@yn2space.bsky.social
*he votes trump*
(Which wouldn’t be a problem if women had all voted for Harris but too many wanna suck Trumps dick too)
(Which wouldn’t be a problem if women had all voted for Harris but too many wanna suck Trumps dick too)
February 24, 2025 at 3:37 PM
*he votes trump*
(Which wouldn’t be a problem if women had all voted for Harris but too many wanna suck Trumps dick too)
(Which wouldn’t be a problem if women had all voted for Harris but too many wanna suck Trumps dick too)
And like that you’ve lost me.
This is WHY we keep losing elections. This is not a reasonable stance in America, ever for any reason.
Be better communicators, have rhetoric and love conquer hate not police forces. If your ideas have merit then let people see it by reading and learning.
This is WHY we keep losing elections. This is not a reasonable stance in America, ever for any reason.
Be better communicators, have rhetoric and love conquer hate not police forces. If your ideas have merit then let people see it by reading and learning.
February 22, 2025 at 11:48 PM
And like that you’ve lost me.
This is WHY we keep losing elections. This is not a reasonable stance in America, ever for any reason.
Be better communicators, have rhetoric and love conquer hate not police forces. If your ideas have merit then let people see it by reading and learning.
This is WHY we keep losing elections. This is not a reasonable stance in America, ever for any reason.
Be better communicators, have rhetoric and love conquer hate not police forces. If your ideas have merit then let people see it by reading and learning.
So we should restrict those words via law?
February 22, 2025 at 11:20 PM
So we should restrict those words via law?
That’s just not how it looks to the outside though. That isn’t how the court of public opinion on the global stage saw it or does now.
It looked like the only time the union was willing to act over it was when its sovereignty/authority was threatened, not slavery itself.
It looked like the only time the union was willing to act over it was when its sovereignty/authority was threatened, not slavery itself.
January 27, 2025 at 12:51 PM
That’s just not how it looks to the outside though. That isn’t how the court of public opinion on the global stage saw it or does now.
It looked like the only time the union was willing to act over it was when its sovereignty/authority was threatened, not slavery itself.
It looked like the only time the union was willing to act over it was when its sovereignty/authority was threatened, not slavery itself.
It is where you’re going that matters, but nobody can trust you are right until you’re there, and once you’re there the past looks bad.
So on and so forth.
So on and so forth.
January 26, 2025 at 9:51 PM
It is where you’re going that matters, but nobody can trust you are right until you’re there, and once you’re there the past looks bad.
So on and so forth.
So on and so forth.
Sure, but we put up with it for almost 100 years till then.
It’s easy to say “well we took care of our own” but it’s from the outside it looked very hypocritical given kkk and segregation(which nazi propaganda took full advantage of). Public image in history is tough. Everyone looks bad.
It’s easy to say “well we took care of our own” but it’s from the outside it looked very hypocritical given kkk and segregation(which nazi propaganda took full advantage of). Public image in history is tough. Everyone looks bad.
January 26, 2025 at 9:51 PM
Sure, but we put up with it for almost 100 years till then.
It’s easy to say “well we took care of our own” but it’s from the outside it looked very hypocritical given kkk and segregation(which nazi propaganda took full advantage of). Public image in history is tough. Everyone looks bad.
It’s easy to say “well we took care of our own” but it’s from the outside it looked very hypocritical given kkk and segregation(which nazi propaganda took full advantage of). Public image in history is tough. Everyone looks bad.
It depends on the age of it. In Russia probably old and harder to fix or replace depending on damages.
January 26, 2025 at 9:20 PM
It depends on the age of it. In Russia probably old and harder to fix or replace depending on damages.
I would choose the condenser units. They are big, close to other areas where fires could ignite. Even if fires are put out they are hard to replace, and the mess would be a lot to clean up. The tanks here are not a terrible target really for small uavs. Attrition to production at least.
January 26, 2025 at 7:44 PM
I would choose the condenser units. They are big, close to other areas where fires could ignite. Even if fires are put out they are hard to replace, and the mess would be a lot to clean up. The tanks here are not a terrible target really for small uavs. Attrition to production at least.
Bingo, and even pipes may be in areas where deluge systems could easily kill a fire. Pipes are then easily replaced really. No problems after that.
January 26, 2025 at 7:41 PM
Bingo, and even pipes may be in areas where deluge systems could easily kill a fire. Pipes are then easily replaced really. No problems after that.
It depends. Control room is cables and computers, modern day easily replaced and repowered. If there are proper safety shutoffs, the refinery could return to service quite fast. Also safety regulations may keep it far from sympathetic damage areas.
January 26, 2025 at 7:40 PM
It depends. Control room is cables and computers, modern day easily replaced and repowered. If there are proper safety shutoffs, the refinery could return to service quite fast. Also safety regulations may keep it far from sympathetic damage areas.
It’s not really a materials problem here. That’s fine for bunkers or bridges, mostly irrelevant here when you’re worried about the rarity and ability to reproduce or repair a type of valve or distillation unit. Sort of how Israel targeted those Iranian mixers. Sounds great, isn’t really imho.
January 26, 2025 at 6:55 PM
It’s not really a materials problem here. That’s fine for bunkers or bridges, mostly irrelevant here when you’re worried about the rarity and ability to reproduce or repair a type of valve or distillation unit. Sort of how Israel targeted those Iranian mixers. Sounds great, isn’t really imho.
Yeah, the main thing is that to know what to target best you have basically got to be an engineer that works on these things, but then you’re probably not an engineer who knows how missiles/explosive destructive effects work best either.
January 26, 2025 at 6:47 PM
Yeah, the main thing is that to know what to target best you have basically got to be an engineer that works on these things, but then you’re probably not an engineer who knows how missiles/explosive destructive effects work best either.
These things are extremely difficult and I’ve not known targeteers to be typically good with complex infrastructure unfortunately.
January 26, 2025 at 6:34 PM
These things are extremely difficult and I’ve not known targeteers to be typically good with complex infrastructure unfortunately.
The US was closer to slavery then than we are to the Holocaust now.
January 26, 2025 at 2:53 PM
The US was closer to slavery then than we are to the Holocaust now.
PRECISELY!
It was an easing process. The reality was not so kind and the Wehrmacht were often just as bad as the SS. Furthermore, at the end of the war even the SS was filled with draftees, the “good normal Germans” (still warcriming tho).
It was an easing process. The reality was not so kind and the Wehrmacht were often just as bad as the SS. Furthermore, at the end of the war even the SS was filled with draftees, the “good normal Germans” (still warcriming tho).
January 26, 2025 at 2:37 PM
PRECISELY!
It was an easing process. The reality was not so kind and the Wehrmacht were often just as bad as the SS. Furthermore, at the end of the war even the SS was filled with draftees, the “good normal Germans” (still warcriming tho).
It was an easing process. The reality was not so kind and the Wehrmacht were often just as bad as the SS. Furthermore, at the end of the war even the SS was filled with draftees, the “good normal Germans” (still warcriming tho).
Throughout its history of colonization it did. Which at that point was fresh history and a concern, you aren’t thinking of it now because for you it is a totally different era. However for them, it was all to easy to point a finger and go “what about” on and on forever.
January 26, 2025 at 2:35 PM
Throughout its history of colonization it did. Which at that point was fresh history and a concern, you aren’t thinking of it now because for you it is a totally different era. However for them, it was all to easy to point a finger and go “what about” on and on forever.
Well, not quite “valid”, sure, they were the Germans. Houses and churches and residential areas were bomb aimpoints on both sides, but obviously our side was doing it to just destroy industry and just dehouse the populace of course. That’s HUGE difference
January 26, 2025 at 2:33 PM
Well, not quite “valid”, sure, they were the Germans. Houses and churches and residential areas were bomb aimpoints on both sides, but obviously our side was doing it to just destroy industry and just dehouse the populace of course. That’s HUGE difference
The point is that by making the Wehrmacht “clean” Western Europe could better rebuild and rehabilitate the German military, while also making themselves look a bit better for only doing slightly better things. Thereby isolating the worst to the SS.
January 26, 2025 at 2:30 PM
The point is that by making the Wehrmacht “clean” Western Europe could better rebuild and rehabilitate the German military, while also making themselves look a bit better for only doing slightly better things. Thereby isolating the worst to the SS.
I was more thinking stuff like Jallianwala Bagh, Mau Mau, and the South Africa concentration camps.
And it really doesn’t matter, under those stipulations, London, Stalingrad, Tokyo, Hiroshima, and Nagasaki were all valid targets too.
And it really doesn’t matter, under those stipulations, London, Stalingrad, Tokyo, Hiroshima, and Nagasaki were all valid targets too.
January 26, 2025 at 2:28 PM
I was more thinking stuff like Jallianwala Bagh, Mau Mau, and the South Africa concentration camps.
And it really doesn’t matter, under those stipulations, London, Stalingrad, Tokyo, Hiroshima, and Nagasaki were all valid targets too.
And it really doesn’t matter, under those stipulations, London, Stalingrad, Tokyo, Hiroshima, and Nagasaki were all valid targets too.
A lot of the “clean Wehrmacht” narrative is complicated. A big part was made by Allied nations while rebuilding relations with GE.
And vs allied armies atrocities before (Britain in India & Kenya) and during the war, they were somewhat comparable, so it was beneficial to frame them as “clean”.
And vs allied armies atrocities before (Britain in India & Kenya) and during the war, they were somewhat comparable, so it was beneficial to frame them as “clean”.
January 26, 2025 at 2:20 PM
A lot of the “clean Wehrmacht” narrative is complicated. A big part was made by Allied nations while rebuilding relations with GE.
And vs allied armies atrocities before (Britain in India & Kenya) and during the war, they were somewhat comparable, so it was beneficial to frame them as “clean”.
And vs allied armies atrocities before (Britain in India & Kenya) and during the war, they were somewhat comparable, so it was beneficial to frame them as “clean”.