 PM
Correcting two cells (frame shifting deletion 😂). No change to the sum columns though.
Possibly 南系官话 influence.
June 25, 2025 at 7:31 PM
Possibly 南系官话 influence.
Took some scolding. 😅
June 12, 2025 at 5:40 PM
Took some scolding. 😅
I was going to do another 听说冰会化 but I ran out of ChatGPT image gen quota. 😆
June 12, 2025 at 5:20 PM
I was going to do another 听说冰会化 but I ran out of ChatGPT image gen quota. 😆
This was another thing that felt odd to me yesterday on abcnews.
abcnews.go.com/amp/Politics...
To save you the suspense, it’s a statistics textbook. 🤷♂️
www.ccapedu.com/book/5647.html
abcnews.go.com/amp/Politics...
To save you the suspense, it’s a statistics textbook. 🤷♂️
www.ccapedu.com/book/5647.html
June 4, 2025 at 11:44 PM
This was another thing that felt odd to me yesterday on abcnews.
abcnews.go.com/amp/Politics...
To save you the suspense, it’s a statistics textbook. 🤷♂️
www.ccapedu.com/book/5647.html
abcnews.go.com/amp/Politics...
To save you the suspense, it’s a statistics textbook. 🤷♂️
www.ccapedu.com/book/5647.html
微(wei)远(yuan)基(ji)因 (yin) is the company’s Chinese name.
May 3, 2025 at 4:57 AM
微(wei)远(yuan)基(ji)因 (yin) is the company’s Chinese name.
Looking more into this. The recentness of when Shi lab obtained sequences of the viral material in sample 4991 is even acknowledged in the pamphlet of LL theorists themselves, noting the spike protein was likely sequenced in late 2018 after improvement in primer design.
March 20, 2025 at 9:57 PM
Looking more into this. The recentness of when Shi lab obtained sequences of the viral material in sample 4991 is even acknowledged in the pamphlet of LL theorists themselves, noting the spike protein was likely sequenced in late 2018 after improvement in primer design.
This part of the article is pretty bad.
1) It’s uncertain what struck the miners in the cave. Viral infection was a suspicion but it was never proven. One of the two consulting sessions thought it was fungal and, in fact even in the judgement of the other consulting session that suspected it …
1) It’s uncertain what struck the miners in the cave. Viral infection was a suspicion but it was never proven. One of the two consulting sessions thought it was fungal and, in fact even in the judgement of the other consulting session that suspected it …
March 19, 2025 at 7:59 PM
This part of the article is pretty bad.
1) It’s uncertain what struck the miners in the cave. Viral infection was a suspicion but it was never proven. One of the two consulting sessions thought it was fungal and, in fact even in the judgement of the other consulting session that suspected it …
1) It’s uncertain what struck the miners in the cave. Viral infection was a suspicion but it was never proven. One of the two consulting sessions thought it was fungal and, in fact even in the judgement of the other consulting session that suspected it …