Sorry, Hegseth. Hadn't had my coffee yet 😅
November 23, 2025 at 2:46 PM
Sorry, Hegseth. Hadn't had my coffee yet 😅
This is an administration of aesthetics. The suits, dressing up for airports, Duffy wanting our military to physically look strong, the list goes on
November 23, 2025 at 2:41 PM
This is an administration of aesthetics. The suits, dressing up for airports, Duffy wanting our military to physically look strong, the list goes on
If you didn't say it, I would have 😁
November 22, 2025 at 9:00 PM
If you didn't say it, I would have 😁
I meant the $1.75 cost 😭
November 21, 2025 at 4:47 PM
I meant the $1.75 cost 😭
Lmao, but I would love for these people to reflect on how voraciously they would insist that someone work on Thanksgiving to entertain them while they are at home with family.
November 21, 2025 at 4:29 PM
Lmao, but I would love for these people to reflect on how voraciously they would insist that someone work on Thanksgiving to entertain them while they are at home with family.
This post won't age well
November 21, 2025 at 4:26 PM
This post won't age well
At least post the good ones
November 21, 2025 at 4:18 PM
At least post the good ones
What do you mean? I'd love to be an innocent defendant in front of a "criminal conviction judge"
November 21, 2025 at 1:55 PM
What do you mean? I'd love to be an innocent defendant in front of a "criminal conviction judge"
I guess I just have higher standards for the information I share and my own credibility.
November 20, 2025 at 10:59 AM
I guess I just have higher standards for the information I share and my own credibility.
"I believe it because it's funnier if it's true"
Plenty of people believe falsehoods because it's convenient for them. I'm sure you would have a bone to pick with many of them. You should search for truth, not convenient "info."
Plenty of people believe falsehoods because it's convenient for them. I'm sure you would have a bone to pick with many of them. You should search for truth, not convenient "info."
November 20, 2025 at 1:44 AM
"I believe it because it's funnier if it's true"
Plenty of people believe falsehoods because it's convenient for them. I'm sure you would have a bone to pick with many of them. You should search for truth, not convenient "info."
Plenty of people believe falsehoods because it's convenient for them. I'm sure you would have a bone to pick with many of them. You should search for truth, not convenient "info."
Can you give me the specific evidence that he identified himself as a groyper?
November 19, 2025 at 10:17 PM
Can you give me the specific evidence that he identified himself as a groyper?
I guess I could never, in good conscience, spread information that I couldn't verify and stand behind readily. If I were called out and couldn't back up my claims, I would be quick to apologize. Guess I'm just not built for spreading misinformation, sorry.
November 19, 2025 at 10:16 PM
I guess I could never, in good conscience, spread information that I couldn't verify and stand behind readily. If I were called out and couldn't back up my claims, I would be quick to apologize. Guess I'm just not built for spreading misinformation, sorry.
My point about it not being new info is that it has been thoroughly examined, and there is not much more that can be concluded unless new info were added to give more context. I wouldn't implicate someone in murder unless I had some pretty strong direct evidence, but that's just me.
November 19, 2025 at 6:10 PM
My point about it not being new info is that it has been thoroughly examined, and there is not much more that can be concluded unless new info were added to give more context. I wouldn't implicate someone in murder unless I had some pretty strong direct evidence, but that's just me.
In the absence of good evidence, it's irresponsible to put forward a claim as if it's established truth. Even more irresponsible to make claims that are predicated on that baseless claim. That's why you don't see journalists reporting that he was a groyper, because they have standards.
November 19, 2025 at 4:34 PM
In the absence of good evidence, it's irresponsible to put forward a claim as if it's established truth. Even more irresponsible to make claims that are predicated on that baseless claim. That's why you don't see journalists reporting that he was a groyper, because they have standards.
Bro they put Pepe into the slav squat meme. Slav squat has been a meme for a looooong time. There's nothing in that photo that suggests he was specifically trying to re-enact that one picture vs. literally every slav squat meme on the internet.
November 19, 2025 at 4:33 PM
Bro they put Pepe into the slav squat meme. Slav squat has been a meme for a looooong time. There's nothing in that photo that suggests he was specifically trying to re-enact that one picture vs. literally every slav squat meme on the internet.
I didn't dismiss evidence because I wasn't presented any evidence. My point was that this info was already thoroughly investigated and no credible source was able to confidently say this dude was a groyper.
November 19, 2025 at 4:32 PM
I didn't dismiss evidence because I wasn't presented any evidence. My point was that this info was already thoroughly investigated and no credible source was able to confidently say this dude was a groyper.
Are you familiar with the concept of "the burden of proof"?
November 19, 2025 at 4:30 PM
Are you familiar with the concept of "the burden of proof"?
Are you brain poisoned, or is implicating a group in a murder of a high profile killing not impactful enough for you?
November 19, 2025 at 3:47 PM
Are you brain poisoned, or is implicating a group in a murder of a high profile killing not impactful enough for you?
Do you have direct evidence that shows that the shooter not only identified as a groyper, but followed Nick? Btw I saw someone here claim he dressed up as pepe the frog which I haven't seen anything that corroborates that after looking.
November 19, 2025 at 3:33 PM
Do you have direct evidence that shows that the shooter not only identified as a groyper, but followed Nick? Btw I saw someone here claim he dressed up as pepe the frog which I haven't seen anything that corroborates that after looking.
Literally never said that. Are you trying to imply that Nick Fuentes shot Kirk? Because there's really no other way to read your comment unless you're just strawmanning (you are, but will you admit it?)
November 19, 2025 at 2:56 PM
Literally never said that. Are you trying to imply that Nick Fuentes shot Kirk? Because there's really no other way to read your comment unless you're just strawmanning (you are, but will you admit it?)
I'm not invested in any conclusion, just the facts. Also, the burden of proof is not to prove they weren't something. I can't prove you're not a bot, so maybe I should just assume you are and stop wasting my time. How does that make you feel as a human?
November 19, 2025 at 2:19 PM
I'm not invested in any conclusion, just the facts. Also, the burden of proof is not to prove they weren't something. I can't prove you're not a bot, so maybe I should just assume you are and stop wasting my time. How does that make you feel as a human?
Wouldn't you want to investigate a claim exhaustively before making such an impactful statement? Claiming you know the ideology of a shooter, and implicating others in a murder? Sounds like you are just lazy and like I said before, dishonest. You're admitting you haven't even looked.
November 19, 2025 at 2:13 PM
Wouldn't you want to investigate a claim exhaustively before making such an impactful statement? Claiming you know the ideology of a shooter, and implicating others in a murder? Sounds like you are just lazy and like I said before, dishonest. You're admitting you haven't even looked.
Not hearing about something doesn't mean people haven't examined it thoroughly. Go to any scientific journal's website and you'll find million things you've never heard about that have been investigated with rigour.
November 19, 2025 at 2:06 PM
Not hearing about something doesn't mean people haven't examined it thoroughly. Go to any scientific journal's website and you'll find million things you've never heard about that have been investigated with rigour.
And it's been examined to death. This is not new information.
November 19, 2025 at 1:45 PM
And it's been examined to death. This is not new information.
There is absolutely no evidence that a groyper killed Kirk, and to say it like it's a given fact is extremely dishonest and gross.
November 19, 2025 at 1:28 PM
There is absolutely no evidence that a groyper killed Kirk, and to say it like it's a given fact is extremely dishonest and gross.