There well may be nightmares (including reversals) to come, but the shadow docket shouldn't be one of them as they more usually deal with injunctions and this is not - it's a final decision.
(OTOH, "shouldn't" is doing a lot of work there.)

I know character limits can pose problems in fully explaining a position, so I need some clarification. Are you saying there are some who're saying they can't support Dems because of stances from 70 years ago? If so, who? Some names, please. If not, I don't know what you mean.

I've been struck by the fact, one I think needs more attention, that the GOPper shutdown strategy is built around the expectation that in face of people going hungry, Dems will have what they themselves lack: a conscience.

It would be quite appropriate, it being, despite the differences in circumstances and extremity, as much of a lie now as it was then.

I was amused that when Mamdani quoted the line, he didn't cite the source, unlike the other quotes he used.