Marc Burton
banner
worldwidethunder.bsky.social
Marc Burton
@worldwidethunder.bsky.social
Producer of all things entertainment related. Independent feature film, music, concerts, etc.
You didn’t. But that’s fine. Be well.
May 18, 2025 at 5:14 AM
And not everyone in his administration believed he was unfit. The book acknowledges this, whether they are right or wrong.
May 18, 2025 at 5:05 AM
If Biden himself were to say he was unfit to run (which I do not think he believes), this would only be used to destroy his legacy and all the good he accomplished by calling into question the legitimacy of his presidency.
May 18, 2025 at 5:02 AM
That’s the third time you have said about the same thing. I fail to see how this makes anything better. And in fact, given everything I have seen from MAGA and the media, it has been and will be used to further bludgeon the party into oblivion. So how does any of this make it “better?” Be specific.
May 18, 2025 at 5:00 AM
Mr. Garwood: how does any of this get us any closer to “better?”
May 17, 2025 at 7:27 PM
Don’t let him off the hook. Keep pushing for a response to the original thesis: specifically, how does this analysis push us any closer to “better?” The Bidens didn’t deceive anyone. They genuinely believed Joe was up to the challenge. They also withdrew. Biden’s legacy should not be in question.
May 17, 2025 at 7:27 PM
“Biden fit for office” will be used as shorthand to short-circuit any discussion in the 2028 election cycle; see “Russian Collusion” and “Pandemic Lockdowns.”
May 17, 2025 at 4:17 PM
We need to be abundantly clear what this is actually about. Anyone can string together any series of anecdotes to paint whatever portrait they want. This discussion isn’t really about Biden, it is about adding fuel to the fire that the media and Democrats cannot be trusted.
May 17, 2025 at 4:17 PM
I read every page of the slack transcription. All 140 of them.

I see scientists working against an impossible deadline, openly discussing theory in an honest, forthright manner, searching for the truth while entertaining all options.

The way you have been vilified is shameful. You have my respect
March 18, 2025 at 5:10 AM
Can confirm. I have been following Carl for years.

In fact, most credible scientists have always maintained it is possible but that the evidence is inconclusive at best.
February 25, 2025 at 7:38 AM
Confused me a bit there.
February 25, 2025 at 6:56 AM
Was there ever any doubt?
December 28, 2024 at 5:17 PM
By “take up a trade” do you mean “fix robots?”

Because that’s where this is all headed.
December 28, 2024 at 4:47 PM
There is a samurai in the sky watching over you.
December 19, 2024 at 4:35 AM
This is protostar FS Tau B. The protoplanetary disc is the vertical dark band in this detail of the OP image.

FS Tau B is also a Herbig-Haro object due to the referenced ionized gas jets. FS Tau B has asymmetric jets (the bright blue areas on the left and right).
December 18, 2024 at 9:56 PM
This has always been Trump’s MO. Do nothing or as little as possible while making a maximum PR push about how magnificent it is.
November 27, 2024 at 7:27 AM
“I wouldn’t bet against me,” he said.

I would absolutely bet against him.
November 27, 2024 at 7:07 AM