Yannick Oswald
banner
yloswald.bsky.social
Yannick Oswald
@yloswald.bsky.social
Researcher @University of Lausanne | Follow me for complexity, computational modelling, ecological economics 📉, sustainability + climate 🌍🌿, personal views

Web: https://yannickoswald.github.io/
Substack: https://substack.com/@theworldinmodels
Amazing Markus, I did not know your hub yet. Happy to hear about it. You may find this "idea" interesting too
: www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
Artificial Utopia: Simulation and artificially intelligent agents for exploring Utopian and democratized futures
Prevailing top-down systems in politics and economics struggle to keep pace with the pressing challenges of the 21st century, such as climate change, …
www.sciencedirect.com
October 22, 2025 at 10:46 AM
layout opportunities to engage with and reimagine political, economic and social systems by means of simulating them.

I hope it is interesting and even useful to some.
October 6, 2025 at 11:37 AM
I am not the first to address the simulation of Utopias, but I am the first to scope the literature, connect the dots across fields as diverse as the sociology of Utopia, economics, complexity science, artificial intelligence and so forth and
October 6, 2025 at 11:37 AM
Interestingly enough there is even a paper on this that finds AI biases the review process towards more positive outcomes. arxiv.org/abs/2405.02150 Perhaps. But I think the final outcome is yet to see and regardless of the sign of the outcome, the quality possibly decreases.
The AI Review Lottery: Widespread AI-Assisted Peer Reviews Boost Paper Scores and Acceptance Rates
Journals and conferences worry that peer reviews assisted by artificial intelligence (AI), in particular, large language models (LLMs), may negatively influence the validity and fairness of the peer-r...
arxiv.org
May 14, 2025 at 8:47 AM
I think using AI to refine reviews as any other text is fine, as long as it remains a high quality honest review, but in my case it went so far that the "reviews" clearly just rephrased limitations from my own text and any AI detector would immediately detect it. I felt cheated.
May 14, 2025 at 8:35 AM
Discussion welcome!
March 11, 2025 at 8:47 AM
And lastly I speculate about the future and general ability of computational research to aid in such democratisation and scientific efforts. What are its limits? Ethical propblems?
March 11, 2025 at 8:47 AM
Further I generally systematize and map simulation approaches to their characteristic domains of validity and specific application areas in studying radical democratisation proposal
March 11, 2025 at 8:47 AM
More concretely I conceptualise one specific possible model architecture to study an alternative political economy in which citizen-assembly-like deliberation plays a central role in societal decision-making
March 11, 2025 at 8:47 AM
Specifically, I map exisiting simulation methods to existing challenges in niche democratisation efforts such as citizen assemblies and democratic firms to generate a better understanding of how computational simulation may aid social, political and economic innovation.

Hope you enjoy!✍️
March 11, 2025 at 8:38 AM
🌳It is a research perspective piece intending to conceive the potential for applying computational simulation methods and artificial intelligence to investigate new and alternative democratic paradigms of political economy.
March 11, 2025 at 8:38 AM
But evidence shows different already.

Here is a study showing that LLM generated ideas are judged as more novel than researcher generated ideas in NLP.

arxiv.org/abs/2409.04109
Can LLMs Generate Novel Research Ideas? A Large-Scale Human Study with 100+ NLP Researchers
Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have sparked optimism about their potential to accelerate scientific discovery, with a growing number of works proposing research agents that autono...
arxiv.org
March 7, 2025 at 5:58 PM