Will Royal
@willroyal.bsky.social
Pro-democracy, Anti-hate, Feed the hungry, Clothe the naked, Shelter the homeless, care for the infirm
Right? It seems there’d be much more smiting
June 6, 2025 at 3:59 PM
Right? It seems there’d be much more smiting
Weakio: ordered the state dept to not spend authorized funds.
Caring Citizens: that's blatantly unlawful.
Weakio: Prez said so. So sue me!
SCOTUS: we've abdicated our check and balance role, prez is immune to justice, only Congress can stop him
Congress: we have military bases to rename
Caring Citizens: that's blatantly unlawful.
Weakio: Prez said so. So sue me!
SCOTUS: we've abdicated our check and balance role, prez is immune to justice, only Congress can stop him
Congress: we have military bases to rename
January 25, 2025 at 1:36 AM
Weakio: ordered the state dept to not spend authorized funds.
Caring Citizens: that's blatantly unlawful.
Weakio: Prez said so. So sue me!
SCOTUS: we've abdicated our check and balance role, prez is immune to justice, only Congress can stop him
Congress: we have military bases to rename
Caring Citizens: that's blatantly unlawful.
Weakio: Prez said so. So sue me!
SCOTUS: we've abdicated our check and balance role, prez is immune to justice, only Congress can stop him
Congress: we have military bases to rename
so Far:
Plump Doctrine #1: if you completely destroy a city in battle, you get to keep it
Plump Doctrine #2: if you're attacked by a stronger country, you should just give up"
Plump Doctrine #1: if you completely destroy a city in battle, you get to keep it
Plump Doctrine #2: if you're attacked by a stronger country, you should just give up"
January 24, 2025 at 8:57 PM
so Far:
Plump Doctrine #1: if you completely destroy a city in battle, you get to keep it
Plump Doctrine #2: if you're attacked by a stronger country, you should just give up"
Plump Doctrine #1: if you completely destroy a city in battle, you get to keep it
Plump Doctrine #2: if you're attacked by a stronger country, you should just give up"
Plump: ordered the exec brnch to eliminate and not honor birthright citizenship
Caring Citizens: that's blatantly unconstitutional!
Plump: sue me!
SCOTUS: we've abdicated our check and balance role, prez is immune to justice, only Congress can stop him
Congress: we have military bases to rename
Caring Citizens: that's blatantly unconstitutional!
Plump: sue me!
SCOTUS: we've abdicated our check and balance role, prez is immune to justice, only Congress can stop him
Congress: we have military bases to rename
January 24, 2025 at 8:51 PM
Plump: ordered the exec brnch to eliminate and not honor birthright citizenship
Caring Citizens: that's blatantly unconstitutional!
Plump: sue me!
SCOTUS: we've abdicated our check and balance role, prez is immune to justice, only Congress can stop him
Congress: we have military bases to rename
Caring Citizens: that's blatantly unconstitutional!
Plump: sue me!
SCOTUS: we've abdicated our check and balance role, prez is immune to justice, only Congress can stop him
Congress: we have military bases to rename
Who set this shutdown in motion? Oh yeah. The guy “saving” it now
January 19, 2025 at 4:05 PM
Who set this shutdown in motion? Oh yeah. The guy “saving” it now
Ins co’s helped write the aca
They knew what to do
The ethical boundaries just don’t exist for them
They knew what to do
The ethical boundaries just don’t exist for them
January 12, 2025 at 8:45 PM
Ins co’s helped write the aca
They knew what to do
The ethical boundaries just don’t exist for them
They knew what to do
The ethical boundaries just don’t exist for them
Not understanding something never stops our maggats from expressing ill-formed opinions as fact
January 12, 2025 at 6:27 PM
Not understanding something never stops our maggats from expressing ill-formed opinions as fact
Not true, actually
49.9% of voters chose him
49.9% of voters chose him
January 4, 2025 at 5:28 PM
Not true, actually
49.9% of voters chose him
49.9% of voters chose him