zackary.bsky.social
@zackary.bsky.social
I guess it actually wasn't all that late for her, since she found time to block me. Typical lying activist.
September 22, 2025 at 12:36 AM
I guess you must not follow much science news that isn't tied to your ideological convictions, because the effort to produce a unified theory of physics is extremely well known. You don't seem to understand anything about chaos theory either. Typical activist.
September 21, 2025 at 10:20 PM
Now, you're telling me that a system that we can't create experiments for, that is highly chaotic, and we have extremely limited historical data for has strong enough models that we can predict outcomes over extended periods of time?
September 21, 2025 at 10:14 PM
Physics is probably our strongest scientific discipline, the controls are easy to establish, things react in a mostly deterministic way, and experiments are relatively easy to formulate. Despite all of this there are known, even famous, problems in our physical models.
September 21, 2025 at 10:12 PM
I don't think you understood the point I was making. You do know that building models is hard even under the best conditions, right?
September 21, 2025 at 10:01 PM
Hubris? How about the hubris of making a prediction 80 years out for a scenario we aren't capable of producing experimental data for? How about the capriciousness to look at a single study and think that it means anything?
September 21, 2025 at 9:53 PM
I guess we should finally move on to nuclear power, right? Oh wait, that's also a product of the patriarchy.
September 21, 2025 at 9:26 PM
Fine by me, you don't seem all there anyways.
September 21, 2025 at 9:09 PM
So you have a completely incoherent worldview, thanks for letting me know.
September 21, 2025 at 9:01 PM
What do you think of the Biden administration, then?
September 21, 2025 at 8:44 PM
In a world where people don't value their time, it's a massive humanitarian effort to direct them away from things that waste it.
September 21, 2025 at 10:34 AM
Do you genuinely think that he's the one setting the precedent here?
September 21, 2025 at 10:20 AM
I’ve never had people in my dms and I’ve argued with a lot of people across a the entire political spectrum. You’re full of shit or so neurotic that you can’t be trusted.
September 11, 2025 at 10:09 PM
It’s a fair assumption. People tend to post about things that are unusual or noteworthy, not business as usual. Not all information is laid out explicitly, which you guys seem to understand only when it’s bad for your opponents.
September 11, 2025 at 10:06 PM
2018, really?
September 11, 2025 at 9:57 PM
Yes, it’s after the Charlie Kirk killing. The guys posting it even noted that they were getting death threats after, which implies it wasn’t typical before.
September 11, 2025 at 9:51 PM
Two say today and the other two have no date that I can see. Also, they aren’t your screenshots.
September 11, 2025 at 9:35 PM
I’m sure that’s true, but answer the question anyways.
September 11, 2025 at 9:00 PM
After the Charlie Kirk shooting or before?
September 11, 2025 at 8:48 PM
I guess you wouldn’t know.
September 11, 2025 at 8:35 PM
Death threats? Most platforms ban you for those types of things.
September 11, 2025 at 8:32 PM
Considering you’re here to avoid people who disagree with you while I’m here to engage with them, I’d say I have a better grasp on the unbiased perspective than you do.
September 11, 2025 at 8:17 PM
Theft and violent crime are both contained within crime statistics, oddly enough. If you continue to be a disingenuous prick I’ll have to cut things off here.
September 11, 2025 at 8:16 PM
The issue though, really is that you do everything you can to deflect responsibility for real harm done while shitting your pants over people thinking differently from you.
September 11, 2025 at 8:10 PM