As nice as that would be, after having slept on the IP for almost a decade, LEGO would probably want to advertise their own game rather than just dropping it unanounced.

As unfortunate as it is to say, FF is probably going to be more of a promotional set for MTG for non-established people than Tarkir is for existing players.

I would prefer if someone didn't vote if they didn't think Harris's plan would bring prices down vs. voting for someone who doesn't give half a shit about prices and just wants the office and the apparently nonexistent checks and balances.

Most, if not all, accusations from the right seem to eventually turn out to be confessions

It also could dissuade actual tourists from visiting. Which I get isn't the most critical issue because it's not strictly a tourist site, but just why? What non-rasict reason could possibly explain it?

I'm perfectly willing to respect other people's beliefs... if there's a good faith/consistent effort for them to do the same.

The ones included are absolutely not operating on the same level

Name aside, Ja Tiika is more analogous to Macalania Woods than Rak'tika, recolored gear isn't really anything (WoD gear shares models with a crafted lvl70 set, and Mt. Gulg set), and the trolley gang doesn't mean anything. Souls don't have to be born in the same area to be who they are.

I'm curious where DT implies Norvrandt is the First's equivalent to Tural, because that would be a major oversight/retcon due to how much it maps to Eorzea

I'd rather have the people vote on their wage increases rather than them getting to vote on increased wages for the next congressional congress (and knowing that most get reelected)
Or term limits

Fast food restaurants can't just have their niche anymore. They all want to draw people to them by having a bit of what other restaurants have

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crusades

I recall Gisa and Geralf have a story told by letters back and forth, but I don't recall one by letters about the Skirsdag/Church

Because right-wing politicians are the party of "Rules for thee, not for me"

Don't misunderstand, I'm very much against him.

I don't even think it's entirely because she's a woman. She was just chosen as the nominee rather than running for president the entire time, which certainly alienated some people due to the undemocraticness of that action.