Zeik
@zeikcied.bsky.social
41
He/She/They
Mostly a watcher account, at least for now.
He/She/They
Mostly a watcher account, at least for now.
Also like, reportedly over 70% of Twitter traffic is now bots. People refusing to leave the site because their engagement numbers are so much higher there need to realize that it's almost all fake numbers inflated by bot traffic.
December 29, 2025 at 7:19 AM
Also like, reportedly over 70% of Twitter traffic is now bots. People refusing to leave the site because their engagement numbers are so much higher there need to realize that it's almost all fake numbers inflated by bot traffic.
I mean, Jesus gave no exceptions when he said "Love thy neighbor." Part of his thing was about using the power of God's love to expel evil. So using Christianity to justify hatred of anyone, regardless of the sins they commit, is heresy.
And it's sad that atheists know this better than Christians.
And it's sad that atheists know this better than Christians.
December 5, 2025 at 7:22 PM
I mean, Jesus gave no exceptions when he said "Love thy neighbor." Part of his thing was about using the power of God's love to expel evil. So using Christianity to justify hatred of anyone, regardless of the sins they commit, is heresy.
And it's sad that atheists know this better than Christians.
And it's sad that atheists know this better than Christians.
(3/3)
So you got a raise from your job, you're trying to get off of SSI, but now you're out $435/month because you got a raise from your job. The system is explicitly rigged to make it as hard as possible to work your way off of it.
So you got a raise from your job, you're trying to get off of SSI, but now you're out $435/month because you got a raise from your job. The system is explicitly rigged to make it as hard as possible to work your way off of it.
November 10, 2025 at 7:21 PM
(3/3)
So you got a raise from your job, you're trying to get off of SSI, but now you're out $435/month because you got a raise from your job. The system is explicitly rigged to make it as hard as possible to work your way off of it.
So you got a raise from your job, you're trying to get off of SSI, but now you're out $435/month because you got a raise from your job. The system is explicitly rigged to make it as hard as possible to work your way off of it.
(2/3)
If you earn $1,990/month from a job, you get that $450 from SSI, for a total of $2,440/month. Then let's say your boss gives you a raise, and now you earn $2,005/month. You now earn too much for SSI, they cut you, and instead of getting $2,440/month, you only get the $2,005/month.
If you earn $1,990/month from a job, you get that $450 from SSI, for a total of $2,440/month. Then let's say your boss gives you a raise, and now you earn $2,005/month. You now earn too much for SSI, they cut you, and instead of getting $2,440/month, you only get the $2,005/month.
November 10, 2025 at 7:21 PM
(2/3)
If you earn $1,990/month from a job, you get that $450 from SSI, for a total of $2,440/month. Then let's say your boss gives you a raise, and now you earn $2,005/month. You now earn too much for SSI, they cut you, and instead of getting $2,440/month, you only get the $2,005/month.
If you earn $1,990/month from a job, you get that $450 from SSI, for a total of $2,440/month. Then let's say your boss gives you a raise, and now you earn $2,005/month. You now earn too much for SSI, they cut you, and instead of getting $2,440/month, you only get the $2,005/month.
Somewhat related, there's a hard minimum amount you get from SSI, along with a maximum monthly income you can earn from a job. I don't know the exact numbers. Let's say as an example the min you can get from SSI is $450/month, and your max earned income is $2,000/month.
(1/3)
(1/3)
November 10, 2025 at 7:21 PM
Somewhat related, there's a hard minimum amount you get from SSI, along with a maximum monthly income you can earn from a job. I don't know the exact numbers. Let's say as an example the min you can get from SSI is $450/month, and your max earned income is $2,000/month.
(1/3)
(1/3)
Hey Dems, you lost because the larger voting block, the ones that you're best capable of serving, is turned away by your constant insistence of chasing the moderates rather than going for people who will actually vote for you. You keep blaming the left, when you're the reason they won't support you.
September 18, 2025 at 5:52 AM
Hey Dems, you lost because the larger voting block, the ones that you're best capable of serving, is turned away by your constant insistence of chasing the moderates rather than going for people who will actually vote for you. You keep blaming the left, when you're the reason they won't support you.
But they'd have so many more voters, so much more support, if they just moved and stayed left. Their hubris and assumption that they have the left on lock continuously serves as their downfall. They alienate the left, making them apathetic, and then wonder why they lost.
September 18, 2025 at 5:52 AM
But they'd have so many more voters, so much more support, if they just moved and stayed left. Their hubris and assumption that they have the left on lock continuously serves as their downfall. They alienate the left, making them apathetic, and then wonder why they lost.
Dems have been chasing the "moderate voter" for decades. And as the GOP moves right, the Dems move right, too. Hoping to catch any disenfranchised Republicans. They keep assuming they'll always have the support of the left, because the alternative is worse.
September 18, 2025 at 5:52 AM
Dems have been chasing the "moderate voter" for decades. And as the GOP moves right, the Dems move right, too. Hoping to catch any disenfranchised Republicans. They keep assuming they'll always have the support of the left, because the alternative is worse.
As an aside, the exact same thing is happening with LGBTQ. Trans people first, because they're "icky." Bisexual people got erased from Stonewall, too. Gays and lesbians? You're next. Because it was never about trans people, it was about erasing LGBTQ entirely. Trans people were just the wedge.
July 28, 2025 at 7:08 PM
As an aside, the exact same thing is happening with LGBTQ. Trans people first, because they're "icky." Bisexual people got erased from Stonewall, too. Gays and lesbians? You're next. Because it was never about trans people, it was about erasing LGBTQ entirely. Trans people were just the wedge.
Y'all refused to believe it would happen, but it has. And the only way to prevent it from happening again is to get them to remove the ban on all fictional stuff, especially the "icky" topics. Because if we don't, they will try again.
July 28, 2025 at 7:08 PM
Y'all refused to believe it would happen, but it has. And the only way to prevent it from happening again is to get them to remove the ban on all fictional stuff, especially the "icky" topics. Because if we don't, they will try again.
It was never about the "icky" stuff. This was always the end goal. Banning all fictional porn. A more concerted effort on real life porn will surely follow. It's the slippery slope in action, folks.
July 28, 2025 at 7:08 PM
It was never about the "icky" stuff. This was always the end goal. Banning all fictional porn. A more concerted effort on real life porn will surely follow. It's the slippery slope in action, folks.
And the loli/shota fans should be yelling that they told you this would happen. Way back then, y'all were like, they'll never ban all porn. Too many people love porn. It'll never work. They're just banning the icky stuff. Well, look where we're at now, motherfuckers.
July 28, 2025 at 7:08 PM
And the loli/shota fans should be yelling that they told you this would happen. Way back then, y'all were like, they'll never ban all porn. Too many people love porn. It'll never work. They're just banning the icky stuff. Well, look where we're at now, motherfuckers.
Incest, bestiality, hypnosis, mind control, rape, those each got banned bit by bit. And because they were also "icky," people were generally okay. See, you warm people up to the idea of bans by going for the "icky" stuff first. So now they're going after "normal" fictional porn.
July 28, 2025 at 7:08 PM
Incest, bestiality, hypnosis, mind control, rape, those each got banned bit by bit. And because they were also "icky," people were generally okay. See, you warm people up to the idea of bans by going for the "icky" stuff first. So now they're going after "normal" fictional porn.
They started by banning loli/shota. Probably the least liked and hardest to defend theme in fictional porn. And a lot of people were okay with that. Then they started moving up the ladder of "icky" themes.
July 28, 2025 at 7:08 PM
They started by banning loli/shota. Probably the least liked and hardest to defend theme in fictional porn. And a lot of people were okay with that. Then they started moving up the ladder of "icky" themes.
A UI update broke custom thumbnails, I wanna say, like 13 years ago? It's been a very long time. One of their news posts in the last month or so said they planned on fixing them, finally.
June 2, 2025 at 5:21 AM
A UI update broke custom thumbnails, I wanna say, like 13 years ago? It's been a very long time. One of their news posts in the last month or so said they planned on fixing them, finally.
Hope you can find something to be happy about sooner than later.
May 2, 2025 at 6:07 AM
Hope you can find something to be happy about sooner than later.
I can't handle games like Minecraft. I need some kind of goal. Even the most minor one. Plop me in a sandbox with all the tools and no objective, and I'll have both all the ideas and no ideas at all, and I'll just wander aimlessly not being able to do anything.
April 29, 2025 at 6:20 AM
I can't handle games like Minecraft. I need some kind of goal. Even the most minor one. Plop me in a sandbox with all the tools and no objective, and I'll have both all the ideas and no ideas at all, and I'll just wander aimlessly not being able to do anything.
When the oppressed seek equality/equity, and especially when they're given even a modicum of that, the oppressors see it as *them* being oppressed.
April 12, 2025 at 6:37 PM
When the oppressed seek equality/equity, and especially when they're given even a modicum of that, the oppressors see it as *them* being oppressed.
Aw, y'all putting an end to my fun? :P
Was nice while it lasted. ^_^
Was nice while it lasted. ^_^
April 5, 2025 at 7:18 AM
Aw, y'all putting an end to my fun? :P
Was nice while it lasted. ^_^
Was nice while it lasted. ^_^
Didn't know Nori had a server. I don't think I'd join it anyway. Too many Discord/Telegram groups as it is. But glad more folk are keeping tabs.
Never expected to see Nori pop into the convo. They're cool. And they're eviscerating GR, too. Which is fun to watch. :3
Never expected to see Nori pop into the convo. They're cool. And they're eviscerating GR, too. Which is fun to watch. :3
April 5, 2025 at 6:15 AM
Didn't know Nori had a server. I don't think I'd join it anyway. Too many Discord/Telegram groups as it is. But glad more folk are keeping tabs.
Never expected to see Nori pop into the convo. They're cool. And they're eviscerating GR, too. Which is fun to watch. :3
Never expected to see Nori pop into the convo. They're cool. And they're eviscerating GR, too. Which is fun to watch. :3
Oh look, it me. :D
I'm getting this odd sense of pride that I managed to kick off this whole thing just with a few comments on your journal. I just said his name and he appeared. He then proceeded to have his arguments torn to shreds and his mask drop hard.
I'm getting this odd sense of pride that I managed to kick off this whole thing just with a few comments on your journal. I just said his name and he appeared. He then proceeded to have his arguments torn to shreds and his mask drop hard.
April 5, 2025 at 5:52 AM
Oh look, it me. :D
I'm getting this odd sense of pride that I managed to kick off this whole thing just with a few comments on your journal. I just said his name and he appeared. He then proceeded to have his arguments torn to shreds and his mask drop hard.
I'm getting this odd sense of pride that I managed to kick off this whole thing just with a few comments on your journal. I just said his name and he appeared. He then proceeded to have his arguments torn to shreds and his mask drop hard.
I mentioned to you that I've been taking screenshots, too. I've been using Firefox to screenshot the entire page. I've deleted previous screenshots when I save a new one, tho.
I started because I was like, just in case GR deletes the journal or bans me. But he's too "centrist" to do that.
I started because I was like, just in case GR deletes the journal or bans me. But he's too "centrist" to do that.
April 5, 2025 at 5:48 AM
I mentioned to you that I've been taking screenshots, too. I've been using Firefox to screenshot the entire page. I've deleted previous screenshots when I save a new one, tho.
I started because I was like, just in case GR deletes the journal or bans me. But he's too "centrist" to do that.
I started because I was like, just in case GR deletes the journal or bans me. But he's too "centrist" to do that.
Nah. Fascists need to present their policies as having wide-ranging public support. Protests harm that narrative. So they try to delegitimize public dissent by claiming they're paid actors.
March 9, 2025 at 6:15 AM
Nah. Fascists need to present their policies as having wide-ranging public support. Protests harm that narrative. So they try to delegitimize public dissent by claiming they're paid actors.