Dritan Nikolla
@zeno-paradox.bsky.social
Psychologist at UEL, London. Liberal, woke, hate dictators, love books, passionate about philosophy. No DMs please, it’s just not that kind of platform.
“Dark forces are stirring up anger” - says Shabama Mahmood - “so let’s turn the state’s resources on causing pointless suffering on some foreign children, so we satisfy these forces” - she continued.
November 16, 2025 at 11:38 PM
“Dark forces are stirring up anger” - says Shabama Mahmood - “so let’s turn the state’s resources on causing pointless suffering on some foreign children, so we satisfy these forces” - she continued.
God: you can defeat the far right but voters need to see how sh1t they are at government first.
October 30, 2025 at 10:50 AM
God: you can defeat the far right but voters need to see how sh1t they are at government first.
It seems the Trump crowd will not have it as easy as it now looks to turn America to authoritarianism.
October 18, 2025 at 8:55 PM
It seems the Trump crowd will not have it as easy as it now looks to turn America to authoritarianism.
ANTIFA, if called by its full name not by its abbreviation, it’s impossible to defame. How would it sound like- ‘those antifascist terrorists’? Ditch the abbreviation, called it by its proper name.
October 18, 2025 at 8:52 PM
ANTIFA, if called by its full name not by its abbreviation, it’s impossible to defame. How would it sound like- ‘those antifascist terrorists’? Ditch the abbreviation, called it by its proper name.
This is a very public test of the integrity of our laws. Let’s see how it goes.
October 3, 2025 at 7:18 AM
This is a very public test of the integrity of our laws. Let’s see how it goes.
It seems that to transform the rights of a population known for its fierce defence of its rights to own guns so the government doesn’t infringe on their rights, or so they have convinced themselves, all you need is an orange clown and 8 months in office, and it’s done.
October 3, 2025 at 6:46 AM
It seems that to transform the rights of a population known for its fierce defence of its rights to own guns so the government doesn’t infringe on their rights, or so they have convinced themselves, all you need is an orange clown and 8 months in office, and it’s done.
I agree with you more than it perhaps seems at first look. But I don’t see anyone else able to command the tide, media and public, so as to avoid some of the more extreme threats to parts of our society. Whether by design or not, a part of the population I belong to, is between a rock and hard place
October 2, 2025 at 10:06 AM
I agree with you more than it perhaps seems at first look. But I don’t see anyone else able to command the tide, media and public, so as to avoid some of the more extreme threats to parts of our society. Whether by design or not, a part of the population I belong to, is between a rock and hard place
The ILR rights removal, re migration and so forth. These are extreme terms, normalised at a lighting speed. That is hugely threatening.
October 2, 2025 at 9:57 AM
The ILR rights removal, re migration and so forth. These are extreme terms, normalised at a lighting speed. That is hugely threatening.
“Literally having peaceful anti-genocide protesters arrested” - it’s a bit more complicated than that, I am sure you agree. By the way, they shouldn’t be arrested - that is a massive joke.
What I am saying is that for some people, myself included, the level of threat we are seeing is no joke.
What I am saying is that for some people, myself included, the level of threat we are seeing is no joke.
October 2, 2025 at 9:36 AM
“Literally having peaceful anti-genocide protesters arrested” - it’s a bit more complicated than that, I am sure you agree. By the way, they shouldn’t be arrested - that is a massive joke.
What I am saying is that for some people, myself included, the level of threat we are seeing is no joke.
What I am saying is that for some people, myself included, the level of threat we are seeing is no joke.
@danhowdle.bsky.social These are all correct examples. You also have to ask why? The answer to why is not, I think, what you are suggesting. He is trying to capture some voters who seem hell bent on unleashing the worst of humanity though our politics. Starmer last speech showed what he truly feels.
October 2, 2025 at 7:33 AM
@danhowdle.bsky.social These are all correct examples. You also have to ask why? The answer to why is not, I think, what you are suggesting. He is trying to capture some voters who seem hell bent on unleashing the worst of humanity though our politics. Starmer last speech showed what he truly feels.
The names of these ICE Agents will eventually be known, and with that their back stories. Anyone want to take bets against the proposition that we’ll find out many of them are members of one far right group or another?
October 2, 2025 at 6:32 AM
The names of these ICE Agents will eventually be known, and with that their back stories. Anyone want to take bets against the proposition that we’ll find out many of them are members of one far right group or another?