Pulling something from a website doesn’t disappear it. We aren’t that far down the rabbit hole - even if some of you seem to desire that.

Of course they can. It describes a theory of the law. Anyone - including judges - can consider whether they agree with that theory.

Yes. I think she is.

Further, to imply that the Office’s publication of part of a study initiated more than 18 months ago was timed to impact a particular litigation when there are many such litigations pending seems deliberately ungenerous to hardworking public servants - particularly in the current context.

Sometimes you should just accept an agency’s statement for what it says. There are lots of demands on all agencies and no one can dispute the number of inquiries asking USCO for Part 3.

Vote NO on the CR!