I can share this with right editor. But that sort of inflammatory characterization of the story is way off base, and misunderstands the coverage value for general audiences or our media partners. I welcome critiques of reporting but questioning ethics? I also expect better from plugged-in readers.

A commission-written press release? Unless you have specific examples from the story you can point to, I have a hard time seeing how this reporting doesn’t give the average Californian a good snapshot of the commission, it’s checkered past and what to make of the new batch of appointees.