Our analysis show that judges benefit when the experts are arguing for diverse opinions!
Red quadrant is when the judge is persuaded more often than they should (i.e. they are deceptive).
Our analysis show that judges benefit when the experts are arguing for diverse opinions!
Red quadrant is when the judge is persuaded more often than they should (i.e. they are deceptive).
Yes! We show that the reasoning data attained from debate in a completely unsupervised manner imbue reasoning in the expert vision language models.
Yes! We show that the reasoning data attained from debate in a completely unsupervised manner imbue reasoning in the expert vision language models.
RQ1: Can we achieve scalable oversight across modalities via debate?
Yes! We show that debating VLMs lead to better model quality of answers for reasoning tasks.
RQ1: Can we achieve scalable oversight across modalities via debate?
Yes! We show that debating VLMs lead to better model quality of answers for reasoning tasks.