✙ Микола ✙
@zbroyar.bsky.social
Тимчасово виконуючий обовʼязки Громадянина України.
Інженер, чоловік, батько.
Інженер, чоловік, батько.
Останнє тут до того, що бажалочка Трампа реіндустріалізувати свою країну, коли до неї потроху підбирається серйозна війна, - абсолютно логічна: ти не можеш воювати послугами та цифровими сервісами.
Але-ж методи… (рукаобличчя)
Але-ж методи… (рукаобличчя)
April 9, 2025 at 12:10 AM
Останнє тут до того, що бажалочка Трампа реіндустріалізувати свою країну, коли до неї потроху підбирається серйозна війна, - абсолютно логічна: ти не можеш воювати послугами та цифровими сервісами.
Але-ж методи… (рукаобличчя)
Але-ж методи… (рукаобличчя)
Ну і мабуть ще третя, але вона не тільки наша:
3. Хорошими намірами вистелена дорога до пекла.
3. Хорошими намірами вистелена дорога до пекла.
April 9, 2025 at 12:10 AM
Ну і мабуть ще третя, але вона не тільки наша:
3. Хорошими намірами вистелена дорога до пекла.
3. Хорошими намірами вистелена дорога до пекла.
What emacs modes are you using for presentations? Aside from org-mode, obviously :-)
April 5, 2025 at 10:11 PM
What emacs modes are you using for presentations? Aside from org-mode, obviously :-)
Reposted by ✙ Микола ✙
Original article is about the company, - namely, SpaceX, - that receive government’s money.
Not about Musk.
IMHO, there are probably reasons to investigate Musk, but there is no reason to investigate SpaceX.
With all due respect to topic starter.
Not about Musk.
IMHO, there are probably reasons to investigate Musk, but there is no reason to investigate SpaceX.
With all due respect to topic starter.
March 24, 2025 at 9:21 PM
Original article is about the company, - namely, SpaceX, - that receive government’s money.
Not about Musk.
IMHO, there are probably reasons to investigate Musk, but there is no reason to investigate SpaceX.
With all due respect to topic starter.
Not about Musk.
IMHO, there are probably reasons to investigate Musk, but there is no reason to investigate SpaceX.
With all due respect to topic starter.
No. The US need satellites for its economy and military. We in Ukraine need those satellites.
But for now no one can send a satellite into space cheaper than SpaceX.
But for now no one can send a satellite into space cheaper than SpaceX.
March 24, 2025 at 8:52 PM
No. The US need satellites for its economy and military. We in Ukraine need those satellites.
But for now no one can send a satellite into space cheaper than SpaceX.
But for now no one can send a satellite into space cheaper than SpaceX.
Probably, but SpaceX has a cutting edge technology for sure.
No one in the world can propose cheaper way to get you kilogram to space.
No one in the world can propose cheaper way to get you kilogram to space.
March 24, 2025 at 8:50 PM
Probably, but SpaceX has a cutting edge technology for sure.
No one in the world can propose cheaper way to get you kilogram to space.
No one in the world can propose cheaper way to get you kilogram to space.