Zero.Zero
@zero-point-zero.bsky.social
musician | reader | biker | electron-pusher | hard-LEFT | pro-WORKER/LABOR
HarleyDavidson -- KaliLinux
N.Y.C.- L.E.S. WARZONE ABCity
•no facebook •no insta •no whatswhatever >> just telegram, xda, github
HarleyDavidson -- KaliLinux
N.Y.C.- L.E.S. WARZONE ABCity
•no facebook •no insta •no whatswhatever >> just telegram, xda, github
wasn't the whole shutdown to force not just a vote but actual subsidies extension?
and they got a "promise" for a "vote", but now they needed to get signatures for that vote?
essentially, fighting to keep handing $ to ins companies
can someone remind EVERYONE that THIS ISNT ACTUAL HEALTHCARE?
and they got a "promise" for a "vote", but now they needed to get signatures for that vote?
essentially, fighting to keep handing $ to ins companies
can someone remind EVERYONE that THIS ISNT ACTUAL HEALTHCARE?
December 19, 2025 at 5:04 AM
wasn't the whole shutdown to force not just a vote but actual subsidies extension?
and they got a "promise" for a "vote", but now they needed to get signatures for that vote?
essentially, fighting to keep handing $ to ins companies
can someone remind EVERYONE that THIS ISNT ACTUAL HEALTHCARE?
and they got a "promise" for a "vote", but now they needed to get signatures for that vote?
essentially, fighting to keep handing $ to ins companies
can someone remind EVERYONE that THIS ISNT ACTUAL HEALTHCARE?
made me a fan for a few fun seconds
December 19, 2025 at 4:55 AM
made me a fan for a few fun seconds
that HAS to be comforting
December 19, 2025 at 4:52 AM
that HAS to be comforting
the fun part of being pro labor the US:
they just call us commies anyway!😅😂😂
they just call us commies anyway!😅😂😂
a cat wearing a hat with a red hammer and sickle on it
ALT: a cat wearing a hat with a red hammer and sickle on it
media.tenor.com
December 19, 2025 at 4:40 AM
the fun part of being pro labor the US:
they just call us commies anyway!😅😂😂
they just call us commies anyway!😅😂😂
I don't think left needs to be communist
left can mean radical labor to some...like me
its a word like socialist...to some shitheads today, Eisenhower would be socialist 😁😂
but look at the actual 'sewer' socialist mayors in the US, for example
they were a far cry from Che...
left can mean radical labor to some...like me
its a word like socialist...to some shitheads today, Eisenhower would be socialist 😁😂
but look at the actual 'sewer' socialist mayors in the US, for example
they were a far cry from Che...
December 19, 2025 at 4:33 AM
I don't think left needs to be communist
left can mean radical labor to some...like me
its a word like socialist...to some shitheads today, Eisenhower would be socialist 😁😂
but look at the actual 'sewer' socialist mayors in the US, for example
they were a far cry from Che...
left can mean radical labor to some...like me
its a word like socialist...to some shitheads today, Eisenhower would be socialist 😁😂
but look at the actual 'sewer' socialist mayors in the US, for example
they were a far cry from Che...
Chomsky (yes, left) would say that in the articulate opinion there's no left....just left and right factions of the dominant right sector
still...that's not the same as what exists despite marginalization
the fact that everyone and their brother has a different definitions of "left" doesn't help 😁
still...that's not the same as what exists despite marginalization
the fact that everyone and their brother has a different definitions of "left" doesn't help 😁
December 19, 2025 at 4:29 AM
Chomsky (yes, left) would say that in the articulate opinion there's no left....just left and right factions of the dominant right sector
still...that's not the same as what exists despite marginalization
the fact that everyone and their brother has a different definitions of "left" doesn't help 😁
still...that's not the same as what exists despite marginalization
the fact that everyone and their brother has a different definitions of "left" doesn't help 😁
its crazy how mad they get when I say I don't want a CAREER PROSECUTOR regardless of their gender or race
somehow I get called names by SOMEONE, every time
somehow I get called names by SOMEONE, every time
December 19, 2025 at 4:21 AM
its crazy how mad they get when I say I don't want a CAREER PROSECUTOR regardless of their gender or race
somehow I get called names by SOMEONE, every time
somehow I get called names by SOMEONE, every time
or a fucking career prosecutor
December 19, 2025 at 4:17 AM
or a fucking career prosecutor
good for you!
this "you NEED to vote for my guy (gal), even tho he (she) sucks, cause its an EMERGENCY, and the other guys so much worse....we'll make improvements LATER" shits been going on for 40 years
these motherfuckers need to learn that there IS a hill we will fucking die on
this "you NEED to vote for my guy (gal), even tho he (she) sucks, cause its an EMERGENCY, and the other guys so much worse....we'll make improvements LATER" shits been going on for 40 years
these motherfuckers need to learn that there IS a hill we will fucking die on
December 19, 2025 at 4:16 AM
good for you!
this "you NEED to vote for my guy (gal), even tho he (she) sucks, cause its an EMERGENCY, and the other guys so much worse....we'll make improvements LATER" shits been going on for 40 years
these motherfuckers need to learn that there IS a hill we will fucking die on
this "you NEED to vote for my guy (gal), even tho he (she) sucks, cause its an EMERGENCY, and the other guys so much worse....we'll make improvements LATER" shits been going on for 40 years
these motherfuckers need to learn that there IS a hill we will fucking die on
voting's OK I guess
organizing better
cause then, they try to take your rights, you take that power from them
organizing better
cause then, they try to take your rights, you take that power from them
December 19, 2025 at 4:11 AM
voting's OK I guess
organizing better
cause then, they try to take your rights, you take that power from them
organizing better
cause then, they try to take your rights, you take that power from them
i admit to prejudice on this point:
no career prosecutor gets my vote, ever
no career prosecutor gets my vote, ever
December 19, 2025 at 3:21 AM
i admit to prejudice on this point:
no career prosecutor gets my vote, ever
no career prosecutor gets my vote, ever
I'd love to see Liz Warren running the show
December 19, 2025 at 3:19 AM
I'd love to see Liz Warren running the show
its time for us to accept that the role of corporate democrats is fail working people while loudly bemoaning how working people are being failed
December 19, 2025 at 3:17 AM
its time for us to accept that the role of corporate democrats is fail working people while loudly bemoaning how working people are being failed
we are getting pretty damn good at it tho...
December 19, 2025 at 2:53 AM
we are getting pretty damn good at it tho...
the fact that the US Democrats haven't made a robust stand on this no-brainer issue, and have let corporate propaganda carry the day speaks volumes
the facts write the damn argument....so, what's the hassle?
the facts write the damn argument....so, what's the hassle?
December 19, 2025 at 2:50 AM
the fact that the US Democrats haven't made a robust stand on this no-brainer issue, and have let corporate propaganda carry the day speaks volumes
the facts write the damn argument....so, what's the hassle?
the facts write the damn argument....so, what's the hassle?
I'm not advocating voting republican
but ive been watching these corporate dems fuck us just about as hard as the other side for 40 years
that's why we are here, now
I'm advocating changing democrat strategy and candidates
because if that doesn't happen, its over
we've had it
but ive been watching these corporate dems fuck us just about as hard as the other side for 40 years
that's why we are here, now
I'm advocating changing democrat strategy and candidates
because if that doesn't happen, its over
we've had it
December 19, 2025 at 2:41 AM
I'm not advocating voting republican
but ive been watching these corporate dems fuck us just about as hard as the other side for 40 years
that's why we are here, now
I'm advocating changing democrat strategy and candidates
because if that doesn't happen, its over
we've had it
but ive been watching these corporate dems fuck us just about as hard as the other side for 40 years
that's why we are here, now
I'm advocating changing democrat strategy and candidates
because if that doesn't happen, its over
we've had it
no
your argument keeps devolving into thinly veiled ad hominem attacks
this last post is more of the same
its weak, achieves nothing, and demonstrates zero self awareness in respect to your own position
your argument keeps devolving into thinly veiled ad hominem attacks
this last post is more of the same
its weak, achieves nothing, and demonstrates zero self awareness in respect to your own position
December 17, 2025 at 4:21 PM
no
your argument keeps devolving into thinly veiled ad hominem attacks
this last post is more of the same
its weak, achieves nothing, and demonstrates zero self awareness in respect to your own position
your argument keeps devolving into thinly veiled ad hominem attacks
this last post is more of the same
its weak, achieves nothing, and demonstrates zero self awareness in respect to your own position
I don't like the repeated characterization in your argument
I've said all I have to say here
good luck
I've said all I have to say here
good luck
December 17, 2025 at 4:17 PM
I don't like the repeated characterization in your argument
I've said all I have to say here
good luck
I've said all I have to say here
good luck
don't scold me
ive articulated my position clearly in every post
I'm not the one who opened my comments with hyperbole
perhaps examine your own approach in respect to your core criticism
have a good day
ive articulated my position clearly in every post
I'm not the one who opened my comments with hyperbole
perhaps examine your own approach in respect to your core criticism
have a good day
December 17, 2025 at 4:15 PM
don't scold me
ive articulated my position clearly in every post
I'm not the one who opened my comments with hyperbole
perhaps examine your own approach in respect to your core criticism
have a good day
ive articulated my position clearly in every post
I'm not the one who opened my comments with hyperbole
perhaps examine your own approach in respect to your core criticism
have a good day
i will ALWAYS be against neoliberal policy no matter where it comes from
and moving "right", or "law and order", or "national security" to be "electable" means more of the same
it NEEDS to be fought, because its the problem
especially if its inside your own org
these are radical times
get radical
and moving "right", or "law and order", or "national security" to be "electable" means more of the same
it NEEDS to be fought, because its the problem
especially if its inside your own org
these are radical times
get radical
December 17, 2025 at 4:10 PM
i will ALWAYS be against neoliberal policy no matter where it comes from
and moving "right", or "law and order", or "national security" to be "electable" means more of the same
it NEEDS to be fought, because its the problem
especially if its inside your own org
these are radical times
get radical
and moving "right", or "law and order", or "national security" to be "electable" means more of the same
it NEEDS to be fought, because its the problem
especially if its inside your own org
these are radical times
get radical
some kind of "splitting" might be what energizes everyone (the majority) who isn't engaged
I'm not advocating choosing a Vance over a Harris at an election
but I am advocating a Warren over either
I'm not advocating choosing a Vance over a Harris at an election
but I am advocating a Warren over either
December 17, 2025 at 4:05 PM
some kind of "splitting" might be what energizes everyone (the majority) who isn't engaged
I'm not advocating choosing a Vance over a Harris at an election
but I am advocating a Warren over either
I'm not advocating choosing a Vance over a Harris at an election
but I am advocating a Warren over either
criticisms doesn't need to be seen as "tearing down"
what's wrong with "demanding more"...or "better"?
what's wrong with "demanding more"...or "better"?
December 17, 2025 at 4:01 PM
criticisms doesn't need to be seen as "tearing down"
what's wrong with "demanding more"...or "better"?
what's wrong with "demanding more"...or "better"?
that's a mischaracterization
valid criticism of a candidate is necessary if you expect better candidates
others wont accept unacceptable conditions simply because someone has declared they are "reality"
"reality" changed when the wolves were at the gate in the 1930s
the wolves are at the gate
valid criticism of a candidate is necessary if you expect better candidates
others wont accept unacceptable conditions simply because someone has declared they are "reality"
"reality" changed when the wolves were at the gate in the 1930s
the wolves are at the gate
December 17, 2025 at 4:00 PM
that's a mischaracterization
valid criticism of a candidate is necessary if you expect better candidates
others wont accept unacceptable conditions simply because someone has declared they are "reality"
"reality" changed when the wolves were at the gate in the 1930s
the wolves are at the gate
valid criticism of a candidate is necessary if you expect better candidates
others wont accept unacceptable conditions simply because someone has declared they are "reality"
"reality" changed when the wolves were at the gate in the 1930s
the wolves are at the gate