47 pages! That’s a lot of resolutions. What’s left to be resolved next time?

That's crazy fast! I might not be able to tell the difference between 32 and 40 kmh, but anything over 50 would be obvious.
When the inevitable incident occurs, it'll be important to direct the energy towards regulations instead of a backlash. The fast bikes can go on the streets not bike paths.

How fast can e-bikes go? (not full electric models)

Is that what makes them illegal? (max speed) What even is the max speed of an e-bike?

He must squint his eyes really hard to connect any of this to his holy books.

Journals are already ranked? Would it work to exclude known paper mills from places like Google Scholar and Research Gate?
I know that's oversimplifying but maybe we’re entering an age of curated science?

Ms. Tait, I only know you through your profession. I wouldn't recognize you if we met, but I have your back! Maybe the best way to show it is to vote?
After all, that's what they're really afraid of.

Is the crux of the criticism that the meddling came with the support package, and they should just be grateful? That seems hypocritical given the “no-strings-attached” argument against federal oversight. Is there a reasoned position that could take both into account?

Have there been any studies of how much of the injected CO2 or methane escapes back into the atmosphere? I'm playing devil's advocate.

We need more “super-based” examples to live by!
Bravo!