I think that they're going to grant Trump tariff powers based on some hypothetical future president facing a real crisis needing that tool rather than addressing the fact that we have a corrupt lying president who's fabricating crises to impose tariffs in a mob boss protection racket scheme.

It's a victory for AIPAC

Idiocracy

Does Moscow have a retirement village for fallen Putin-backed dictators like Yanukovich, Assad & hopefully someday Trump?? It could make a great sitcom - like instead of Golden Girls, "Putin's Boys"?

What about the tipping points? www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...

Did she use the rally to announce that she was going to tax billionaires to send stimmies to cover everyone's grocery bills?? She offered technocratic/neoliberal solutions to people's economic anxieties not a transformative econ agenda & lost working class votes because of it

Straw man arg: she ran as an establishment candidate rather than anti-establishment blaming billionaires/corporations for econ inequality/insecurity & proposing progressive econ populist agenda e.g. tax billionaires to send stimmies for groceries

Her economic proposals were piecemeal/niche & she went on tour w/ Cheney, not Sanders

I'm David, I can't speak but I write beautifully.

time.com/5888024/50-t...

Don't forget McMahon: www.thedailybeast.com/linda-mcmaho...

Blame billionaires & corporations for higher prices, promise to impose price controls, break up monopolies, raise wages, AND tax billionaires to fund "stimmies" to cover grocery bills. Expose Trump as a fake populist by offering real populism.

We cancelled our Thanksgiving plans with my family (a.k.a. 'the social base for fascism in the U.S.")

Thank you for this episode, but particularly this segment.

How can someone write about "interest groups" influencing the Democratic party w/o writing abt corporate/wealthy donors who prevent Dem candidates from running progressive econ populist campaigns? Is he really that ignorant or does he too not want to offend donors?