This is a bad argument, there are subreddits dedicated to people who think pissing in the sink is more hygienic

Just realised I meant "avoid going *after* companies"

My cynical (and hopefully wrong) thought is that because existing ones impart culpability to the service and not necessarily just users there is a reluctance to enforce, so "strengthening" might be an introduction of something that is less broad in scope so they can avoid not going after companies

It's AI techbros and company CEOs acting like aristocrats where they believe everyone 'lesser' than themselves are akin to mindless animals

And the owner of the platform was publically mocking concerns about this very subject

Not very good but the occasional neck pain distracts from it

I also think it's very important one of the Americans who does is the President who a third of the country decides they want the exact same thing he does even if they expressed the exact opposite a week ago

This means one person sent an email

I saw the og Planet of the Apes the other day and the first 20 minutes are Charlton Heston monologuing about war and mankind and I couldn't help thinking no film today would be allowed get away with that without a thousand comments deriding it for inserting politics into their films

I do think there is something about deliberately centering the narrative around this dude who becomes the native's leader very quickly but the go-to comparative people bring up being Pocahontas makes me think people aren't paying attention to either movie

I think it's the idea that the protagonist is a random white guy who joins the natives, becomes a part of their culture but is instantly better at it than them and allows them to defeat the colonialists he was originally part of

The 1974 Murder on the Orient Express is great, where Albert Finney plays Poirot as an extremely weird little man who just interviews everyone in a row and it's night and day from the Branagh film

But what if the T-1000 is trying to catch me?!

This really just seems like people who don't want to admit that they're dangerous drivers

What if a Christian baby was catapulted down a 30 zone at 50 miles an hour, and the only way to save its life was to maintain equal speed with it so you carefully cushion it's fall before it hits the ground, what then?!

I don't think it is. He's already done the cuts, just because the outcomes are in the future doesn't mean he hasn't already done the thing