fallout new vegas 2 with a thief theme confirmed??

But seeing Skyrim, i find writing a bit off. I don't know if Skyrim breaks the lore, like i said i didn't play the other games, but Skyrim's questline doesn't have good writing imo. It's fun to play, despite the jankiness of 2011, but thinking about the writing isn't fun.

I'd also like to talk about Elder Scrolls universe but for goodness' sake, it's too hard for me to play even the Morrowind at 2024. The first three Elder Scrolls games needs a remake for me to properly play them.

New Vegas is good, if there is anything that breaks the lore in New Vegas, i haven't seen it yet. Though Old World Blues DLC was bit of weird but it doesn't break the lore i guess?

5
Thus the most democratic thing one can do is to acknowledge the slavery and act accordingly upon it. A time ago, John Brown, your folk-hero in 1900's did it. And now we shall do the same.

4
And yes, i dare not to say only that we were never free, but we will never be free as long as those among us who has to lose from people having better wages are around.

3
Laws are necessary if cooperation is impossible. And cooperation is impossible if frictions and opposite benefits are at play. Once a society gets rid of their frictions and opposite benefits, laws must be replaced with consensus.

2
How can someone claim a people is free, while they still bow to the power instead of free cooperation among themselves? Just the continuation of power struggle and specialized laws being necessary to put social classes "calm" shows that the freedom was never achieved, but the step was made.

1
I acknowledge your perspective. However, i have to disagree. For one have to acknowledge, neither the revolutionary war nor the french revolution was the freedom itself; it was the shift in power. State, as well as wars between "free" peoples continued.

5-
Untill the social fractions are gone, a true democracy cannot be achieved. This is why the democracy that we live in today is not timeless, it has the quite opposite characteristic: obsolete.

4-
Thus, they needed the proletariat whilst guarding their own interests against the proletariat. This is why they started to manipulate the masses and corrupt the democracy. I suppose you are familiar with a similar historical event like this, back in the Roman Republic?

3-
The bourgeoisie won the struggle, however they cannot get rid of the proletariat due to the proletariat being the laborers that are the absolute necessary for a country to survive and florish.

2-
However, Bourgeoisie and Proletariat have opposit benefits and frictions that disallows them to live in an eternal harmony and collabration. Due to this, socialism rose and fight for the hegemony was waged between 19th century and 21st century.

1-
I said "unique", because the democracy you lived in and i live in are different. I will briefly explain.

The collapse of feudalism in europe was possible due to the collabration of two classes: Bourgeoisie and Proletariat.

Lol probably, i'm not an american after all. After this interaction, i'll read about them.

True. Plain flavor of eggs are not enjoyable imo. I either make a sauce for them or just put salt on top of them.

Thus, democracy is an illusion. If election results can be predicted with state's needs instead of the public's benefits, there isn't a democracy to talk about anymore.

I've seen Trump's victory months ago, because he is an Isolationist. American elections can still be predicted with the good old interventionist-isolationist dilemma. What i did was "okay they are preparing to wage war again, so they need industry in their continent again, so Trump will win."

from a bannerlord mod