ItsTheYeastyBoys
@yeastyboy.bsky.social
Husky-loving law dog who loves her Longhorns but hates fascists. Science, animals, politics, horror movies (redundant), pinball, travel, escape hatches.
Reposted by ItsTheYeastyBoys
How pathetic are conservatives? They’ve whined how leftists are snowflakes and can’t handle ‘different opinions’ (racism, sexism, transphobia, etc), but the second they see a Democratic lawmaker they scream for Mod Elon. MODS!
November 21, 2025 at 1:35 AM
How pathetic are conservatives? They’ve whined how leftists are snowflakes and can’t handle ‘different opinions’ (racism, sexism, transphobia, etc), but the second they see a Democratic lawmaker they scream for Mod Elon. MODS!
Reposted by ItsTheYeastyBoys
The TX ruling would *not* invalidate CA's new districts. The amendment passed by Prop 50 mentions Texas, but there's no trigger provision. It's just an explanatory reference. ballotpedia.org/California_P...
![SEC. 4. (a) It is the policy of the State of California to support the use of fair, independent, and nonpartisan redistricting commissions nationwide. The people of the State of California call on the Congress of the United States to pass federal legislation and propose an amendment of the United States Constitution to require the use of fair, independent, and nonpartisan redistricting commissions nationwide.
(b) In response to the congressional redistricting in Texas in 2025, and notwithstanding any other provision of this Constitution or existing law, the single-member districts for Congress reflected in Assembly Bill 604 of the 2025–26 Regular Session pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 21400) of Division 21 of the Elections Code shall temporarily be used for every congressional election for a term of office commencing on or after the date this subdivision becomes operative and before the certification of new congressional boundary lines drawn by the Citizens Redistricting Commission pursuant to subdivision (d).
(c) (1) The Attorney General has the sole legal standing to defend any action regarding a congressional district map adopted pursuant to subdivision (b).
(2) The California Supreme Court has original and exclusive jurisdiction in all proceedings in which a congressional district map adopted pursuant to subdivision (b) is challenged.
(d) The Citizens Redistricting Commission established pursuant to Section 1 shall continue to adjust the boundary lines of the congressional, State Senatorial, Assembly, and Board of Equalization districts in conformance with the standards and process set forth in Section 2 in 2031, and every 10 years thereafter as provided in Section 1.[43]](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:alqdxbp33ceoyly2o46nvcrc/bafkreihk67th23ahmgsomceqzbbmje3kdxqsbcsoirgbsn33bzlqpcdfgq@jpeg)
November 18, 2025 at 6:19 PM
The TX ruling would *not* invalidate CA's new districts. The amendment passed by Prop 50 mentions Texas, but there's no trigger provision. It's just an explanatory reference. ballotpedia.org/California_P...
Reposted by ItsTheYeastyBoys
Looked it up. Donohue, the author here, is the president of the Catholic League, & also an adjunct scholar with the Heritage Foundation. It has been his life’s mission to defend sexual abuse in the Catholic Church and he is using Kelly’s statements as a further justification in his argument.
November 15, 2025 at 2:13 PM
Looked it up. Donohue, the author here, is the president of the Catholic League, & also an adjunct scholar with the Heritage Foundation. It has been his life’s mission to defend sexual abuse in the Catholic Church and he is using Kelly’s statements as a further justification in his argument.
well if there's one official you can trust when it comes to investigating the Epstein matter, it's..... PAM BONDI
November 14, 2025 at 7:07 PM
well if there's one official you can trust when it comes to investigating the Epstein matter, it's..... PAM BONDI
Reposted by ItsTheYeastyBoys
