instead of 2, write why flow because it's an idiotic idea for a source

I did this a long time ago, so 2 is outdated. Instead, tell me why you put the flow on the source, it's too complicated and stupid. Change would be better.

regarding 2, I asked these questions 3 months ago, which is why 2 is no longer valid, but instead of that, could you tell me why you chose flow as the source and not change and just kept rambling like that?

Answe me plsssssss

Pls answer me

Is the lack of destruction and creation in this source caused by the fact that they are elemental essences and not elements?

so they both can create/control plants but the master of nature will sound so stupid but talking to plants and feel them?